A Corpus-based Analysis of Four Near-synonymous English Verbs

Authors

  • Yara A. Jarrar

    Department of English Language and Literature, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan
  • Sa'ida W. Al-Sayyed

    Department of English Language and Literature, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan
  • Bayan B. Rababa'h

    Department of English Language, University of Jordan, Amman 19328, Jordan
  • Linda A. Alkhawaja

    Department of English Language and Literature, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7378
Received: 28 September 2024 | Revised: 17 October 2024 | Accepted: 23 October 2024 | Published Online: 10 December 2024

Abstract

The differences that exist among near-synonyms seem to be a thorny issue for native and non-native speakers of English. This study aims to highlight the similarities and differences between four near-synonymous verbs: investigate, explore, scrutinize, and examine, with a focus on their dialectal variations, frequencies, genre distributions, and colligational patterns. Data were gathered from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the British National Corpus (BNC). The findings reveal that while these verbs are often considered near-synonyms, they are not fully interchangeable across contexts. Explore and examine have scored the highest frequencies across both corpora, especially in academic genres in American English. In contrast, British English exhibits more variation, with investigate and explore appearing more frequently in non-academic texts. Conversely, scrutinize has scored the lowest in both dialects and is primarily confined to academic contexts. Additionally, these verbs are seldom found in spoken genres. The analysis of colligational behavior (i.e., grammatical patterns) demonstrates that these verbs share many grammatical patterns, though subtle differences in their usage prevent complete interchangeability. The COCA provides a wider range of grammatical patterns than those in the BNC. These findings underscore the complexity of near-synonymous verbs and the importance of context in their usage.

Keywords:

Academic Terms; Corpora; COCA; BNC; Dialects; Genre; Teaching; Learning; Lexical Relations

References

[1] Zeeland, H., Schmitt, N., 2013. Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics. 34(4), 457–479.

[2] Alsager, R., Milton, J., 2016. Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic success of Arabic undergraduate learners in Swansea University. Language in Focus Journal. 21–37.

[3] Schmitt, N., 2014. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning. 64(4), 913–951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077

[4] Nation, I., 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 60–101.

[5] Nation, I., 2011. Research into practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching. 44(4), 529–539.

[6] Nunan, D., 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teacher. Pre–ntice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. pp. 116–141.

[7] Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., 2020. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569057

[8] Shatanawi, H., 2024. The effect of phonetically or semantically related words on the tip of the tongue phenomena among a sample of Al Hafr Batin University students. Al-Balqa Journal for Research and Studies. 27(1), 173–192.

[9] Alkhawaja, L., 2024. Unveiling the new frontier: ChatGPT-3 powered translation for Arabic-English language pairs. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(2), 347–357.

[10] Khoury, O., Alkhawaja, L. Ghnaim, F., et al., 2024. Post-editing a google translated output: experienced translators vs. trainees. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(6), 1745–1756.

[11] Clenton, J., Booth, P. (Eds.), 2020. Vocabulary and the Four Skills: Pedagogy, Practice, and Implications for Teaching Vocabulary, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK.

[12] Laufer, B., 1990. Words you know: How they affect the words you learn. In: Fisiak, J. (Ed.). Further Insights into Contrastive Linguistics. Benjamins: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 572–593.

[13] Laufer, B., 1990. Ease and difficulty in vocabulary learning: Some teaching implications. Foreign Language Annals. 23(2), 147–155.

[14] Cruse, A., 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[15] Jackson, H., Amvela, E., 2000. Words, Meaning and Vocabulary: Meaning Relations. Athenaum Press: Cambridge, UK.

[16] Phoocharoensil, S., 2010. A corpus-based study of English synonyms. International Journal of Arts and Sciences. 3(10), 227–245.

[17] Edmonds, P., Hirst, G., 2002. Near-synonyms and lexical choice. Computational Linguistics. 28(2), 105–144.

[18] Tsui, A., 2004. What teachers have always wanted to know- and how corpora can help. In: Sinclair, J. (Ed). How to use corpora in language teaching? John Benjamin’s Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 39–61.

[19] McEnery, T., Wilson, A., 1996. What is corpus linguistics? Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK.

[20] Hussein, R., Haider, A., Al-Sayyed, S., 2021. A corpus-driven study of terms used to refer to articles and methods in research abstracts in the fields of economics, education, English literature, nursing, and political science. Journal of Educational and Social Research. 11(3), 119–131.

[21] Kurdi, A., 2019. The problem of terrorism as a term: Its linguistic, Islamic definitions and its actual use in contemporary reality, Al-Balqa Journal for Research and Studies. 22(1),105–117.

[22] Sayyed, S., Al-Khanji, R., 2019. A corpus-based analysis of eight English synonymous adjectives of fear. International Journal of Linguistics. 11(1), 111–138.

[23] Qarqaz, A., 2024. Words of love in meaning dictionaries, a semantic study in the light of analytical theory. Al-Balqa Journal for Research and Studies. 27(1), 78–91.

[24] Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[25] Bolinger, D., 1968. Aspects of Language. Harcourt Brace: Orlando, FL, USA.

[26] Francis, D., Hunston, S., 2000. A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

[27] Lindquist, H., 2009. Corpus linguistics and description of English. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK.

[28] Crystal, D., 2003. English as a global language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[29] Aston, G., 2001. Text categories and corpus users: a response to David Lee. Language Learning & Technology. 5(3), 73–76.

[30] Palmer, F., 1981. Semantics, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[31] Kachru, B.B., 1995. World Englishes: Approaches, issues and resources. Language Teaching. 25, 1–14. Reprinted in: Douglas Brown, H., Gonzo, S.T. (Eds.). Readings on second language acquisition. Prentice Hall Regents: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. pp. 229–261. (First published in 1992).

[32] Widdowson, H.G., 1997. EIL, ESL, EFL: Global issues and local interests. World Englishes. 16(1), 135–146.

[33] Lewis, M., 2000. Language in the lexical approach. In: Lewis, M. (Ed.), Teaching collocation: Further developments in the lexical approach. Language Teaching Publications: London, UK. pp. 133–134.

[34] Flowerdew, J., 2012. Corpora and language education. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.

[35] Chung, S., 2011. A corpus-based analysis of “create” and “produce”. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 4(2), 399–425.

[36] Phitayakorn, W., 2016. A corpus-based study of English synonyms: Advise, recommend, and suggest. Thammasat University: Khlong Nueng, Thailand.

[37] GU, B., 2017. Corpus-based study of two synonyms-obtain and gain. Sino-US English Teaching. 14(8), 511–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2017.08.006.

[38] Li, E., 2019. A corpus-assisted study of synonyms in EFL teaching: Take preserve and conserve as examples. Linguistics and Literature Studies. 7(2), 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2019.070201.

[39] Séguin, M., 2020. Corpus based study of verbs explain and. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics. 8(2), 144–184.

[40] Song, Q., 2021. Effectiveness of corpus in distinguishing two near-synonymous verbs: Damage and destroy. English Language Teaching. 14(7), 8–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p8

[41] Xi, Y., 2021. A Corpus-based study on semantic prosody of English synonyms declare and announce. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education (ICBDIE); Hangzhou, China, 2–4 April 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDIE52740.2021.00151

[42] Kruawong, T., Phoocharoensil, S., 2022. A genre and collocational analysis of the near-synonyms teach, educate and instruct: A corpus-based approach. TEFLIN Journal. 33(1), 75–97.

[43] Sittironnarit, S., Khunasathitchai, K., Kosashunhanan, K., Kumdee, S., 2022. A corpus-based analysis of English synonyms: Acquire and obtain. Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi. 7(9), 242–252.

[44] Alanazi, Z., 2023. Corpus-based analysis of near-synonymous verbs. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 15, 1–25.

[45] Niwesworakarn, N., Phoocharoensil, Petkaew, J., Intasingh, S., 2023. Collocational patterns of the synonyms join, participate, and attend: A corpus-based study. The International Journal of Communication and Linguistic Studies. 22(1), 63–77.

Downloads

How to Cite

Jarrar, Y. A., Al-Sayyed, S. W., Rababa’h, B. B., & Alkhawaja, L. A. (2024). A Corpus-based Analysis of Four Near-synonymous English Verbs. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7378

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 6 (December 2024)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.