Applying Theme Types and Thematic Progression to Cohesion and Coherence of IELTSAcademic Writing Task 2: AQualitative Descriptive Study

Authors

  • Guodong Sun

    Faculty of Education Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Norhakimah Khaiessa Ahmad

    Faculty of Education Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Nur Raihan Che Nawi

    Faculty of Education Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7367
Received: 26 September 2024 | Revised: 16 October 2024 |Accepted: 25 October 2024 | Published Online: 9 December 2024

Abstract

Duetotheunsatisfied IELTS writing scores in the past decade, previous studies investigated the problems and solutions from lexical, syntactic, and task analysis perspectives. However, they ignored the influence of coherence and cohesion on the overall performance of IELTSAcademic Writing Task 2. Hence, the research conducted a qualitative descriptive study to writing cohesion and coherence of 15 practice essays of Chinese undergraduates under theme types and thematic progression of Functional Grammar. It initially analyzed the distributing features of themes and thematic progression patterns. It further adopted theme- and thematic progression-based writing rubrics to evaluate the coherence and cohesion of IELTS writing essays separately. The research findings showed that as the writing level of learners rose, dominant topical themes and constant thematic progression decreased, whereas textual themes and simple linear progression following them increased. They also revealed that learners achieved a higher cohesion in conjunctions and reiterations than in references and presented higher coherence in body parts than in introductions and conclusions. These results suggest that theme types and thematic progressions effectively reflect and evaluate coherent and cohesive performance in IELTS writing.

Keywords:

Theme Types; Thematic Progression Patterns; Coherence and Cohesion; IELTS Writing; Organization

References

[1] IELTS, 2024. Test taker performance 2023–2024. Available from: https://ielts.org/researchers/our-research/test-statistics (cited 4 December 2024).

[2] Liz, 2024. IELTS writing scoring: Are task 1 and task 2 equal value? Available from: https://ieltsliz.com/ielts-writing-scoring/ (cited 4 December 2024).

[3] Jafary, M., Amani, S.F., Benoit, B., 2023. Enhancing Writing Proficiency: The Role of Model Essays as Corrective Feedback Tools in IELTS Writing Task Achievement and Coherence/Cohesion. English Language Teaching. 16(11), 1–17.

[4] Liang, S., 2024. Documenting the Task Response Features of IELTS Writing Task 2, Band Scores 5–7 to Improve Teaching and Learning for Chinese Students Who Use IELTS Preparation Templates. The Educational Review, USA. 8(3), 355–362.

[5] Pratiwi, D.I., Faridi, A., Hartono, R., 2016. The Implementation of Mind Mapping Strategy to Teach Writing in IELTS Preparation Class. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan. 45(1), 33–41.

[6] Putri, A.S., Anshary, E.P., Sinar, T.S., et al., 2024. Analyzing Lexical Density and Readability in IELTS Band 4 Students' Writing Test. International Journal Linguistics of Sumatra and Malay. 2(2), 96–102.

[7] Arefsadr, S., Babaii, E., 2023. Let Their Voices be Heard: IELTS Candidates' Problems with the IELTS Academic Writing Test. TESL-EJ. 26(4), n4.

[8] Zhang, D.Y., 2020. Exploring IELTS Writing Problems in Universities from IELTS Writing Scoring Criteria. Modern Communication. (19), 188–190.

[9] Estaji, M., Hashemi, M., 2022. Phraseological Competence in IELTS Academic Writing Task 2: Phraseological Units and Test-Takers' Perceptions and Use. Language Testing in Asia. 12(1), 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00180-7

[10] Kalashi, S.A., Maftoon, P., 2024. The Effect of Teaching Lexical Cohesion on Improving IELTS Academic Writing Task 2. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice. 16(22), 67–81.

[11] Saadatara, A., Kiany, G., Talebzadeh, H., 2023. Bundles to Beat the Band in High-Stakes Tests: Pedagogical Applications of an Exploratory Investigation of Lexical Bundles across Band Scores of the IELTS Writing Component. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 61, 101208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101208

[12] Pratama, M.A., Munandar, A., 2024. Decoding IELTS Writing Performance: Grammatical Clauses Mastery by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan students. Notion: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture. 6(1), 112–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v6i1.9519

[13] Wang, S.J., Qiu, Q., 2020. The Status Quo and Countermeasures of Chinglish in Writing under Negative Transfer of Mother Tongue. Campus English. (6), 69–70.

[14] Yang, Y., Yap, N.T., Ali, A.M., 2022. A Review of Syntactic Complexity Studies in Context of EFL/ESL Writing. 12(10), 441–454. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/14843

[15] Rajeev, K., 2022. IELTS Translation Education Corpus Construction Based on Bilingual Non-Parallel Data Model. International Journal of Knowledge-based and Intelligent Engineering Systems. 25(4), 385–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/kes-210082

[16] Tieu, L.T.C., Baker, J.R., 2023. Using Model Essays in Conjunction with Noticing As a Feedback Instrument in IELTS Writing Preparation. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 17(2), 380–392.

[17] Xiong, M., Ye, N.Z., Xiong, Y., 2023. Reflection on the Teaching of IELTS Writing. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology. (6), 21–25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/curtm.2023.060405

[18] Zhang, Y., 2023. Cohesion and Coherence for English Writing—A Case Study of Argumentation. Frontiers in Educational Research. 6(9), 129–133.

[19] Al-Thunebat, S., AL-Masarwah, T.I., Almazaidah, I.S., 2024. The Duality of Cohesion and Coherence in Ibn Zurayq's Poem “Do Not Reproach Him”. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. 13(2), 227–239.

[20] Li, Q., 2024. Error Analysis of College English Writing Based on the Cohesion and Coherence Theory. International Journal of English Linguistics. 14(2), 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n2p73

[21] Wicaksono, R.R., Nurhamdah, N., Kalsum, K., 2023. The Analysis of IAIN Parepare Students' Academic Writing Levels on IELTS Preparation Class. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science. 2(2), 132–146.

[22] Anindita, W.K., 2024. Cohesion and Coherence Problems among Non-Native English Students' Writing Essays. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya. 14(1), 58–79.

[23] Marashi, S.M., 2020. Impact of Teaching Cohesive Devices to Iranian EFL Learners: Case of IELTS Writing Task 2 Examination. Online Submission. 6(2), 115–126.

[24] Nhung, L.T.K., Hiep, N.H., 2023. The Effects of Thematic Progression in Improving Coherence and Cohesion in EFL Writing. English Language Teaching. 16(6), 126–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n6p126

[25] Halliday, M.A.K., Matthiessen, C., 2014. Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 31, 89, 105–119.

[26] Daneš, F., 1974. Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. 23, 106–128.

[27] Jusoh, W.N.A.S.W., Jobar, N.A., Yusoff, M.Z.N.M., 2022. What is Thematic Progression in Students' Essay? Revision of Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 11(4), 1142–1164. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v11-i4/16090

[28] Islam, M.R., Rukmini, D., Fitriati, S.W., 2022. The Realization of Thematic Progression in the Essays of English Undergraduate Students. English Education Journal. 12(2), 183–191.

[29] Eggins, S., 2004. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2nd ed. Continuum: New York, NY, USA. pp. 299, 305.

[30] Thompson, G., 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 91–93, 147.

[31] Trung, N.T., Hoa, N.T.Q., 2022. An Investigation into the Textual Meaning in Academic IELTS Sample Essays. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 10(1), 16–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20221001.13

[32] Wei, J., 2015. Theme and Thematic Progression in Chinese College Students' English Essays. Springer: Singapore. pp. 1–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0254-0

[33] Liu, Q.Q., 2017. The Scoping Review of Thematic Progression. Profiles. (14), 243–244.

[34] Akinseye, T., 2020. Thematic Selection and Progression Patterns in L2 Theses Abstracts from Humanities and Science. Logos Et Littera. (7), 49–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31902/LL.2019.7.5

[35] Wang, S.Y., 2021. Analysis of the Thematic Progression Patterns in English News Discourse. English Literature and Language Review. 7(3), 59–63. DOI: https://doi. org/10.32861/ellr.73.59.63

[36] Sun, G.D., Ahmad, N.K., Nawi, N.R.C., 2024. Investigating the Application of Thematic Progression in EFL Writing: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 23(2), 294–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.14

[37] Ebrahimi, S.F., Ebrahimi, S.J., 2014. Thematic Progression Patterns in the IELTS Task 2 Writing. Journal of Advances in Linguistics. 3(3), 253–258.

[38] Nguyen, V.T., Nguyen, T.M.T., 2020. The Realization of Thematic Progression on Online IELTS Writing Task 2 Samples in an English-Learning Website: A Case Study. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies. 36(6), 134–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4634

[39] Soleymanzadeh, L., Gholami, J., 2014. Scoring Argumentative Essays Based on Thematic Progression Patterns and IELTS Analytic Scoring Criteria. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 98, 1811–1819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.610

[40] Okta, Z., Ashadi, A., Triyono, S., et al., 2023. Thematic Structure in Students' Writings: Implications on Their Ideas Organization and Development. Register Journal. 16(1), 49–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i1.49-72

[41] Saeed, A., Karim, S., Mughal, S.H., 2021. The Impact of Theme-Rheme Progression Method on Improving Textual Coherence and Cohesion in L2 Writing: A Study of L2 Learners of English. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 9(2), 83–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2021.0902.0115

[42] Struthers, L., Lapadat, J.C., MacMillan, P.D., 2013. Assessing Cohesion in Children's Writing: Development of a Checklist. Assessing Writing. 18(3), 187–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.001

[43] Astuti, Y.F., Suryani, F.B., Kurniati, D.,2010. The Analysis of Coherence in the Background of Skripsi Written by English Education Department Students of Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Muria Kudus University. Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya. 3(2), 1–15.

[44] Colorafi, K.J., Evans, B., 2016. Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 9(4), 16–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171

[45] Sandelowski, M., 2000. Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Research in Nursing Health. 23(4), 334–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

[46] Trung, N.T., Hoa, N.T.Q., 2018. An Analysis of Thematic Progression Strategies in Academic IELTS Sample Essays. International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language. 1(4), 85–93.

[47] Nguyen, T.T., 2024. A Contrastive Study of Theme Types in Academic IELTS Essays Written by English-Majored Students and IELTS Candidates. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology. 3(2), 30–42.

[48] Yang, S.T., 2020. The Application of Themes and Thematic Progression to Writing Instruction—A Case Study of IELTS Writing. (13), 206.

[49] Tuan, N.Q., Trang, N.T.B., Nhu, N.V.Q., 2023. Use of Cohesive Devices in Paragraph Writing by EFL Students at English Language Centers in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies. 39(3), 152–169.

[50] Mei, Y., 2023. Analysis of Second Language Writing Based on Discourse Coherence Theory—A Case Study of High School Students in a Chinese International School. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. 13, 177–183.

[51] Diep, G.L., Le, T.N.D., 2024. An Analysis of Coherence and Cohesion in English Majors' Academic Essays. International Journal of Language Instruction. 3(3), 1–21.

[52] Lyu, W., 2019. Application of Discourse Cohesion Theory in Systemic Functional Linguistics to Teaching IELTS writing. Journal of Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Electricity. 32(8), 129–30.

[53] Wang, S.Y., 2021. Analysis of the Thematic Progression Patterns in English News Discourse. English Literature and Language Review. 7(3), 59–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32861/ellr.73.59.63

Downloads

How to Cite

Sun, G., Ahmad, N. K., & Nawi, N. R. C. (2024). Applying Theme Types and Thematic Progression to Cohesion and Coherence of IELTSAcademic Writing Task 2: AQualitative Descriptive Study. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7367

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 6 (December 2024)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.