-
3144
-
2212
-
1470
-
1184
-
986
Understanding Syntactic Deviations of Sentence Derivation in Student English: A Study within the Minimalist Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.8199Abstract
This study explores the syntactic deviations in written English by freshmen EFL students at Saudi universities focusing on their implications for understanding syntactic competence. The research investigates 105 students' compositions to pinpoint the most frequent and notable syntactic errors, employing the Minimalist Program (MP) by Noam Chomsky. The objective is to root these deviations within a solid theoretical background, thereby scientifically elucidating their causes and enhancing strategies for explaining syntax using the latest Chomskyan MP approach. The findings reveal that the most common syntactic deviations include verb complement errors (22.43%), tense and agreement discrepancies, (21.14%) and omissions of critical syntactic elements like prepositions (9.28%) and determiners (3.42%). These errors are systematically categorized and analyzed using MP mechanisms, which facilitates a deeper understanding of the theoretical bases upon which syntactic structures are formed and analyzed. This methodological approach helps in understanding the origins of observed errors, providing a well-grounded justification for deeming certain expressions incorrect in daily language practices. Ultimately, this analysis not only illuminates the common challenges faced by these learners but also suggests more effective teaching strategies. By leveraging a profound and clear understanding of MP, the study provides insights into the practical and deep reasons behind linguistic errors, enhancing both theoretical knowledge and instructional practices in the field of EFL.
Keywords:
Agree; Feature Checking; Merge; Move Syntactic Deviations; Sentence Derivation; SelectReferences
[1] Ellis, R., 2008. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
[2] Hinkel, E., 2004. Tense, aspect, and the passive voice in L2 academic texts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 26(1), 87–112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104261044
[3] Corder, S.P., 1967. The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 5(1–4), 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
[4] Al-Khulaidi, M.A., Abdulkhalek, M.M., 2022. Academic writing problems in L2 settings: Realities and need for intervention. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix. 1(1), 42–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v1i1.15
[5] Almahameed, Y.S., Al-Shaikhli, M., 2017. Understanding syntactic and semantic errors in the composition writing of Jordanian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 6(6), 158–164.
[6] Ayadi, M., 2023. Lexical richness and syntactic complexity as predictors of academic writing performance. Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix. 2(1), 23–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i1.43
[7] Arista, C., Subandi., 2020. Analysis of language errors at the level of syntax in writing free discourse text. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. 201, 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.121
[8] Udoka, D.S.T., 2022. A syntactic investigation of the variant and deviant Nigerian English in written essays of Ritman University. Approaches in International Journal of Research Development. 13(1), 334–346.
[9] Granger, S., 1998. Learner English on computer. Addison Wesley Longman: Boston, MA, USA.
[10] Nesselhauf, N., 2004. Learner corpora and their potential for language teaching. Language Teaching. 37(3), 223–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002521
[11] Lado, R., 1957. Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
[12] Lawal, M.O., 2013. Nigerian English syntax and usage: Between deviance and deviation. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 3(14). Available from: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/7930
[13] Opara, C.G., 2019. Deviations in popular Nigerian English syntax. The Directorate of General Studies at the Federal University of Technology Owerri: Owerri, Nigeria.
[14] Chomsky, N., 1995a. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 167–217.
[15] Nuruzzaman, M., Islam, A.B.M.S., Shuchi, I.J., 2018. An analysis of errors committed by Saudi non-English major students in the English paragraph writing: A study of comparisons. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 9(1), 31–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.31
[16] Alqhtani, M.F., 2018. Investigating syntactic errors among Saudi EFL learners. Arab World English Journal. May.
[17] Selinker, L., 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 10(3), 209–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
[18] James, C., 1998. Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge: London, UK.
[19] Swan, M., Smith, B., 2001. Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[20] Brown, S., 1999. The syntax of negation in Russian: A minimalist approach. CSLI Publications: Stanford, CA, USA.
[21] Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., Grohmann, K., 2005. Understanding Minimalism. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[22] Zeijlstra, H., 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord [Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Amsterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[23] Al-Horais, N., 2012. On the universality of auxiliary verbs. Journal of Universal Language. 13(1), 7–30.
[24] Radford, A., 2004. Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[25] Kremers, J., 2003. The noun phrase in Arabic: A minimalist approach [Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Nijmegen: Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
[26] Chomsky, N., 2001. Derivation by Phase. In: Kenstowicz, M. (Ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 1–52.
[27] Chomsky, N., 1995b. Categories and transformations. In: The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 219–394.
[28] Boeckx, C., Grohmann, K., 2004. Putting Phases into Perspective. Available from: http://www.punksinscience.org/kleanthes/papers/bg_ppp.pdf (cited 10 December 2006).
[29] Culicover, P., 1997. Principles and parameters theory: An introduction to syntactic theory. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.
[30] Köroğlu, Z.Ç., 2014. An analysis on grammatical errors of Turkish EFL students’ written texts. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish. 9(12), 101–111.
[31] Garshol, L., 2019. I just doesn’t know: Agreement errors in English texts by Norwegian L2 learners: Causes and remedies [Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]. University of Agder: Agder , Norway.
[32] Ngangbam, H., 2016. An analysis of syntactic errors committed by students of English language class in the written composition of Mutah University: A case study. Journal of Error Analysis. 3(1). Available from: https://www.idpublications.org
[33] Santoso, A., Iriyansah, M.R., 2020. Syntactical error analysis on conjunctional students' English narrative composition. Deiksis. 12(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/deiksis.v12i03.6429
[34] Hafiz, M.S., Omar, A.M.A., Sher, K.U., 2018. Analysis of syntactic errors in English writing: A case study of Jazan University Preparatory Year students. Journal of Education and Practice. 9(11). Available from: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/42190
[35] Talosa, A.D., Maguddayao, R.N., 2018. Evaluation of second language learners' syntactic errors in ESL writing. TESOL International Journal. 13(4), 172–181.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Aeshah Almineeai
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.