Intertext: How Do Readers Perceive National and Universal Precedents?

Authors

  • Kalamkas Kalybekova

    Karaganda Technical University named after Abylkas Saginov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

  • Nurgul Nygmetova

    Karaganda Technical University named after Abylkas Saginov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

  • Baglan Kaukerbekova

    Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

  • Aiman Kelmaganbetova

    Karaganda Medical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

  • Karlygash Khamzina

    Karaganda Technical University named after Abylkas Saginov, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6850
Received: 9 July 2024 | Revised: 19 July 2024 | Accepted: 22 July 2024 | Published Online: 27 September 2024

Abstract

The article examines the national and universal level of precedent phenomena, which are one of the forms of creating intertexts. Our goal is to show which type of levels is most quickly determined by the reader. To achieve this goal, 36 respondents participated in the research work and six precedent phenomena were obtained: 3 national, 3 universal. The questions related to precedent names were composed according to words formed by metaphor, metonymy, comparison, paraphrase. The respondents' responses were analyzed using a "one-sample t-test" in the Jamovi system. The results of the study showed that universal levels are more recognizable by the reader (Univ1=4.75; Nat1=3.37; Univ2=5.99; Nat2=5.93; Univ3=4.06; Nat3=4.51). That is, statistically, the predominance was the preservation of universal concepts in the reader's mind. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of precedent, which is a type of intertext.

Keywords:

Intertext; Precedent phenomenon; Reader; Jamovi; Association

References

Afanasjeva, O., Baranova, K., Chupryna, O., 2020. Precedent Phenomena As Symbols Of Cultural Identity In YA Fiction. In: Tareva, Е., Bokova, T.N. (Eds.) Dialogue of Cultures - Culture of Dialogue: from Conflicting to Understanding, vol. 95. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. London: European Publisher. pp. 1098–1106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.11.03.116

Azamovna, A.R., 2023. Differences between Allusive References and Precedent Texts. American Journal of Public Diplomacy and International Studies. 1(6), 55–57.

Balmagambetova, Z.T., Zhunusova, Z.N., Adilova, A., 2020. Text-Based National-Precedent Phenomena In The Linguocultural Space. In: Amiryanovna, N.L. (Ed.). Word, Utterance, Text: Cognitive, Pragmatic and Cultural Aspects, vol. 86. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. London: European Publisher. pp. 488–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.08.58

Barthes, R., 1977. Image-Music-Text. Oxford: Hill and Wang.

Bachtin, M., 2003. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Brown, S., Harris, M., 2022. Cognitive Processes in Intertextuality: Analyzing Reader Response in Digital Media. Journal of Literary Theory. 16(2), 122–139.

Budaev, E. V., Chudinov, A. P., 2017. Transformations of precedent text: Metaphors We Live by in academic discourse. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki. 1, 60–67.

Culler, J., 2007. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

de Beaugrande, R., Dressler, W.U., 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. New York: Longman.

Eagleton, T., 2008. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Evenko, E.V., Klyukina, Y.V., Shipovskaya, A.A., 2014. Representation of the national precedent phenomena in the social precedent texts. TGTU. 20(3), 608–614.

Foucault, M., 1991. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.

Garcia, E., 2020. Intertextuality in Contemporary Literature: Structures and Impacts. Modern Fiction Studies. 66(4), 705–725.

Genette, G., 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gudkov, D.B., 2003. Precedentnye fenomeny v tekstah politicheskogo diskursa [Precedent phenomena in the texts of political discourse]. Moscow.

Ismailova, M., 2021. The features of precedent phenomenon and its types in a literary text. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal. 1, 92–99.

Jalоlova, I.M., 2023. Proverb as a Precedent Units. Vital Annex: International Journal of Novel Research in Advanced Sciences. 2(4), С. 21–24.

Jenkins, H., 2022. Intertextuality in Digital Media: Influence and Interpretation. Media Studies Quarterly. 10(1), 45–60.

Kodiraliyevich, B.O., Saida, M., Makhmudova, S.M., 2022. Linguocultural characteristics of precedent units in modern linguistics. Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal. 10(12), 1478–1484.

Kanashina, S.V., 2018. Internet meme and precedent phenomenon. TSPU Bulletin. 4(193), 122–129.

Karaulov, Y.N., 1987. Russkij jazyk i jazykovaja lichnost' [Russian language and linguistic personality]. Moscow.

Krasnykh, V.V., 1997. Kognitivnaja baza i precedentnye fenomeny v sisteme drugih edinic i v kommunikacii [Cognitive base and precedent phenomena in the system of other units and in communication]. Bulletin of the Moscow University. 3(9).

Kristeva, Y., 2000. Bahtin, slovo, dialo i roman [Bakhtin, word, dialogue and novel].

Lotman, Y.M., 1992. The semiotics of culture and the concept of text. Selected Articles. 1, 129–132.

Miller, T., 2021. Teaching Intertextuality: Enhancing Literary Analysis in the Classroom. Education Review. 39(2), 89–104.

Mirzatillayevich, R.S., Zokirjonogli, A.N., 2021. Precedent names in the artistic text as allusive names. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 11(8), 46–52.

Nguyen, H., Lee, J., 2023. Cross-Cultural Intertextuality and Its Effects on Global Media. International Communication Journal. 18(1), 31–49.

Nikiforova, E.S., Simanchuk, Y.A., 2021. Precedent Phenomena as a Way of Transmitting the Author's Intention. Bulletin of the Karaganda university. Philology series. 101(1), 32–37.

Nosova, E.P., 2016. Children's reading in the intertextual thesaurus of personality (based on the material of associative dictionaries). Proceedings of the AI Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University. 180, 22–30.

Sarycheva, M.R., Deryabina, S.A., Dyakova, T.A., 2021. National Precedent Phenomena In Teaching RFL: Topical Areas For Research. In: Shaklein, V.M. (Ed.). The Russian Language in Modern Scientific and Educational Environment, vol. 115. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. London: European Publisher. pp. 237–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.26

Smith, J., 2021. Intertextual References in Online Platforms: An Empirical Study. Digital Humanities Review. 8(3), 142–160.

Yevtyugina, A.A., 1995. Precedentnye teksty v pojezii V. Vysockogo [Precedent texts in the poetry of V.Vysotsky]. Ekaterinburg.

Williams, R., 2023. Emerging Trends in Intertextuality Research: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Modern Literary Studies. 29(1), 57–74.

Zhakulayev, A.M., Takirov, S.U., 2022. Features of literary and historical discourse. Bulletin of the Karaganda university. Philology series. 105(1), 124–130.

Zhakulayev, A.M., Babashov, A.M., 2023. The image of Agybay batyr in the novel “Qahar” (Fury) by I. Yesenberlin. Bulletin of the Karaganda university. Philology series. 110(2), 114–124.

Zhakulayev, A., Takirov, S., Khassenov, B., 2024. Literary text and historical discourse: A questionnaire study. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies. 7(3), 1174–1181.

Zavyalova, K.V., 2007. The functioning of the precedent text and the precedent name: the fairy tale “Cinderella" in Russian, American, Spanish and Hungarian linguistic cultures. Available online: http://www.lib.ua-ru.net/diss/cont/217108.html (accessed on 18 March 2024).

Downloads

How to Cite

Kalybekova, K., Nygmetova, N., Kaukerbekova, B., Kelmaganbetova , A., & Khamzina, K. (2024). Intertext: How Do Readers Perceive National and Universal Precedents?. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(4), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6850