Visual Metaphors and Discursive Strategies in AI Editorial Cartoons: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach

Authors

  • Shaimaa Mohamed Helal

    English Department, Faculty of Arts, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8124
Received: 18 December 2025 | Revised: 11 February 2025 | Accepted: 14 February 2025 | Published Online: 27 February 2025

Abstract

Metaphors significantly shape our understanding of societal issues, influencing how we perceive and react to them. With AI technology becoming increasingly prevalent, it has become a popular subject for cartoonists who use their art to convey diverse opinions about its impact. This study examines how AI is portrayed in editorial cartoons, focusing on visual metaphors, inferred metaphors (i.e., metaphors inferred from the image and/or text), and discursive practices cartoonists employ to communicate their messages. Applying Lakoff and Johnson’s metaphor model, the study finds that AI is often depicted with a skeptical or cautionary tone, emphasizing its potential effects on human cognition and creativity. The study identified a variety of visual metaphors in which AI technology is represented as a reflective entity confronted with existential inquiries, a reflective thinker, a liberator/controller of human cognition, an explorer within the labyrinth of human knowledge, the next stage in evolutionary progress, a naïve mind confronted by the weight of human wisdom, an explorer of novel frontiers, akin to the romantic figures of the historical past, and an agent of destruction concerning human knowledge. Cartoonists use discursive strategies such as anthropomorphism, metaphorical representation, intertextuality, symbolism, irony, and humor to express their perspectives and ideological viewpoints on AI technology. The findings highlight the need for ongoing ethical and philosophical reflection as AI becomes more integrated into daily life.

Keywords:

Visual Metaphor; Artificial Intelligence; Discursive Strategies; Editorial Cartoons; Cognitive Approach

References

[1] Gibbs, R.W., 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. (ix + 527).

[2] Lakoff, G., 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 202–251.

[3] Lakoff, G., 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In: A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 202–251.

[4] Lakoff, G., 2008. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USA. pp. (ix+634).

[5] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 2008. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, US. pp. (ix + 243).

[6] Refaie, E.E., 2003. Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication. 2(1), 75-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001755

[7] Sweetser, E., 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. (xi+174).

[8] Turner, M., 1998. Figure. In: Katz, A.N., Cacciari, C., Gibbs, R.W., et al. (eds.). Figurative Language and Thought. Oxford University Press: New York, US. pp. 44–87.

[9] Sani, I., 2014. The use of verbal and visual metaphors in the construction of satire in Nigerian political cartoons. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies. 4(2), 147-169.

[10] Ghazvineh, A., 2024. An inter-semiotic analysis of ideational meaning in text-prompted AI-generated images. Language and Semiotic Studies. 10(1), 17-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2023-0030

[11] Helal, S. M., 2025. To Bit or Not to Bit? Unveiling the Visual Discourse of AI: Exploring Cartoons in the Age of Artificial Intelligence . Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.7398

[12] Forceville, C., 2002. The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics. 34(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00007-8.

[13] Garello, S., 2024. Metaphor as a “Matter of Thought”: Conceptual metaphor theory. In: Garello, S. (ed.). The Enigma of Metaphor: Philosophy, Pragmatics, Cognitive Science. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 65-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56866-4_3

[14] Gibbs, R.J., Ortony, A., 2008. Metaphor and thought. In: Gibbs, R.J. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. pp. 3-13.

[15] Vereza, S.C., Dienstbach, D., 2021. A wave of metaphors: Image and visual metaphors in cartoons from a cognitive-discursive perspective. Revista da ABRALIN. 20(7), 874-899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25189/rabralin.v20i3.2005

[16] Gibbs, R.W., 2017. Metaphor Wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. (ii+320) . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107762350

[17] Cherkas, N., 2024. The concept of cognitive metaphor. VII International Scientific and Practical Conference; August 16, 2024; Oxford, UK, pp. 202–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-16.08.2024.040

[18] Dudok, R., 2022. The cognitive essence of the metaphor. Теорія і практика викладання української мови як іноземної [Theory and Practice of Teaching Ukrainian as a Foreign Language]. 16, 167–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30970/ufl.2022.16.3732

[19] Fan, Y., 2023. Poetic metaphors and embodied cognition — A potential pathway of mind development. Communications in Humanities Research. 20, 238–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/20/20231378.

[20] Huang, J., 2021. Perception Metaphors in Cognition, Language, and Communication: Perception Metaphors, by Laura J. Speed, Carolyn O'Meara, Lila San Roque and Asifa Majid. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2019, 382 pp., $143.00 (hardback), ISBN 978-90-272-0200-0. The Senses and Society. 16(3), 356-359.

[21] Jin, Z., 2024. Approaches to metaphor: Cognitive-linguistic and philosophical perspectives. Communications in Humanities Research. 30, 133-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/30/20231666

[22] Johnson, D., Glenn, H., 2022. Using metaphors: An effective and person-centered approach to grief and substance abuse counseling. In: Furr, S.R., ‎Hunsucker, K. (eds.). Grief Work in Addictions Counseling. Routledge: New York, NY, US. pp. 286-290.

[23] Khkalay, A., Turabi, T.A.M., 2019. Metaphor: A device of cognition. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 9(9), p93108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.9.09.2019.P93108

[24] Lilja, J., Ingelsson, P., Snyder, K., et al., 2020. Metaphors we manage and develop quality by. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. 12(4), 405-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2019-0060

[25] Singh, M., Øvsthus, K., Kampen, A.L., et al., 2024. Development of a human cognition inspired condition management system for equipment. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02391-y

[26] Zhgun, D., 2024. 2. Metaphor as an attempt to “look into” the essence of things. Language: The Multidisciplinarity of Scientific Knowledge. 7, 17-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37386/2949-3307-2024-7-2

[27] Żuromski, D., Pacholik-Żuromska, A., 2024. Socio-cultural brain reprogramming–The uniqueness of human cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 18, 1331213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.133121

[28] Clark, K.M., 2024. Embodied imagination: Lakoff and Johnson's experientialist view of conceptual understanding. Review of General Psychology. 28(2), 166–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680231224400

[29] Tong, X., Shutova, E., Lewis, M., 2021. Recent advances in neural metaphor processing: A linguistic, cognitive, and social perspective. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies; June 6–11, 2021; online. pp. 4673-4686.

[30] Yang, M., 2023. An analysis of metaphors in daily life. International Journal of Education and Humanities. 7(1), 34-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v7i1.4864

[31] Huizi, P., 2024. The cultural origins of human cognition. Gogoa. 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1387/gogoa.26091

[32] Ritchie, L.D., 2006. Conceptual metaphor theory. In: Ritchie, L.D. (ed.). Context and Connection in Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 31-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286825_3

[33] Forceville, C., 2015. Visual and multimodal metaphor in film: charting the field. In: Fahlenbrach, K. (ed.), Embodied Metaphors in Film, Television, and Video Games. Routledge: New York, NY, US. pp. 17–32.

[34] Kövecses, Z., 2016. Conceptual metaphor theory. In: Semino, E., ‎ Demjén, Z. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language. Routledge: New York, NY, US. pp. 31-45.

[35] Forceville, C., 2008. Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In: Kaal, E., Krennmayr, T., Kaal, A. (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 462–482.

[36] Yus, F., 2009. Visual metaphor versus verbal metaphor: A unified account. In: Forceville, C.J., Urios-Aparisi, E. (eds.). Multimodal Metaphor. De Gruyter Mouton: Beilin, Germany. pp. 147-172.

[37] Carroll, N., 1996. A note on film metaphor. Journal of Pragmatics. 26(6), 809–822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00021-5

[38] El Refaie, E., 2009. Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In: Forceville, C., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T. (eds.). Multimodal Metaphor. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 173–196.

[39] Alousque, I.N., 2013. Visual metaphor and metonymy in French political cartoons. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. 26, 365–384.

[40] Forceville, C., 1996. Pictorial metaphor in advertising. Routledge: London, UK. pp. (x+233).

[41] Phillips, B.J., McQuarrie, E.F., 2004. Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory. 4(1-2), 113-136.

[42] Forceville, C., 2011. Pictorial runes in Tintin and the Picaros. Journal of Pragmatics. 43(3), 875–890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.014.

[43] Forceville, C., Jeulink, M., 2011. The flesh and blood of embodied understanding: The source-path-goal schema in animation film. Pragmatics & Cognition. 19(1), 37–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.02for.

[44] Ciorba-Lașcu, T., 2023. Valorificarea textului literar în contextul strategiilor discursive de studiere a limbii engleze. Exploitation of the literary text in the context of discursive strategies in the English classroom. Science and Education: New Approaches and Perspectives. 3, 209–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46727/c.v3.24-25-03-2023.p209-213

[45] Eom, D., Newman, T., Brossard, D., et al., 2024. Societal guardrails for AI? Perspectives on what we know about public opinion on artificial intelligence. Science and Public Policy. 51(5), 1004–1013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae041

[46] Kanzola, A.M., Papaioannou, K., Petrakis, P., 2024. Unlocking society's standings in artificial intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 200, 123106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123106

[47] Moravec, V., Hynek, N., Gavurova, B., et al., 2024. Everyday artificial intelligence unveiled: Societal awareness of technological transformation. Oeconomia Copernicana. 15(2), 367-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2961

[48] Seth, J., 2024. Public perception of AI: sentiment and opportunity. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2407.15998. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.15998 (cited Mon, 22 Jul 2024).

[49] Wen, C.H.R., Chen, Y.N.K., 2024. Understanding public perceptions of revolutionary technology: The role of political ideology, knowledge, and news consumption. Journal of Science Communication. 23(5), A07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23050207

[50] Kubrick, S. 1968. 2001: A Space Odyssey. A film.

[51] Helal, S., 2024. A multimodal discourse analysis of selected caricature images associated with artificial intelligence technology. CALR Linguistic Journal. 1(15), 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/XOPL6668

Downloads

How to Cite

Helal, S. M. (2025). Visual Metaphors and Discursive Strategies in AI Editorial Cartoons: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(3), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8124

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 3 (March 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Shaimaa Mohamed Helal

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.