-
5785
-
5424
-
2162
-
2055
-
1703
Geosymbolism of Colors in Kazakh and Turkish Toponyms: A Comparative Linguistic and Cultural Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8483Abstract
This study analyzes the geosymbolism of color terms in Kazakh and Turkish toponyms. Colors, as universal cultural
elements, play a significant role in shaping spatial perception and the mental map of the world. They not only describe the
physical characteristics of landscapes but also convey symbolic meanings that reflect the cultural and worldview-specific
features of different peoples. The study reveals that in both Kazakh and Turkish traditions, color elements in place names
serve a dual function: they describe physical landscape features and carry symbolic meanings rooted in mythology and
historical perceptions. For instance, black is commonly linked to the north, white to the west, red to the south, and blue to
the east. These color-based names not only act as geographical markers but also reflect sacred and ethnocultural concepts.
The findings highlight both shared patterns and distinctive differences in how color symbolism is applied by Kazakhs
and Turks. Understanding these linguistic representations deepens our knowledge of how natural and cultural spaces are
perceived through language. Additionally, the study sheds light on the broader connection between language and mental
geography, offering new perspectives for further research in Turkology, linguistics, and cultural studies.
Keywords:
Toponymy; Geosymbolism; Color Symbolism; Kazakh language; Turkish LanguageReferences
[1] Khassenov, B.R., Adilova, A.S., 2012. On the Origin of Color Terms. Bulletin of Karaganda University. Philology Series. 4(68), 5–10.
[2] Malov, S.E., 1952. Ancient Turkic Texts. Academy of Sciences of the USSR: Moscow, Russia. pp. 30–90.
[3] Garkavets, A.N., 2006. Lexicographical Studies of Turkic Languages. Daik-Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan. pp. 55–180.
[4] Kashgari, M., 2010. Divan-u Lugat at-Turk (E.S. Atalay, Trans.). Turkish Historical Society: Istanbul, Turkey. (Original work published 1072–1074).
[5] Kaidarov, A., Akhtamberdiyeva, Z., Ömirbekov, B., 1992. Reflection of Colors in the Language. Ana Tili: Almaty, Kazakhstan. p. 160.
[6] Serikbayeva, Ü., 2003. Ethnolinguistic Characteristics of “White" and "Black" Color Terms in Kazakh [PhD Dissertation Abstract]. Almaty. p. 28.
[7] Aitova, N., 2003. Cognitive Structure of Color Terms' Semantics [PhD Dissertation Abstract]. Almaty. p. 29.
[8] Laulanbekova, R., 2010. Cognitive Features of Complex Color Component Nominations (Adjective + Noun Model) [PhD Dissertation Abstract]. Almaty. p. 29.
[9] Kononov, A.N., 1976. Semantics of Color Terms in Turkic Languages. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. p. 547.
[10] Akhmetzhanova, F.R., Kaiyrbayeva, K.T., 1998. Color Terms in Fixed Expressions. Publishing House of VKTU: Ust-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan. p. 173.
[11] Lotman, Y.M., Uspensky, B. A., Mihaychuk, G., 2017. On the semiotic mechanism of culture. New literary history. 211–232.
[12] Barbier, J.C., 2013. A Conceptual Approach of the Destandardization of Employment in Europe since the 1970s. In: Koch, M., Fritz, M. (eds.). Non-Standard Employment in Europe: paradigms, prevalence and policy responses. Palgrave Macmillan UK: London, UK. pp. 13–28.
[13] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 2008. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
[14] Klyashtorny, S.G., 2001. Concepts of Time and Space in Ancient Turkic Monuments. Ancient Turkic Civilization: Monuments of Writing. Gylym: Almaty, Kazakhstan. pp. 33–44.
[15] Podosinov, A.V., 1999. Ex Oriente Lux! Orientation by Cardinal Directions in Archaic Cultures of Eurasia. Languages of Slavic Culture: Moscow, Russia. p. 720.
[16] Lévy-Bruhl, L., 1930. Primitive Thinking. Atheist: Moscow, Russia. 365.
[17] Kononov, A.N., 1978. Methods and Terms for Defining Cardinal Directions in Turkic Peoples. Turkological Collection. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. pp. 72–91.
[18] Khassenov, B. R., 2024. Mythical and Linguistic Interpretation of the 12+1 Model. Bulletin of Karaganda University. Philology Series. 11329(1), 6–15.
[19] Özkan, S. H., 2012. Study of Alanya Toponyms Based on 16th-Century Records. International Journal of Social Sciences. 6(3).
[20] Ögel, B., 1991. Introduction to the History of Turkish Culture. Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Turkey: Ankara, Turkey. p. 6.
[21] Von Gabain, A., 1962. On the Meaning of Symbolic Colors. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 15, 111–117.
[22] Pritsak, O., 1954. Orientation and Color Symbolism. Seculum. 5, 376–383.
[23] Baskakov, N. A., 1980. Models of Turkic Ethnonyms and Their Typological Classification. Onomastics of the East: Collection of Articles. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. pp. 199–207.
[24] Lvova, E. L., Oktyabrskaya, I. V., Sagalaev, A. M., et al., 1988. Traditional Worldview of the Turks of Southern Siberia: Space, Time, and Material World. Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia. 225.
[25] Etymological Dictionary of Turkic Languages: Common Turkic and Inter-Turkic Bases on the Letter “Қ”, 2000. In: Blagova, G.F. (ed.). Languages of Russian Culture: Moscow, Russia. 261.
[26] Gabithanuly, K., Gabit, E., 2019. "Tengri mountain" (or Tien Shan) is a name inherited from the Huns. Electronic scientific journal "edu. e-history.kz". 6(1), 79–82.
[27] Zhanuzak, T., 2015. Where does the name "Kazakh" come from? Journal of the Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynov "Tiltanym". 3, 27–33.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Nazgul Abdrakhynova, Gulmira Madiyeva, Güzel Hasan

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.