How AI Affects the Pragmatic Function in Media Discourse: A French Press Perspective

Authors

  • Batoul M. Al-Muhaissen

    Modern Language Department, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
  • Samer Al-Hammouri

    Modern Language Department, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
  • Kossay M. Rachdan

    Modern Language Department, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
  • Mohammed Habes

    Radio and TV Department, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7800
Received: 18 November 2024 | Revised: 11 December 2024 | Accepted: 16 December 2024 | Published Online: 25 December 2024

Abstract

This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence on the pragmatic function of the French press, by analyzing the role of this advanced technology in changing the methods of collecting, editing, and analyzing news. This research aimed to comprehend the role and effect of artificial intelligence technology on news media practices in France, the quality of content and the prevailing challenges. The researchers used a qualitative design and gathered data using semi structured interview questionnaires. A sample of 15 participants is selected and further data is analyzed using content analysis approach. The results showed that artificial intelligence is widely utilized to enhance the quality of content by streamlining the content creation, design, and sharing process. Besides, the relevant technology helps French news media organizations to manage redundant tasks and enable journalists to focus on more areas. It is found that AI algorithms are also employed to analyze vast amounts of data, facilitating the speed and accuracy of content. However, the study participants indicated some ethical concerns such as bubble filter and bias, further emphasizing the needs to counteract these ethical dilemmas. Therefore, this research implied that AI technology enhances the pragmatic role of French news media organizations by facilitating productivity and quality of content. While it offers many benefits, it is crucial to address the ethical issues revolving around bias and bubble filters.

Keywords:

AI; French Press; Media Discourse; Content Personalization; Journalistic Automation; Pragmatic Function

References

[1] Trapova, A., Mezei, P., 2022. Robojournalism-A Copyright Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the European News Industry. GRUR International. 71(7), 589–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7916/D80G3XDJ

[2] Karabulatova, I., 2020. Possibilities of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing the Impact of Potentially Dangerous Texts in Modern News Discourse: Problem of Statement. SHS Web of Conferences. 88, 01001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208801001

[3] Simon, F. M., 2023. Artificial Intelligence in the News How AI Retools, Rationalizes, and Reshapes Journalism and the Public Arena. Columbia University Libraries: New York, NY, USA. pp. 77–89.

[4] Bareis, J., Katzenbach, C., 2022. Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics. Science Technology and Human Values. 47(5), 855–881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007

[5] Serdouk, A., Bessam, A.C., 2023. Bots in Newsrooms: What Future for Human Journalists? Media Watch. 14(1), 100–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09760911221130816

[6] Secova, M., 2011. Discourse‐pragmatic features of spoken French: analysis and pedagogical implications [Ph.D. Thesis]. Queen Mary University of London.

[7] Dandurand, G., McKelvey, F., Roberge, J., 2023. Freezing Out: Legacy Media’s Shaping of AI as a Cold Controversy. Big Data and Society. 10(2), 20539517231219242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231219242

[8] Durmus, E., Ladhak, F., Cardie, C., 2020. The Role of Pragmatic and Discourse Context in Determining Argument Impact. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP); November 2019 ; Hong Kong, China. pp. 5668–5678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1568

[9] Mieczkowski, H., Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., et al., 2021. AI-mediated communication: Language use and interpersonal effects in a referential communication task. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–14.

[10] Zagorulko, D.I., 2023. Chatgpt in Newsrooms: Adherence of AI-Generated Content to Journalism Standards and Prospects for its Implementation in Digital Media. Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Philology. Journalism. 2(1), 319–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2710-4656/2023.1.2/50

[11] Peña-Fernández, S., Meso-Ayerdi, K., Larrondo-Ureta, A., et al., 2023. Without Journalists, There is No Journalism: The Social Dimension of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Media. Profesional de La Informacion. 32(2), e320227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.27

[12] Arguedas, A.R., Simon, F.M., 2023. Automating Democracy Automating Democracy Generative AI, Journalism, and the Future of Democracy. Balliol Interdisciplinary Institute: University of Oxford, US. pp. 34–48.

[13] Brennen, J.S., Howard, P.N., Nielsen, R.K., 2022. What to Expect When You’re Expecting Robots: Futures, Expectations, and Pseudo-Artificial General Intelligence in UK News. Journalism. 23(1), 22–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920947535

[14] Hermann, I., 2023. Artificial Intelligence in Fiction: Between Narratives and Metaphors. AI and Society. 38(1), 319–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-6

[15] Laï, M.C., Brian, M., Mamzer, M.F., 2020. Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Findings from a Qualitative Survey Study among Actors in France. Journal of Translational Medicine. 18(1), 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-02204-y

[16] Ayşen Akkor Gül, E., Dilek Ertürk, Y., Elmer, P., 2022. Digital Transformation in Media & Society. Istanbul University Press: Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 98–112.

[17] Buhmann, A., Fieseler, C., 2021. Towards a Deliberative Framework for Responsible Innovation in Artificial Intelligence. Technology in Society. 64, 101475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101475

[18] Tessem, B., Tverberg, A., Borch, N., 2024. The Future Technologies of Journalism. Procedia Computer Science. 239, 96–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.151

[19] Benmelit, S., 2024. Algorithmic Journalism and Metaverse Media Innovative Prospects in Digital Content Creation. International Journal of Social Communication. 209, 23–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53284/2120-011-003-013

[20] Díaz-Noci, J., 2020. Artificial Intelligence Systems-Aided News and Copyright: Assessing Legal Implications for Journalism Practices. Future Internet. 12(5), 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/FI12050085

[21] Von Richthofen, A., 2020. Aurel Von Richthofen, on Tools, Technology and Society around the Future of AI and Architecture. Architectural Research Quarterly. 24(4), 379–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135521000075

[22] Cardaş-Răduţa, D.L., 2024. The Effectiveness and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism. SAECULUM. 57(1), 111–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2024-0009

[23] Porlezza, C., 2023. Promoting Responsible AI: A European Perspective on the Governance of Artificial Intelligence in Media and Journalism. Communications. 48(3), 370–394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0091

[24] Negreira, M.C., Jorge Vázquez-Herrero, R., Sixto-García, J., et al., 2023. Studies in Big Data 140 Blurring Boundaries of Journalism in Digital Media New Actors, Models and Practices. Springer Nature: Germany. pp. 678–693.

[25] Gasnier, C., 2024. Impact of AI Generated Images in the Work Field of Journalism [Master Thesis]. Prague, CZ: Charles University. pp. 16–34.

[26] González-Arias, C., López-García, X., 2024. Rethinking the Relation between Media and Their Audience: The Discursive Construction of the Risk of Artificial Intelligence in the Press of Belgium, France, Portugal, and Spain. Journalism and Media. 5(3), 1023–1037.

[27] Noain Sánchez, A., 2022. Addressing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Journalism: The Perception of Experts, Journalists and Academics.

[28] Roe, J., Perkins, M., 2023. ‘What they’re Not Telling You about ChatGPT’: Exploring the Discourse of AI in UK News Media Headlines. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 10(1), 753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02282-w

[29] Al-Muhaissen, B.M., Al Jwaniat, M.I., Tahat, Z.Y., et al., 2024. The Pragmatic Function of Press Discourse Markers in French Language. Springer Nature. 1, 155–165.

[30] Capatina, A., Kachour, M., Lichy, J., et al., 2020. Matching the Future Capabilities of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Software for Social Media Marketing with Potential Users’ Expectations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 151, 119794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119794

[31] Meier, K., Schützeneder, J., García Avilés, J.A., et al., 2022. Examining the Most Relevant Journalism Innovations: A Comparative Analysis of Five European Countries from 2010 to 2020. Journalism and Media. 3(4), 698–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3040046

[32] Chen, Y., 2023. A Contrastive Study of the Use of Discourse Markers by English Learners and Native Speakers. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies. 17, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2023.17.1

[33] Feng, G., 2008. Pragmatic Markers in Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics. 40(10), 1687–1718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.05.012

[34] Hussein, M., 2008. Two Accounts of Discourse Markers in English. 49(2002), 75–86.

[35] Mahony, S., Chen, Q., 2024. Concerns about the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism, and Media Manipulation. Journalism. 9(1), 14648849241263292.

[36] Dörr, K., 2023. Artificial Intelligence and Ethical Journalism. In: Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. pp. 138–141.

[37] Aijmer, K., 2015. Analysing Discourse Markers in Spoken Corpora: Actually as a Case Study. Springer Nature: London, UK. pp. 88–109.

[38] Ulyanova, U.A., Petrochenko, L.A., 2015. Discourse Elements in the Missing Manual. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 200, 595–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.043

[39] Alami, M., 2015. Pragmatic Functions of Discourse Markers: A Review of Related Literature. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature. 3(3), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3034.3121

[40] Li, Q., 2016. A Case Study on the Pragmatic Use of Discourse Markers. Canadian Social Science, 12(11), 106–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3968/9032

[41] Shakarami, A., Hajhashemi, K., Caltabiano, N., 2016. Digital Discourse Markers in an ESL Learning Setting: The Case of Socialisation Forums. International Journal of Instruction. 9(2), 167–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9212a

[42] Liu, X., 2017. The Meta-Pragmatic Functions of English Discourse Markers. Proceedings of the 2016 7th International Conference on Education, Management, Computer and Medicine (EMCM 2016); Feb 2017; Paris, France. pp. 467–471.

[43] Lopez Villegas, C., 2019. Discourse and Pragmatic Markers in Spoken and Written Everyday Life. March. 8(3), 0–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33992.57602

[44] Gao, Y., 2023. Analyse the Function of Discourse Markers Using in Naturally Occurring Discourses and Planned Speeches. SHS Web of Conferences. 179, 01027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317901027

[45] Usarova Yakubovna, N., 2024. Discourse Markers and Cohesive Devices in Uzbek and English Legends. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348756006_The_Role_of_Discourse_Markers_and_Cohesive_Devices_in_Writing_EFL_Students_a_Case_Study

[46] Dijkstra, A.M., de Jong, A., Boscolo, M., 2024. Quality of Science Journalism in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Explored with a Mixed Methodology. PloS One. 19(6), e0303367.

[47] Alshakhanbeh, Z.M., Domi, M.K.B., Habes, M., 2024. Petra News Agency coverage of events in Palestine, Jerusalem, Iraq, Syria: An Analytical Study. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences. 51(4), 271–286.

[48] Attar, R.W., Habes, M., Almusharraf, A., et al., 2024. Exploring the Impact of Smart Cities on Improving the Quality of Life for People with Disabilities in Saudi Arabia. Frontiers in Built Environment. 10(3), 1398425.

[49] Habes, M., Alanani, A., Youssef, E., et al., 2024. Why Do Jordanian Students Prefer Using ChatGPT A Case Study of Higher Education Institutions. Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Power and Dangers of ChatGPT in the Classroom. Springer Nature. pp. 127–141.

[50] Mansoori, A., Tahat, K., Tahat, D.N., et al., 2024. Optimizing News Categorization with Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Study Using Naive Bayes (MultinomialNB) Classifier. In Achieving Sustainable Business through AI, Technology Education and Computer Science: Cham: Springer Nature, Switzerland. pp. 169–178.

[51] Tahat, K., Habes, M., Mansoori, A., et al., 2024. Social Media Algorithms in Countering Cyber Extremism: A Systematic Review. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 8(8), 6632.

[52] Bdoor, S.Y., Habes, M., 2024. Use Chat GPT in Media Content Production Digital Newsrooms Perspective. In Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Power and Dangers of ChatGPT in the Classroom. Cham: Springer Nature, Switzerland. pp. 545–561.

[53] Tahat, K., Mansoori, A., Tahat, D.N., et al., 2023. Leveraging Soft Power: A Study of Emirati Online Journalism through Arabic Topic Modeling. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business and Technology (ICBT2023); 2–3 November 2023; Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 13–20.

[54] Acharya, A., Prakash, A., Saxena, P., et al., 2013. Sampling: Why and How of it? Anita S Acharya, Anupam Prakash, Pikee Saxena, Aruna Nigam. Indian Journal of Medical Specilaities. 15(14), 330–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7713/ijms.2013.0032

[55] Setia, M.S., 2016. Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-Sectional Studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology. 61(3), 261–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410

[56] Wani, S.R., 2017. Population and Sample. M.A. Edu/Research Methodology/Sampling. Available from: https://ddeku.edu.in/Files/2cfa4584-5afe-43ce-aa4b-ad936cc9d3be/Custom/Sampling.pdf

[57] Ponce, A., Castillo, D., 2022. Artificial Intelligence, Labour and Society. ETUI aisbl, Brussels. pp. 76–98.

Downloads

How to Cite

Al-Muhaissen, B. M., Al-Hammouri, S., Rachdan, K. M., & Habes, M. (2025). How AI Affects the Pragmatic Function in Media Discourse: A French Press Perspective. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7800

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 1 (January 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Batoul M. Al-Muhaissen, Samer Al-Hammouri, Kossay M. Rachdan, Mohammed Habes

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.