Task-Based Language Assessment: A Case Study in Effectiveness in EFL Contexts

Authors

  • Abdullah Alshakhi

    English Language Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
  • Marwan Albalawi

    English Language Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7515
Received: 22 October 2024 | Revised: 2 November 2024 | Accepted: 15 November 2024 | Published Online: 12 December 2024

Abstract

Language assessment bears profound influence on language learning, especially in foreign language teaching and learning environments. Formative assessment using feedback and correctional strategies facilitates learning very effectively. Task-based language assessment (henceforth TBLA) employed as a formative assessment technique is a comparatively new assessment model. The present paper discusses the results obtained from a qualitative study conducted with undergraduate students at a Saudi university investigating the effectiveness of TBLA as an assessment technique as well as a learning aid helping learners improve their writing skills. Observation, semi-structured interview, and document analysis were used as data collection instruments in the study. The findings show that TBLA aligns very strongly with the given syllabus objectives and enhances learners’ language use and higher order thinking skills. The findings of the present study have serious pedagogical implications in Saudi Arabian EFL contexts as the technique is found to be effective in improving learners’ English writing skills.

Keywords:

Task-Based Language Teaching; TBLA; Formative Assessment; Writing Skills; English as a Foreign Language

References

[1] Black, P., Wiliam, D., 1998. Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policies, and Practices. 5(1), 7-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

[2] Coombe, C., Davidson, P., O’Sullivan, B., Stoynoff, S. (eds.)., 2012. The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Assessment. Cambridge University Press.

[3] Noroozi, M., Taheri, S., 2022. Task-Based Language Assessment: A Compatible Approach to Assess the Efficacy of Task-Based Language Teaching vs. Present, Practice, Produce. Cogent Education. 9(1), 2105775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2105775

[4] Alahmadi, N., Alrahaili, M., Alshraideh, D., 2019. The Impact of Formative Assessment in Speaking Tests on Saudi Students’ Performance. Arab World English Journal. 10(1), 259-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.22

[5] Wiliam D., 2011. Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree Press. https://archive.org/details/embeddedformativ0000wili

[6] Sudharshana, N.P., Mukhopadhyay, L., 2021. Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment: Contemporary Reflections from Across the World. Springer Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4226-5

[7] Van Gorp, K., Deygers. B., 2013. Task-Based Language Assessment. In: Kunnan, A.J. (ed.). The Companion to Language Assessment: Vol. 2. Approaches and Development. Wiley-Blackwell. 578–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla058

[8] Brindley, G., 1994. Task-Centred Assessment in Language Learning Programs: The Promise and the Challenge. In: Bird, N., Falvey, P., Tsui, A., Allison, D., McNeill, A. (eds.). Language and Learning. Institute of Language in Education. 73–94. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED386045

[9] Long, M.H., Norris, J.M., 2000. Task-Based Language Teaching and Assessment. In: Byram, M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Language Teaching. Routledge. 597–603.

[10] Brindley, G., 2012. Task-Based Assessment. In: Chapelle, C. (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley & Sons. 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1141

[11] Ellis, R., 2003. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press.

[12] Norris, J.M., 2016. Current Uses for Task-Based Language Assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 36, 230–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000027

[13] Bachman, L.F., 2002. Some Reflections on Task-Based Language Performance Assessment. Language Testing. 19(4), 453-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt240oa

[14] Chalhoub-Deville, M., 2001. Task-Based Assessments: Characteristics and Validity Evidence. In: Bygate, M., Skehan, P., Swain, M. (eds.). Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Routledge. 210–28.

[15] Elder, C., Iwashita, N., McNamara, T., 2002. Estimating the Difficulty of Oral Proficiency Tasks: What does the Test-Taker have to Offer? Language Testing. 19(4), 347-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt235oa

[16] Byrnes, H., 2002. The Role of Task and Task-Based Assessment in a Content-Oriented Collegiate Foreign Language Curriculum. Language Testing. 19(4), 419-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt238oa

[17] Ke, C., 2006. A Model of Formative Task-Based Language Assessment for Chinese as a Foreign Language. Language Assessment Quarterly. 3(2), 207-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0302_6

[18] Sarıgöz, I.H., Fişne, F.N., 2019. Integration of Task-Based Language Assessment into Young Learner Classrooms. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 5(3), 403-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.651391

[19] Norris, J.M., 2009. Task-Based Teaching and Testing. In: Long, M.H., Doughty, C.J. (eds.). The Handbook of Language Teaching. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch30

[20] Liu, Q., 2018. Application of Task-Based Language Assessment in College English Writing Teaching. Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Economic Development and Education Management (ICEDEM 2018). 404–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icedem-18.2018.101

[21] Chen, S., Wang, J., 2019. Effects of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) Approach and Language Assessment on Students’ Competences in Intensive Reading Course. English Language Teaching. 12(3), 119-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n3p119

[22] Almossa, S.Y., 2021. Assessment Practices in English Language Courses in Saudi Public Universities. Collated Papers for the ALTE 7th International Conference. Madrid, Spain. 175–178. https://www.alte.org/IntConfProceedings

[23] Creswell, J.W., 2013. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. SAGE.

[24] Pathak, V., Jena, B., Kalra, S., 2013. Qualitative Research. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 4(3), 192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.115389

[25] Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N., 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 4th ed. SAGE.

[26] Dwyer, S.C., Buckle, J.L., 2009. The Space between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 8(1), 54–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105

[27] Brown, J.D., Hudson, T., 2002. Criterion-Referenced Language Testing. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524803

[28] Creswell, J.W., Miller, D.L., 2000. Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice. 39(3), 124–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

[29] Gross J., 2018. Document Analysis. In: Frey, B. (ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement and Evaluation. SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n209

[30] Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal. 9(2), 27–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

[31] Braun V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[32] Brown, H.D., 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education.

[33] Norris, J.M., 2018. Task-Based Language Assessment Aligning Designs with Intended Uses and Consequences. JLTA Journal. 21, 3-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20622/jltajournal.21.0_3

[34] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[35] Amineh, R.J., Asl, H.D., 2015. Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages. 1(1), 9–16. https://www.blueap.com/j/List/4/iss/volume%2001%20(2015)/issue%2001/2.pdf

[36] Miri, B., David, B.C., Uri, Z., 2007. Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of Higher-Order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking. Research in Science Education. 37(4), 353–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2

[37] Dikli, S., 2003. Assessment at a Distance: Traditional vs. Alternative Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2(3), 13–19. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v2i3/232.pdf

[38] Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L., 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist. 55(1), 68–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

[39] Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., et al., 2004. Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom. Phi Delta Kappan. 86(1), 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408600105

Downloads

How to Cite

Alshakhi, A., & Albalawi, M. (2024). Task-Based Language Assessment: A Case Study in Effectiveness in EFL Contexts. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 929–946. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7515

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 6 (December 2024)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.