Unveiling Spectatorship: Exploring Audience Engagement and Cultural Discourses in Hamlet's 'Mousetrap' and Haider's 'Bismil’

Authors

  • Nosheen Jaffar

    Lincoln University College (LUC), Petaling Jaya 47301, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Lubna Ali Mohammed

    Faculty of Social Sciences, Arts, and Humanities, Lincoln University College (LUC), Petaling Jaya 47301, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Saleem

    Department of English Language and Literature, Government Graduate College, Township, Lahore, Punjab 54770, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7172
Received: 30 August 2024 | Revised: 24 September 2024 | Accepted: 29 September 2024 | Published Online: 7 December 2024

Abstract

 This study investigates the dynamic interplay of spectatorship and performance in Vishal Bhardwaj's Haider and Shakespeare's Hamlet, focusing on the concept of the play-within-the-play to explore intersecting political and cultural discourses. In Hamlet, the “Mousetrap” scene serves as a pivotal metatheatrical moment that reveals hidden truths and assigns guilt, drawing the audience into a profound examination of justice and morality. By contrast, Haider reimagines this metatheatrical device through the “Bismil” sequence, an act of political resistance set against the fraught socio-political landscape of Kashmir. Bhardwaj transforms Shakespeare's classic into a critique of political oppression, aligning it with postcolonial concerns and regional narratives. This adaptation actively subverts Western cultural dominance, urging audiences to engage critically with both the source text and its recontextualized meanings. Situating Haider within a broader tradition of audience-centric reinterpretations of Hamlet, the study highlights how Bollywood melodrama reshapes Shakespearean drama’s emotional and analytical dimensions. The use of music, dance, and symbolism in Haider intensifies its political resonance, making the “Bismil” sequence not just a narrative device but a powerful critique of systemic violence. By emphasizing metatheatrical elements, this paper explores their role in advancing political commentary, fostering cultural hybridization, and disrupting dominant narratives. Ultimately, Haider exemplifies the transformative potential of adaptations, revealing how they can deepen audience engagement and broaden the political scope of classic texts, illuminating new possibilities for resistance and critique within contemporary frameworks.

Keywords:

Haider; Hamlet; Play-within-the-Play; Metatheatrical Elements; Political Resistance; Cultural Hybridization; Contemporary Frameworks

References

[1] Singh, J.G., 2019. Haider: Translating Shakespeare's Hamlet into a Kashmiri Context. In: Trivedi, S., Chakravarti, M. (Eds.). Shakespeare in Contemporary Adaptation and Cultural Mobility. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 175–194.

[2] Kabir, A.J., 2009. Territory of Desire: Representing the Valley of Kashmir. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, MN, USA. pp. 1–259.

[3] Alles, V., 2014. Haider — Vishal Bhardwaj and Shahid Kapoor Interview [Video file]. Available from: https://youtu.be/2Cp38K4L2sg (cited 13 September 2014).

[4] Calderwood, J.L., 1986. The Antic Disposition: A Study of Self-Representation in Shakespeare's Hamlet. Shakespeare Quarterly. 37(1), 29–46.

[5] Höfele, A., 1994. The Play-Within-the-Play in Hamlet. Renaissance Drama. 25, 131–154.

[6] Mehta, R., 2017. Haider: Adapting Hamlet in a Postcolonial Context. The Explicator. 75(3), 155–159.

[7] Burnett, M.T., 2017. Bollywood and Postcolonial Shakespeares: Vishal Bhardwaj's Haider. Literature/Film Quarterly. 45(2), 125–141.

[8] Trivedi, P., 2017. Haider and the Politics of Shakespeare in Postcolonial India. Critical Survey. 29(2), 39–54.

[9] Basu, S., 2018. Haider: Adapting Shakespeare in a Postcolonial Context. Journal of Postcolonial Studies. 21(2), 189–205.

[10] Burnett, M.T., 2013. Shakespeare and World Cinema. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–290.

[11] Desmet, C., 2014. Recognizing Shakespeare, Rethinking Fidelity: A Rhetoric and Ethics of Appropriation. In Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation, edited by Alexa Huang and Elizabeth Rivlin. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. pp. 41–58.

[12] Lanier, D.M., 2014. Shakespearean Rhizomatics: Adaptation, Ethics, Value. In: Huang, A., Rivlin, E. (Eds.). Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation, 21–40. Palgrave-Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–238.

[13] Trivedi, P., 2004. Introduction. In: Trivedi, P., Bartholomeusz, D. (Eds.). India's Shakespeare: Translation, Interpretation and Performance, 13–47. University of Delaware Press: Newark, DE, USA. pp. 1–303.

[14] Garcia-Periago, R.M., 2015. English Shakespeares in Indian Cinema: 36 Chowringhee Lane and The Last Lear. Borrowers and Lenders: The Journal of Shakespeare and Appropriation. 9(2), 63–86.

[15] Dionne, C., Kapadia, P., 2002. Shakespeare and Bollywood: The Difference a World Makes. In Bollywood Shakespeares. Palgrave Macmillan US: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–18.

[16] Vasudevan, R., 2011. The Melodramatic Public: Film Form and Spectatorship in Indian Cinema. Palgrave-Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–258.

[17] Rangan, B., 2014. ‘Haider'. Very well made, if a tad too footnote-heavy — but why ‘Hamlet'? Baradwaj Rangan. Available from: https://baradwajrangan.wordpress.com/2014/10/04/haider-very-well-made-if-a-tad-too-footnote-heavy-but-why-hamlet/ (cited 4 October 2014).

[18] Wilson, J.D., 1935. What Happens in Hamlet. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[19] Granville-Barker, H., 1927. Prefaces to Shakespeare. Sidgwick& Jackson: London, UK.

[20] Caldecott, T., 1832. Editing notes to Hamlet, and as You Like it. A Specimen of an Edition of Shakespeare. Edited by William Shakespeare. Printed for the author by William Nicol: London, UK.

[21] Mollin, A., 1994. On Hamlet's Mousetrap. Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy. 21(3), 353–372.

[22] Edelman, C., 1994. The very cunning of the scene': Claudius and the Mousetrap. Parergon. 12(1), 15–25.

[23] Brecht, B., 1964. A Short Organum for Theatre. In: Willett, J. (Ed.). Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Hill and Wang: New York, NY, USA. pp. 179–208.

[24] Slater, M., 2019. Hamlet in Kashmir: Political Allegory in Vishal Bhardwaj's Haider. Shakespeare Bulletin. 37(3), 365–390.

[25] Sen, A., 2019. Indigenizing Shakespeare: Haider and the politics of appropriation. In The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Global Appropriation. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 388–397.

[26] Desmet, C., Iyengar, S., Jacobson, M. (Eds.), 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Global Appropriation. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–14.

[27] Verma, R., 2018. Shakespeare in Indian Cinema: Appropriation, Assimilation, and Engagement. In The Shakespearean International Yearbook. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 83–96.

[28] Pandey, V., 2014. Haider: Why Is ‗Indian Hamlet‘Controversial? BBC News. 7.

[29] Trivedi, P., Chakravarti, M. (Eds.). 2019. Shakespeare in Contemporary Adaptation and Cultural Mobility. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 1–281.

[30] Burnett, M.T., 2019. ‘Hamlet' and World Cinema. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–192.

Downloads

How to Cite

Jaffar, N., Mohammed, L. A., & Saleem, M. (2024). Unveiling Spectatorship: Exploring Audience Engagement and Cultural Discourses in Hamlet’s ’Mousetrap’ and Haider’s ’Bismil’. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7172

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 6 (December 2024)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.