-
3265
-
2352
-
1520
-
1224
-
1025
Transformation as a Principle of Language Development (Based on the Material of the Armenian Language)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7332Abstract
Transformation, if all the changes that occur in a language are concentrated in it, represents the "living spirit" of its structure, which allows a huge array of all kinds of names and designations to create a dynamic world of human communication. The term has become especially used since the middle of the last century, after the publication of N. Chomsky's book "Syntactic Structures", however, it is used more in relation to syntactic structures, while not only word formation and form formation, but also syntax itself with its units are a product of transformations. If the latter are considered at the level of synchrony, they find a place in descriptive grammar and lexicology and are defined no more than units of the language system. If they are considered in diachrony, they clearly indicate the development of language and linguistic thinking. Since this is the first time the problem is posed in this way, the paper attempts to show the fruitfulness and importance of studying transformations in the history of one language, using the example of Armenian, described from the very beginning of the 5th century AD. The results, we think, are of great interest to the philosophy of language and the science of the development of thinking.
Keywords:
Transformation; Language Development; Armenia Language; Period of Development; Diachronic History of WordsReferences
[1] Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic structures. New in linguistics. Issue 11. Moscow. Russia. – Pp.412 – 527.
[2] Harris, Z.S., 1954. Distributional structure. “Linguistics today”. “Word”. 10, 1954. – Pp. 142-162.
[3] Sheyranyan, S. Z., 2021. Hidden forms of expression in Indo-European languages and their semantic valence. Research on linguistics and foreign language teaching. Yerevan, Armenia, An. Shirakatsi-Press. P. 47.
[4] Jahukyan, G.B., 1999. A universal linguistic theory. Prolegomena to substantive grammar. Moscow. Russia. – 560 p.
[5] 1913. History of Armenian Movsis Khorenatsvo. Tpkhis, Georgia. - Pp. 18-39.
[6] Koghbatsi, E., 1826. The sect of eresey Yeznkai Koghbatsvoy. Venice, Italy. - Pp.34
[7] Anhaght, D., 1960. The limit of rationality, Yerevan, Armenia. - P.14.
[8] Madoyan, V. V., 2022. Foreign language in a technical university: the experience of variation of the material and method. Proceedings of the III anniversary international conference "Actual problems of language training in a technical university". Collected articles. - P.30.
[9] 1836-37. New dictionary of Haykazian language, vv. A-B, Venice, Italy.
[10] Narekatsi, G., 1947.Book of tragedy, Buenos Aires, Argentina. – P.12.
[11] Arzruhvoy, T., 1887. History, Petersburg, Russia. – P.15.
[12] 2000. Bible. Book one and two. Ezr. - P. 196.
[13] Agatangeghel, 1909. History of Armenian, Tpkhis, Georgia. - P.24.
[14] Magistros, Gr., 1910. Papers, Alexandrapol, Armenia. – P.12.
[15] Malkhaseants, St., 1944-45. Armenian Explanatory Dictionary, vv. -4, Yerevan, Armenia.
[16] 1969-1980. Explanatory dictionary of the Modern Armenian language, vv. 1-4, Yerevan, Armenia.
[17] 1887. History of Armenians of the great Bishop Ghevondeyan. Petersburg, Russia, – P.19.
[18] Khorenatsvoi, M., 1865. Matenagroutionk, Venice, Italy. - P.14.
[19] 1999. Bible. Prophecy of Ezekiel. Yerevan, Armenia. – P.65.
[20] Catholicos, Yovh., 1912. History of Armenian, Tiflis, Georgia. – P.21.
[21] 1999. Bible. Proverbs of Solomon. Yerevan, Armenia. – P.94.
[22] Yeghishei, 1957. Pro Vardan and the Armenian War, Yerevan, Armenia. – P. 71.
[23] 1904. History of Armenian by Ghazaray Parpetsvoy, Tpkhis, Georgia. – P.45.
[24] Avetisyan, H., Ghazaryan, R., A-1987, B-1992. Dictionary of the Middle Armenian language. Yerevan, Armenia.
[25] Aghayan, Ed., 1976. Explanatory Dictionary of Modern Armenian. Yerevan, Armenia.
[26] Martirosyan, A., 2001. The study of verbal formations in the Armenian language. // Materials of the International Conference on Armenian Studies "The Armenian Language in Modern Society". Yerevan, Armenia. – P. 21.
[27] Eloyan, S., 2002. The dictionary of Modern Aneologisms, Yerevan, Armenia.
[28] Madoyan, V.V., 2014. Meaning and thought in the statics and dynamics of two languages. Moscow. Russia. - Pp.264-277.
[29] Sayat-Nova, Poems, Yerevan, Armenia, 2007. – Pp.19-23.
[30] Khachatryan, L., 1996. Semantic significance in stable phrases of the modern Armenian language.Yerevan. Armenia. - Pp. 79 -125.
[31] Gnatyuk O.A., 2024. On the issue of the differentiation of concepts: "synonymy", "variability", "parallelism" (theoretical review) // Philological aspect: international scientific and practical journal. Nizhny Novgorod, Russia: Scientific and publishing center "Open Knowledge", 2024. №3 (107). - P. 45. URL: https://scipress.ru/upload/philology/fa032024-1.pdf (date of application 18.04.2024).
[32] Müller, St., 2020. Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches. Fourth revised and extended edition. (Textbooks in Language Sciences 1). Berlin: Language Science Press. Germany. – P. 22
[33] Kabanova, S.A., 2019. Grammatical synonymy in the field of attributive constructions // Philology and culture. Kazan: Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University. Russia, 3(57), 38. DOI 10.26907/2074-0239-2019-57-3-38-46.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.