“The Class Is Full of Competitive Spirit:” A Qualitative Study of First-Year Saudi EFL Female Students’ Perceptions of Task-Based Learning

Authors

  • Hajar Al Sultan

    Department of English Language, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al-Hofuf , Saudi Arabia
  • Nouf Abdulrahman Alkhaldi

    Department of English Language, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al-Hofuf , Saudi Arabia
  • Hoor Abdulrahman Alsubaie

    Department of English Language, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al-Hofuf , Saudi Arabia
  • Fatimah Ahmed Alkhamis

    Department of English Language, College of Arts, King Faisal University, Al-Hofuf , Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8445
Received: 10 December 2024 | Revised: 25 January 2025 | Accepted: 27 January 2025 | Published Online: 26 February 2025

Abstract

With the shift toward learner-centered language teaching, studies within the Saudi educational system have explored Saudi EFL students’ motivation, experiences, and perceptions as key factors influencing engagement and achievement. However, limited research has investigated how task-based learning (TBL) is perceived and implemented in culturally specific contexts, particularly among female EFL university students. This study addresses this gap through a qualitative design grounded in Vygotskian sociocultural theory, examining first-year Saudi EFL female students’ perceptions of TBL and the factors influencing their engagement. Drawing on classroom observations and 10 in-depth semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis revealed key themes related to attitudes, task implementation, individual and group work dynamics, and factors influencing task engagement. A central finding was the duality in students’ perceptions, balancing enjoyment and engagement with emotional and cognitive challenges. While initial attitudes were mostly positive, a gradual shift in perceptions reflected growing self-efficacy. This duality, combined with the gradual shift in perceptions, underscores the interplay between supportive learning environments, language skills, self-efficacy, and task-related challenges. Students emphasized the importance of tasks promoting cognitive growth, supported by scaffolding, reflection, and collaboration. This study also highlighted the role of self-directed learning and growth mindset in managing emotions and building confidence. Recommendations include designing tasks with balanced complexity, effective scaffolding, and further research into students’ self-regulation, reflections, and task engagement. By addressing sociocultural and psychological factors, this research contributes nuanced insights into task engagement and TBL dynamics in Saudi higher education, advancing the understanding of language acquisition in culturally specific contexts.

Keywords:

Task-Based Learning; Task Engagement; Perceptions; Self-Efficacy; Scaffolding

References

[1] Carrero Pérez, N.P., 2016. Effects of tasks on spoken interaction and motivation in English language learners. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal. 13, 34–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.311

[2] Ellis, R., 2003. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 1–400.

[3] McCaslin, M., Daniel, T.H., 2013. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In: Zimmerman, B.J., Schunk, D.H. (eds.). Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 213–238.

[4] Alharbi, S., Alshahrani, A., 2023. Impact of task-based learning on student motivation and performance in ESL contexts. Language Teaching Research. 27(5), 567–580.

[5] Al-Tamimi, N.O., Abdullah, N., Bin-Hady, W.R.A., 2020. Teaching speaking skills to EFL college students through task-based approach: problems and improvement. British Journal of English Linguistics. 8(2), 113–130.

[6] Hadi, A., 2013. Perceptions of task-based language teaching: A study of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching. 6(1), 103–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p103

[7] Liu, Y., Mishan, F., Chambers, A., 2018. Investigating EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in higher education in China. The Language Learning Journal. 49(2), 131–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1465110

[8] Nunan, D., 2004. Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. i-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336

[9] Willis, J., 1996. A Framework for Task-based Learning. Longman: Harlow, UK. pp. vi-183.

[10] Alwahibee, K.M., Al-Mutairi, A.S., 2024. Exploring EFL teachers’ views on task-based learning and English for specific purposes in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 15(4), 168–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no4.11

[11] Nunan, D., 1991. Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly. 25(2), 279–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3587464

[12] Nunan, D., 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. ix-208.

[13] Bhandari, L.P., 2020. Task-based language teaching: A current EFL approach. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 11(1), 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.1p.1

[14] Breen, M., 1987. Learner contributions to task design. In: Candlin, C., Murphy, D. (eds.). Language Learning Tasks. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA. pp. 23–46.

[15] Al-Zahrani, N.O.A., Rajab, H., 2017. Attitudes and perceptions of Saudi EFL teachers in implementing Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030. International Journal of English Language Education. 5(1), 83–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v5i1.10733

[16] Alghonaim, A., 2014. Saudi university students’ perceptions and attitudes towards communicative and non-communicative activities and their relationship to foreign language anxiety. Research Journal of English Language and Literature. 2(2), 83–101.

[17] Jamal, M., Anas, A., Ahmad Koka, N., 2020. Perception of Saudi EFL learners and teachers towards the use of listening transcript in the listening lessons. Arab World English Journal. 11(1), 297–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.22

[18] Alfares, N., 2017. Benefits and difficulties of learning in group work in EFL classes in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching. 10(7), 247–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p247

[19] Elashhab, S., 2020. A study on Arabic speaking students’ attitudes towards group work in the EFL classroom. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(4), 303–312. Available from: https://www.asian-esp-journal.com/volume-16-issue-4-july-2020/

[20] Abdulkader, F.A., 2019. Exploring Saudi EFL teachers' and learners’ perceptions regarding the application of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the English language classroom. [Unpublished PhD thesis].University of Northumbria: Newcastle, UK.

[21] Alluhaydan, H.M., 2024. The perceptions and attitudes of Saudi EFL students toward the use of communicative language teaching in oral communication classes. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research. 12(1), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37745/ijellr.13/vol12n1123

[22] Mudinillah, A., Rahmi, S.N., Taro, N., 2024. Task-based language teaching: A systematic review of research and applications. Lingeduca: Journal of Language and Education Studies. 3 s. 102–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70177/lingeduca.v3i2.1352

[23] Chen, S., Wang, J., 2019. Effects of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) approach and language assessment on students’ competences in intensive reading course. English Language Teaching. 12(3), 119–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n3p119

[24] Ilin, G., Inozu, J., Yumru, H., 2007. Teachers' and learners' perceptions of tasks: objectives and outcomes. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education. 3(1), 60–68.

[25] Sholeh, M.B., Salija, K., Sahril, 2021.Indonesian EFL learners’ attitude and perception on task-based language teaching. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature. 45(3), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2021.45.3.109-127

[26] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 79–91.

[27] Shabani, K., Khatib, M., Ebadi, S., 2010. Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching. 3(4), 237–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237

[28] Roosevelt F.D., 2008. Zone of proximal development. In: Salkind, N.J. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Educational Psychology. SAGE Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA, United States. pp. 1017–1022.

[29] Bogdan, R., Biklen, S.K., 1997. Qualitative Research for Education, vol. 368. Allyn & Bacon: Boston, MA, United States. pp. 1–304.

[30] Ciesielska, M., Boström, K.W., Öhlander, M., 2018. Observation methods. In: Ciesielska, M., Jemielniak, D. (eds) Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. pp. 33–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2

[31] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[32] Hernández-Chérrez, E., Hidalgo-Camacho, C., Escobar-Llanganate, P., 2021. Communication games: Their contribution to developing speaking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 643–658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14437a

[33] Bandura, A., 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company: New York, United States. pp. 1–604.

[34] Alghanmi, B.F., 2023. Self-assessment in EFL Speaking Classroom and Its Effect on Achievement, Self-regulated Learning, and Critical Thinking: Students’ Voices from Saudi Arabia [Doctoral Dissertation]. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. pp. ii-253. Available from: https://theses.gla.ac.uk/83697

[35] Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., Miller, M., 2011. Self-Regulated, co-Regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In: Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B. (eds.). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Taylor & Francis. 65–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch5

[36] Bruner, J.S., 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, United States. pp. xi-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029019

[37] Newman, R., 2017. Let's talk talk: utilizing metatalk for the development of productive collaborative dialogues. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 26, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.006

[38] Kumaravadivelu, B., 2006. Learner perception of learning tasks. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 152(1), 127–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/itl.152.0.2017866

[39] Zimmerman, B.J., 2000. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeidner, M. (eds.). Handbook of Self-regulation. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA. pp. 13–39.

[40] Ku, K.Y.L., Ho, I.T., 2010. Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning. 5(3), 251–267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6

[41] Pintrich, P.R., 1999. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research. 31(6), 459-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00015-4

[42] Zare, J., Delavar, K.A., Derakhshan, A., et al., 2024. The relationship between self‐regulated learning strategy use and task engagement. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 842–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12535

[43] Dweck, C.S., 2006. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House: New York, NY, USA. pp. x-276.

[44] Swain, M., 1997. Collaborative dialogue: its contribution to second language learning. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 34, 115–132.

[45] Situmorang, M.A., 2021. Students’ perception of using group work in English class. JET (Journal of English Teaching. 7(1), 81–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v7i1.2302

[46] Donato, R., 1994. Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: Lantolf, J.P., Appel, G. (eds.). Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research. Ablex Publishing Corporation: Norwood, NJ, USA. pp. 33–56.

[47] Raslan, G., 2024. The impact of the Zone of Proximal Development concept (scaffolding) on the students problem solving skills and learning outcomes. In: Al Marri, K., Mir, F.A., David, S.A., et al. (eds.). BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2023 Multidisciplinary Studies. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 59–66.

[48] Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J., 2003. Cognitive Load Theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3801_1

[49] Long, M.H., 2014. Second Language Acquisition and Task-based Language Teaching. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, USA. pp. xi-436.

[50] Meng, Y., Cheng, B., 2010. College students’ perceptions on the issues of task-based language teaching in Mainland China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 1(4), 434–442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.4.434-442

[51] Hidi, S., Berndorff, D., Ainley, M., 2002.Children’s argument writing, interest and self-efficacy: An intervention study. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00009-3

[52] Zuckerman, G.A., 1994. A pilot study of a ten-day course in cooperative learning for beginning Russian first graders. The Elementary School Journal. 94(4), 405–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/4617

[53] Ismail, S.A.A., Al Allaq, K., 2019. The nature of cooperative learning and differentiated instruction practices in English classes. Sage Open. 9(2), 2158244019856450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856450

[54] Sapan, M., Mede, E., 2022. The effects of differentiated instruction (DI) on achievement, motivation, and autonomy among English learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. 10(1), 127–144.

[55] Labordo Jr, D.C., 2024. Assessing the Influence of differentiated instruction on enhancing reading comprehension skills among learners: A quasi-experimental study. The New English Teacher ISSN 2985-0959 (Online). 18(2), 13–28.

Downloads

How to Cite

Al Sultan, H., Alkhaldi, N. A., Alsubaie, H. A., & Alkhamis, F. A. (2025). “The Class Is Full of Competitive Spirit:” A Qualitative Study of First-Year Saudi EFL Female Students’ Perceptions of Task-Based Learning. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8445

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 2 (February 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Hajar Al Sultan, Nouf Abdulrahman Alkhaldi, Hoor Abdulrahman Alsubaie, Fatimah Ahmed Alkhamis

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.