The Impact of Online Learning on the Pragmatic Competence of Refusal Speech Acts: Perspectives of Jordanian Instructors

Authors

  • Ahmad Al Mseideen

    Faculty of Languages and Communication, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Gong Badak, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu Darul Iman 21300, Malaysia

  • Kamariah Binti Yunus

    Faculty of Languages and Communication, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Gong Badak, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu Darul Iman 21300, Malaysia

  • Zakaryia Almahasees

    Department of English Language and Translation, Applied Science Private University, Al Arab Street 21, Amman 11937, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8632
Received: 3 February 2025 | Revised: 13 March 2025 | Accepted: 17 March 2025 | Published Online: 19 March 2025

Abstract

This paper aims to define the pragmatic practice and proficiency of refusal speech acts among English as a Foreign Language undergraduate students who completed online-based learning at the World Islamic Sciences & Education University (WISE) in Jordan. It also explores whether their pragmatic proficiency was affected by the transition from face-to-face to online instruction, as perceived by their instructors. The present study employed a quantitative approach using a questionnaire as the primary data collection instrument. Data were collected from ten WISE lecturers and statistically analyzed to quantify students’ pragmatic knowledge of refusal speech acts, including familiarity, power, directness, and politeness. The findings indicated that the students’ pragmatic competence to produce and comprehend refusal speech acts was low across online classes, as observed by their lecturers. Moreover, the findings indicated that teachers presupposed the move to online education negatively affected students’ pragmatic competence, making it more difficult for them to use and comprehend refusals appropriately. These findings highlight the need for higher education policymakers to consider the sensitivity of speech act instruction in online settings when creating and designing courses. Additionally, the study highlights the need for integrating pragmatic competence development into online courses to enhance students’ communication skills in virtual learning environments.

Keywords:

Refusal; Speech Act; Pragmatic Competence; Online-Based Classes

References

[1] Almomani, E.Y., Qablan, A.M., Atrooz, F.Y., et al., 2021. The Influence of Coronavirus Diseases 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and the Quarantine Practices on University Students' Beliefs About the Online Learning Experience in Jordan. Frontiers in Public Health. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.595874

[2] Derakhshan, A., Arabmofrad, A., 2018. The Impact of Instruction on the Pragmatic Comprehension of Speech Acts of Apology, Request, and Refusal Among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. English Teaching & Learning. 42, 75–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-018-0004-6

[3] Renaldo, Z.A., 2021. Emotions and Illocutionary Acts Used by Polytechnic Students in Describing Online Learning Issue. ELT-Lectura: Studies and Perspectives in English Language Teaching. 8(1), 15–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/elt-lectura.v8i1.5977

[4] Almahasees, Z., Mahmoud, S., 2022. Persuasive strategies utilized in the political speeches of King Abdullah II: A critical discourse analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 9(1), 2082016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2082016

[5] Kentmen, H., Debreli, E., Yavuz, M.A., 2023. Assessing tertiary Turkish EFL learners’ pragmatic competence regarding speech acts and conversational implicatures. Sustainability, 15(4), 3800.

[6] Videla, C.G.B., Meneses, E,L., Diaz, J.M., 2020. Teachers' perception of educational challenges in the face of the COVID 19. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences. 7(3), 224–234.

[7] Altakhaineh, A.R., Hasheish, M.A., Hamaydeh, D., 2024. Pragmatic Failures in Intercultural Communication: Evidence from Jordan. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS. 36(2), 38–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2024-36-2-38-62

[8] Mardiningsih, Istiqomah, D.M., Mujiwati, Y., 2020. The Lecturers' Speech Act on Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic at PGRI Wiranegara University. Proceedings of the International Conference on Community Development (ICCD 2020); 18, July 2020; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Volume 477, pp. 407–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201017.090

[9] Kumari, A.S., Sophia, M.S.C., Rani, T.S., 2020. Pragmatic Learning Activities in English Language in the COVID – 19 Period A Study of Paradigmatic Shift. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 17(6), 9175–9185.

[10] Alwreikat, E.A., Yunus, K.B., 2020. Conventional Errors in Employing English Prepositions in the Written Work of EFL Jordanian Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(3), 488–496. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i3/7065

[11] Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., Amin, M.O., 2021. Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education. 6, 638470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.638470

[12] Vu, N.M., 2017. Teaching pragmatics in English as a Foreign Language at a Vietnamese university: Teachers' perceptions, curricular content, and classroom practices [Doctoral dissertation]. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.

[13] Brown, P., Levinson, S., 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[14] Austin, J.L., 1962. How To Do Things With Words. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

[15] Searle, J.R., 1969. Speech acts: An essay in philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[16] Dalimunthem, N., 2020. Speech Acts Analysis of President Joko Widodo's Speech about COVID-19 [Bachelor's thesis]. Medan, Indonesia: University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.

[17] Godfroid, A., Hopp, H., (eds.). 2023. The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Psycholinguistics. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA.

[18] Holmes, J., Wilson, N., 2022. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821852

[19] Thomas. J., 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics. 4(2), 91–112.

[20] Kasper, G., Roever, C., 2005. Pragmatics in second language learning. In: Hinkel, E., (ed.). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum: New Jersey, USA. pp. 317–334.

[21] Al-Eryani, A., 2007. Refusal strategies by Yemeni EFL learners. Asian EFL Journal. 9(2), 19–34.

[22] Houck, N., Gass, S., 1996. Non-native refusals: A methodological perspective. In: Gass, S., Neu, J. (eds.). Speech acts across cultures. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 45–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219289.1.45

[23] Kreishan, L., 2018. Politeness and Speech Acts of Refusal and Complaint among Jordanian Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 7(4), 68–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.4p.68

[24] Rafiq, R., Yavuz, M.A., 2024. Advancing English as second language communication: The effectiveness of online pragmatic training on essential speech acts. 10(11), e31763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31763

[25] Ghadiri, S., Tajeddin, Z., Alemi, M., 2024. Teacher corrective feedback on learners' pragmatic failure: Types of feedback in online pragmatics instruction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning. 16(33), 172–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/ELT.2024.60989.2624

[26] Huwari, I.F., Al-Khasawneh, F.M., Rababah, L.M., et al., 2023. An Intercultural Study of Refusal Strategies Used in Jordanian Arabic and American English. Information Sciences Letters. 12(7), 3159–3166.

[27] Simamora, R.M., 2020. The Challenges of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Essay Analysis of Performing Arts Education Students. Studies in Learning and Teaching. 1(2), 86–103.

[28] Al-Issa, F.A., 2003. Living on the Hyphen: The Literature of the Early Arab-Americans between 1870–1940.

[29] Taghizadeh, R., 2017. Pragmatic Competence in the Target Language: A Study of Iranian Learners of English [Doctoral dissertation]. Manchester, UK: University of Salford.

[30] Brown, J.D., 2001. Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[31] Denscombe, M. 2003. The good research guide, 2nd ed. Open University Press: Berkshire, UK.

[32] Kusevska, M., Ulanska, T., Ivanovska, B., et al., 2015. Assessing Pragmatic Competence of L2 Learners. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 149–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14706/JFLTAL152312

[33] Taguchi, N., 2015. Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching. 48(1), 1–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263

[34] Blake, R.J., 2016. Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology. 20(2), 129–142.

[35] Taguchi, N., (ed.). 2019. The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–14.

[36] Holmes, L., 2013. Competing perspectives on graduate employability: possession, position or process? Studies in higher education. 38(4), 538–554.

[37] Mills, S., 2003. Gender and politeness. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238

[38] Yates, L., 2015. Rethinking prefiguration: Alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 1–21.

Downloads

How to Cite

Al Mseideen, A., Binti Yunus, K., & Almahasees, Z. (2025). The Impact of Online Learning on the Pragmatic Competence of Refusal Speech Acts: Perspectives of Jordanian Instructors. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(3), 1026–1037. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8632

Issue

Article Type

Article