The Enhanced Adaptive PPP Model: A Novel Framework for Revolutionizing Test-Taking Strategies in Language Assessment

Authors

  • Abdullah A. Al Fraidan

    Department of English Language, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7918
Received: 21 November 2024 | Revised: 9 December 2024 | Accepted: 13 December 2024 | Published Online: 23 December 2024

Abstract

This study revisits and expands the Presage, Process, Product (PPP) model to propose a dynamic and interactive framework for language learning. The enhanced model emphasizes the reciprocal relationships among presage factors (learner characteristics and contextual influences), process strategies (approaches to learning and engagement), and product outcomes (performance and broader competencies). By integrating culturally relevant content, digital tools, and feedback-driven strategy refinement, the revised model addresses the evolving needs of learners in diverse educational contexts, particularly within Saudi Arabia. This approach bridges traditional and modern pedagogies, advocating for adaptive, student-centered practices that align with cultural priorities and real-world applications. The study highlights the interplay of stages, showcasing how feedback from outcomes can shape future learning behaviors. Implications for instructional design, assessment, and technology integration are explored, offering educators a comprehensive framework for fostering meaningful and transferable learning experiences.

Keywords:

Presage Process Product Model; Language Learning; Cultural Relevance; Digital Tools; Adaptive Learning; Saudi Arabia

References

[1] Wen, Q., Johnson, R., 1997. L2 Learner variables and English acheivment: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics. 18(1), 27–48.

[2] Cohen, A.D., 1998. Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Longman: London, UK. pp. 1–417

[3] Al Fraidan, A., 2024. Unveiling Students Test Strategizing Through the Lens of Monitor Theory: Teaching Insights. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(2), 1181.

[4] Macaro, E., 2006. Strategies for Language Learning: Theoretical Perspectives. Journal of Language and Education. 22(4), 423–450.

[5] Phakiti, A., 2003. Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use in IELTS Reading Tests. IELTS Research Reports. 4, 17–50.

[6] Al Fraidan, A., Alkhalaf, M., 2012. Test-Taking Strategies of Arab EFL Learners on Multiple-Choice Tests. International Education Studies. 5(4), 80–85.

[7] Al Fraidan, A., Alsalman, H., 2023. The Utilization of Test-Taking Strategies by High Schoolers in Saudi Arabia. World English Language Journal. 13(2), 414–423.

[8] Al Fraidan, A., 2024a. Beyond the Bubble: Unveiling the Multifaceted Landscape of Test Wiseness and Their Operationalization Among English Language Majors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(6), 1735–1744.

[9] Al Fraidan, A., 2024. The Impact of Students' Misperceptions on Test Performance: A 3P Model and Self-Determination Theory Approach. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 8(5), 1773–1784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1895

[10] Al Fraidan, A., 2024. Interplay of Language Proficiency, Gender, Test Anxiety, and Cognitive Strategies: The Spectrum of Guessing Behaviors in Multiple-Choice Assessments Among Saudi EFL Learners. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 8(6), 1148–1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1895

[11] Al Fraidan, A., 2024. Anticipatory Thinking and AI-Driven Assessments: A Balanced Approach to AI Integration in Education Aligned with Saudi Vision 2030. African Journal of Biomedical Research. 27(3), 619–628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i3.2560

[12] Al Fraidan, A., Olaywi, M., 2024. Scenarios to Implement Metaverse into the Saudi Educational System. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(4), 180–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6853

[13] Al-Seghayer, K., 2022. Continued Concerns in Language Assessment Practices in Saudi Arabian English Education. Education, Language, and Sociology Research. 3(3), 55–72.

[14] Umer, M., Al-Harbi, M., Al-Harbi, K., 2018. Improving Language Assessment Literacy for In-Service Saudi EFL Teachers. Arab World English Journal. 9(1), 1–26.

[15] Cohen, A.D., 1991. Strategies in second-language learning: Insights from research. In: Phillipson, R., Kellerman, E., Selinker, L., et al. (Eds.). Foreign/second language pedagogy research: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch. Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, UK. pp. 107–119.

[16] Cohen, A.D., Macaro, E., 2007. Language Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice. In: Cohen, A.D. (ed.). Language Learner Strategies. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 123–145.

[17] Macaro, E., 2001. Learning Strategies in Foreign and Second Language Classrooms. Continuum UK. pp. 1–218.

[18] McDonough, S., 1995. Strategy and Skill in Learning a Foreign Language. Edward Arnold: London, UK. pp. 1–160.

[19] McDonough, S., 1999. Learner Strategies. Language Teaching. 32, 1–18.

[20] Phakiti, A., 2003. A Closer Look at Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in L2 Testing. Language Testing Journal. 20(1), 26–56.

[21] Oxford, R., 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Newbury, House Publishers: Rowley, Mass. pp. 1–342.

[22] Rubin, J., 1987. Learner Strategies: Theoretical Assumptions, Research History and Typology. In: Wenden, A., Rubin, J. (eds.). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Prentice Hall: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–301.

[23] Sarig, G., 1987. High-Level Reading in the First and in the Foreign Language: Some Comparative Process Data. In: Carrell, P., Devine, J., Eskey, D. (eds.). Research in Reading English as a Second Language. TESOL: Washington, DC, USA. pp.105–120.

[24] Stern, H.H., 1975. What Can We Learn from the Good Language Learner? Canadian Modern Language Review. 31, 304–318.

[25] Alexander, P.A., Graham, S., Harris, K.R., 1998. A Perspective on Strategy Research: Progress and Prospects. Educational Psychology Review. 10, 129–154.

[26] Dörnyei, Z., Skehan, P., 2003. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. In: Doughty, C.J., Long, M.H. (eds.). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell: Malden, MA, USA; Oxford, UK. pp. 589–630.

[27] Cohen, A.D., 2007. Language Learner Strategies: 30 Years of Research and Practice. In: Cohen, A.D. (ed.). Language Learner Strategies. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 15–30.

[28] Krashen, S.D., 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman: London, UK. pp. 1–128.

[29] Krashen, S., 1988. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Pergamon Press: London, UK. pp. 1–138.

[30] Anderson, J., 1976. Language, Memory and Thought. Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA. pp. 1–542.

[31] Anderson, J., 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 1–340.

[32] Anderson, J., 1993. Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA. pp. 1–330.

[33] Anderson, J., 1996. A Simple Theory of Complex Cognition. American Psychologist. 51, 355–365.

[34] Bialystok, E., 1990. Communication Strategies: A Psychological Analysis of Second Language Use. Basil Blackwell: Oxford, UK. pp. 1–172.

[35] Chamot, A., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P., et al., 1996. Methods for Teaching Learner Strategies in the Foreign Language Classroom. In: Oxford, R.L. (ed.). Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. University of Hawaii, Honolulu: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. pp. 175–187.

[36] Faerch, C., Kasper, G., 1987. From Product to Process: Introspective Methods in Second Language Research. In: Faerch, C., Kasper, G. (eds.). Introspection in Second Language Research. Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, Avon, UK. pp. 1–4.

[37] Ellis, R., 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press: London, UK. pp. 1–1176

[38] Davies, F., 1995. Introducing Reading. Penguin: London, UK. pp. 1–190.

[39] Scholfield, P., 1997. Vocabulary Reference Works in Foreign Language Learning. In: Schmitt, N., McCarthy, M. (eds.). Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, pp. 279–302. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–400.

[40] Faerch, C., Kasper, G., 1983. Plans and Strategies in Foreign Language Communication. In: Faerch, C., Kasper, G. (eds.). Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. Longman: London, UK. pp. 20–60.

[41] Graham, S., 1997. Effective Language Learning Strategies: A Study of High-Achieving Learners. Language Learning Journal. 25(1), 3–16.

[42] Neubach, A., Cohen, A.D., 1988. Processing Strategies Used in Second Language Reading Tests. Applied Linguistics. 9(3), 221–246.

[43] Laviosa, S., 2000. The Use of Strategies in Language Testing. Modern Language Review. 95(2), 22–40.

[44] Addamegh, A., 2003. Test-Taking Strategies of Saudi EFL Learners: A Study on Multiple-Choice and Cloze Test Formats [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of Essex: Colchester, UK. pp. 1–300.

[45] Chamot, A.U., Küpper, L., 1989. Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics. 10(2), 13–35.

[46] Dörnyei, Z., 2001. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–153.

[47] Brown, D.H., 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education: London, UK. pp. 1–369.

[48] Oxford, R.L., 1996. Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-cultural Perspectives. University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA. pp. 1–283.

[49] Wenden, A., 1987. Conceptual Background and Utility. In: Wenden, A., Rubin, J. (eds.). Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Prentice Hall: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–301.

[50] Chamot, A., 2005. Language Learning Strategy Instruction: Current Issues and Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 25, 112–130.

[51] Al Fraidan, A., 2024. Direct vs. Indirect Listening Assessments: A Comparative Study of Gap-Filling and Cloze Tests on Social Media Using AI. Library Progress International: Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. pp. 16097–16104.

[52] Purpura, J.E., 1997. An Analysis of the Relationships Between Test-Takers' Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategy Use and Second Language Test Performance. Language Learning. 47, 289–325.

[53] Al-Seghayer, K., 2022. Determinants of Saudi EFL Learners' Beliefs about Learning EFL. Studies in English Language Teaching. 10(3), 1–13.

[54] Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., 1997. Understanding Learning and Teaching: The experience in higher education. Educational Psychologist. 27(1), 13–24.

[55] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Massachusetts, UK. pp. 1–174.

Downloads

How to Cite

Al Fraidan, A. A. (2025). The Enhanced Adaptive PPP Model: A Novel Framework for Revolutionizing Test-Taking Strategies in Language Assessment. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(1), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7918

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 1 (January 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Abdullah A. Al Fraidan

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.