-
4782
-
4590
-
1839
-
1675
-
1385
Cognitive and Pragmatic Potential of the Language of Political Leaders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8518Abstract
The article focuses on linguistic reference as a crucial process for meaning creation in political discourse. From the perspective of its function in establishing associative connections, influencing the audience's perception, and shaping political reality, linguistic reference is examined. The study covers both a practical examination of the use of references in political documents and speeches and a theoretical investigation of the concepts and forms of references. The roles of reference in influencing public opinion, establishing the speaker's authority, and creating pictures that appeal to the historical and cultural context are all given special consideration. As a methodological foundation, content and discourse analyses enable us to spot trends in reference usage based on the political context and the intended audience. Additionally, the study investigates how explicit and implicit references contribute to the ideological framing of political discourse, reinforcing or challenging dominant narratives. The strategic selection of references can serve as a tool for persuasion, manipulation, or legitimization of certain viewpoints. By analyzing key speeches and documents from various political actors, the research demonstrates how references to history, literature, or shared cultural symbols enhance the persuasive impact of discourse. The findings emphasize the necessity of a critical approach to reference analysis in political communication. This study provides valuable insights for scholars and practitioners in linguistics, political science, rhetoric, and media studies.
Keywords:
Sociolinguistic Analysis; Linguistic Analysis; Benjamin Franklin; Kekilbayuly; Writer’s Personality; Political DiscourseReferences
[1] Perelgut, N. M., Sukhotskaya, E. B., 2013. On the structure of the concept of "political discourse". Bulletin of Nizhnevartovsk State University. 2, 35-41.
[2] Kryuchkova, N. V., 2009. The role of reference and communication in concept formation and concept research (based on Russian, English, French languages) [Doctoral dissertation]. Saratov, Russia: Saratov State University.
[3] Melnik, O. G., 2019. The role of deixis in modelling rhetorical space (based on H. Clinton's speech).
[4] Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., Speed, E., 2009. Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods. 2009.
[5] Kranert, M., 2017. ‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way. Discourse & Society. 28(2), 182-203. DOl: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516685463
[6] Hawley, M. C., 2022. Light or Fire? Frederick Douglass and the Orator's Dilemma. American Journal of Political Science. 68(22), 631–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12737
[7] Parry-Giles, S. J., Samek, A. A. 2014. Rhetoric and Politics. In: W. Donsbach (ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Communication. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecr068.pub2
[8] Klyuev, Y. V., 2016. Political Discourse in Mass Communication: Analysis of Public Political Interaction. Directmedia: Moscow.
[9] Ruzhentseva, N. B., Ivanova, E. N., Nakhimova, E. A., Nikiforova, M.V., 2021. Linguopolitical Personology: Methodology and Communicative Portraits of Political Leaders. - Ural State Pedagogical University: Ekaterinburg, Russia.
[10] Sclafani, J., 2017. Talking Donald Trump: A sociolinguistic study of style, metadiscourse, and political identity, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. DOl: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315276885
[11] Voda. R., 2009. Language and politics.
[12] Kekilbaiuly, A., 1998. White Dawn of Freedom (speech from the Department of Time). Almaty, Kazakhstan.
[13] Caldwell, J., 2024. U.S. Constitution.net. Speech of Benjamin Franklin — The US Constitution online — USConstitution.net. Available from: https://www.usconstitution.net/franklin-html/ (cited 23 April 2024).
[14] Salzhanova L.E., Baktiyarova R.M., Mamyrkhanova Zh.T., 2023. Cognitive-psychological approach to discursive analysis. Tiltanym. (3), 153-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2023-3-153-162
[15] Soltanbekova A.A., Zholshaeva M.S., Satkenova J.B., Ramazanov R.B., 2023. Semantic features of political vocabulary in the kazakh language. Tiltanym. (3), 192-199. (In Kazakh) DOI: https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2023-3-192-199
[16] Kordabay B.K., 2021. Pragmatics of using conversational style in the discourse of a diplomat. Tiltanym. (4), 26-36. (In Kazakh) DOI: https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2021-4-25-35
[17] Amanbaeva A.Zh., 2020. Political discourse: prosodic features and pragmatic activities. Tiltanym. (1), 36-42. (In Kazakh)
[18] Kabylov, A., Anes, G., Kamarova, N., et al., 2024. Cultural Identity of Public Consciousness in Kazakhstan Literature Education: Effects of a New Teaching Method. Journalof Ethnicand Cultural Studies. 11(1), 119-141. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1954
[19] Kamarova N., Zhailauov B., 2024. Abish Kekilbayev – literary critic. Bulletin of the Eurasian Humanitarian Institute. (1), 157-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55808/1999-4214.2024-1.12
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Aidana Makhambetova, Almagul Khabiyeva, Nursaule Rsaliyeva, Zhanargul Yermekova, Farida Kozhakhmetova, Saule Magzhan

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.