The Dichotomy of Declension and Prohibition: A Phonological Investigation

Authors

  • Lina Al-Jarrah

    Department of Basic Sciences, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan
  • Raeda Ammari

    Department of English Language and Translation, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan
  • Tariq Mohammed Farghal

    Department of English Language and Translation, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan
  • Malak Ismael

    Department of Arabic Language Department, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8845
Received: 23 February 2025 | Revised: 14 March 2025 | Accepted: 17 March 2025 | Published Online: 19 March 2025

Abstract

The present study investigates a prominent grammatical topic that has garnered considerable attention among grammarians, specifically the “prohibition of declension.” There is a widespread consensus among grammarians regarding certain words that do not undergo declension and instead function as comparative bases. The methodology employed in this study entails presenting perspectives from both ancient and contemporary grammarians on this subject. The researchers’ primary objective is to substantiate that the occurrence or absence of declension cannot be attributed to the reasons commonly posited by grammarians but can be explained by the principle of linguistic economy. This principle encompasses phonetic reduction or assimilation through phonetic analysis. By examining the data of declension cases categorically and qualitatively, the study illustrates how different syntactic contexts determine the inflection status of declension, highlighting that this phenomenon is a form of impoverishment that subjugates the Case to its morphological requirements. The study also highlights that declension involves an interface between morphology, phonology, and syntax. This interface incorporates plurality, proper nouns, and morphological sensitivity on the one hand while catering to phonological alterations of the Case-ending market based on the syntactic position of the noun. Therefore, the study contributes to understanding the syntactic impoverishment of declension of Standard Arabic, highlighting that the non-application of a normative rule within grammar is universally mirrored in other cases in different languages, including over-generalization, irregularities, and idiosyncrasy. The study also delves into supporting the principle of economy, demonstrating that declension is economically formed through choice vs. rejection of the optimal output within the syntactic context.

Keywords:

Dichotomy; Grammar; Declension; Reduction; Morphology; Phonetic; Plural

References

[1] Ahammad, S.S. 2017. The noun: A comparative analysis between the Arabic and the English languages. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). 22(5), 64–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2205016473

[2] Ibn Manzur, M.1993. bab al-sarf [The Chapter on Morphology] (n.d.). Lisan al-Arab [The Tongue of Arabs]. Dar Sader: Beirut, Lebanon. pp. 189–191.

[3] Salih, H., Devi, M., Ali, D., et al., 2023. A computational analysis of Arabic noun morphology. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6, 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.3.6

[4] Qarabesh, M. 2018. Case endings in Standard Arabic: A linguistic analysis. Majallat Al-Adab. (6)1, 306–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35696/.v1i6.503

[5] Al-Tahnawi, M., 1963. harf al-mi:m kashshaf ilstilahat al-funuun [The Chapter on the Letter mi:m]. In: Abdel, Badie, L. (ed.). A Glossary of Technical Terms in the Arts. Egyptian Foundation: Cairo, Egypt. p. 242.

[6] Saif, A., 2024. Comparison between the characteristics of inflectional systems in Arabic and English languages. International Journal of English Linguistics. 7, 94–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n1p94

[7] Sibawayh, A., 2009. bab ma yansarif wa ma la yansfrif [Chapter of What Declines and What Does Not Decline]. In: Haroun, A. M. (ed.). Al-Kitab [The Book]. Al-Khanji Library: Cairo, Egypt. Volume 5(3), pp. 190–205.

[8] Ahmed, A. T., 2023. Grammatical convergence between inflection and non-inflection of nouns in Arabic language. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities. 30(7, 1), 124–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25130/jtuh.30.7.1.2023.08

[9] Ibn Asfour, A., 1980. fasl aziyada [Chapter of Argumentation].In: Mohammed, A.I. (ed.). darair al-shi'r [Poetic Necessities]. Dar Al-Andalus: Beirut, Lebanon. pp. 22–30.

[10] Elgobshawi, A. E., 2024. Conceptualization of morphological roots in Arabic and English: A contrastive analysis. World Journal of English Language. 14(5), 436–442.

[11] Al-Mubarrad, A., 1994. hatha bab na yajri wa ma la yajri [This is the Chapter on What Applied and What Does not Apply], In Azimah, M.A. (ed.). Al-Muqtadib [The Concise]. Committee for the Revival of Islamic Heritage: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 309–320.

[12] Alfara', A., 1983. surat al-baqara [Chatper of the Cow]. m'aani al-kuraan [Meanings of the Qur'an]. Alam al-Kutub: Beirut, Lebanon. pp. 40–61.

[13] Ibn al-Sarraj, A., 1996. thikir ma yansarif min al-asma' wa ma la yansarif [Mentioning the Nouns that Decline and those that Do Not Decline], In: Al-Fatli, A. (ed.). al-usuul fi-nahu [Principles of Grammar]. Al-Resala Foundation: Beirut, Lebanon. pp. 150–165.

[14] Ibn Jinni, A., 1988. bab fi maqayees al-arab [Arab Metrics]. In: Al-Najjar, M. A., (.e.d). al-khsa'is [Characteristics]. Scientific Library: Cairo, Egypt, pp. 210–230.

[15] Al-Zajjaji, A., 1984. bab yansarif wa ma la yansarif [Chapter of What Declines and What Does Not Decline]. Al-Hamad, A. (ed.). Al-Jamal fi nahu [Sentences in Syntax]. Al-Resala Foundation: Beirut, Lebanon & Dar Al-Amal: Irbid, Jordan. pp. 98–115.

[16] Jalabneh, A., 2009. Multiple functions of the nunations in Arabic syntax: A minimalist perspective. Dirasat, Human and Social Sciences, 36(3), 687-–707.

[17] Wilder, C., Gärtner, H.M., Bierwisch, M. (Eds.), 2018. The role of economy principles in linguistic theory. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG: Berlin, Germany. p. 40.

[18] Rfa'i, A.I., 2017. The declension of diptotes and the prevention of the declined. Journal of Educator. 11(1), 5–29.

[19] Al-Suyuti, I. 2001. al-bab athani ma la yansarif [Chapter Two: What Does Not Decline]. In: Haroun, A., Makram, A. (Exp. & Ver.). ham'a al-hawam'i fi sharh al-jawa'I [The Swarming of Tears in the Commentary on the Comprehensive Collections]. Alam al-Kutub: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 245–265.

[20] Al-Shayeb, F., 1996. Man' al-sarf bayn al-isti'ma; wa ataqyeed an-nahawi [Preventing Conjugation between Usage and Grammatical Restriction]. Journal of the Arabic Language Academy in Damascus. 71(4), 695–767.

[21] Al-Samin A.A., 1987. Surat Al-Insan [The Chapter of The Man]. In: Al-Kharraat, A.M. (ed.). Al-Durr Al-Masun fi Ulum Al-Kitab Al-Maknoun [The Preserved Pearls in the Sciences of the Hidden Book]. Dar Al-Qalam: Damascus, Syria. pp. 590–615.

[22] Ibn Aqeel, B., 2005. ma la yansarif [Nouns Exempt from Declension]. In: Abdul Hamid, M.M. (ed.). Ibn Aqeel's Commentary on Ibn Malik's Alfiyyah [Ibn Aqil's Commentary on Alfiya]. Dar al Turath Library: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 245–265.

[23] Medjedoub, R., 2022. Noun inflectional morphology in English and Arabic. Journal of Linguistic Studies, 33, 9–22.

[24] Ryding, K.C., 2021. Case in Arabic. In: K. Ryding & D. Wilmsen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 353–370.

[25] Al-Qaisi, A., 1974. surat al-insan [The Chapter of The Man]. Ramadan, M. (ed.). al-kashif ‘an wjuuh al-qira'at al-sabi' wa ‘ililha wa hajimha [Revealing the Faces of the Seven Readings, Their Reasons, and Their Proofs]. Publications of the Arabic Language Academy: Damascus, Syria. pp. 300–320.

[26] Ibn Zanjleh, A. 1982. surat al-insan (The Chapter of The Man). In: Al-Afghani, S. (ed.). hujjat al qira'at [Argument of Reading]. Al-Resala Foundation: Beirut, Lebanon. pp. 735–750.

[27] Ibn Hisham, J., 2009. fi khruuj itha ‘an al-shartiya [On the Departure of ‘if' from Conditionality], In: Abdl al Hamid, M. M. (ed.). Mughni al-Labib on the Books of Arabs [The Sufficient Guide for the Eluciation of Grammar]. Dar al Tala`i: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 205–215.

[28] Abu Hayyan A.M. 1999. surat nouh [The Chapter of Noah]. Jamil, S. M. (ed.). Tafsir Al-Bahr, Al-Muhit [The Interpretation of the Vast Ocean]. Dar Al-Fikr: Beirut, Lebanon. pp. 280–290.

[29] Al-Anbari, A., 2002. hal yaguuz sarf af'al atl-tafdil fi dharorat al-sh'ir [Is it Permissible to Decline the Comparative From af'al at-atafdil in Poetic Necessity?] al-insaf fi msa'il al-khilaf bayn al-nahaween wa al-basriyeen [Fairness in Issues of Disagreement between Grammarians and Basraists]. Mabrout, J. M. M. (ed.) & Abd Tawab, R. (rev.). Al-Khanji Library: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 390–400.

[30] Al-Qais, I., 2008. bab al-ba' [The Chapter of the Letter ba'], In: Ibrahim, M. A. (ed.). Diwan of Imru' al-Qais [Collection of Imru' Al-Qais Poems]. Dar al-Ma'arif: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 45–55.

[31] Al-Sukari, A., 1965. sharh ash‘ar al-hudhaliyyin [Explanation of the Poetry of Al Hudhaliyyin]. Farraj, A. A. (ed.) & Shaker, M. (Rev). Al-Madani Press and Dar Al-Urouba Library: Cairo, Egyp. p. 1268.

[32] Ibn Haddad, H., 1984. mu'jam shawahid al-nahw al-shi'riyyah [Dictionary of Evidence of Poetic Grammar]. 1st ed. Dar Al-Ulum for Printing and Publishing: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. pp. 877.

[33] Ibn Qais Al-Ruqayat, U., 1985. diwan ubaid allah bin qais al-ruqayat [The Collected Poems of Ubaid Allah bin Qais Al-Ruqayat. Najm, M. Y. (ed.). Dar Sader: Beirut, Lebanon. p. 3.

[34] Ibn Mardas Al-Sulaimi, A., 1991. qafiyat al-‘ayn [The Rhyme of the Letter ‘Ayn]. Al-Jubouri, Y. (ed.). diwan al-‘abbas bin mardas al-sulaimi [The Diwan of Al-Abbas bin Mardas Al-Sulaimi]. Al-Resala Foundation: Beirut, Lebanon. p. 112.

[35] Ibn Yaish, M., 1900. Asbab man' al-fasil [Reasons for Prohibiting Inflection]. Jacob, A.B. (ed.). Sharh al Mufassal [Explanation of al-Mufassal]. Al-Muniriyah Printing Department: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 65–80.

[36] Abd Tawab, R., 1995. karahit tawali al-amthali fi abniyat al-arabiya [The Aversion to the Repetition of Examples in the Structures of Arabic]. Buhuuth wa maqalaat fil al-lugha [Research and Articles in Language]. Al-Khanji Library: Cairo, Egypt, pp. 25–40.

[37] Dimashqiyya, A., 1987. Al-qira'at al-qur'aniyya wa al-mamnu' min al-sarf [Quranic Readings and the Prohibited from Declension] athar al-qira'at al-qur'aniyya fi tatawwur al-dars al-naḥwi [The Impact of Qur'anic Readings on the Development of Grammatical Lessons]. Institute for Arab Development: Beirut, Lebanon, pp. 150–175.

[38] Ibn Burd, B., 1957. Qafiyat arra' [The Rhyme of the Letter raa']. Ibn Ashour, M.A. (ed.) & Amin, M.S. (Rev.). diwan Bashar Ibn Burd [The Collection of Bashar Ibn Burd Poems]. Authorship and Translation Committee: Cairo, Egypt. pp. 95–110.

[39] Ibn al-Khatim, Q., 1962. kasi:da: tathakkar Layla husnaha wa safa'aha [Poem: Remembering Layla, Her Beauty, and Her Purity]. In: Al-Assad, N. (ed.). diwaan qais bin al-khatim ‘an ibn Sukait wa gharuhu [Diwan of Qais bin al-Khatim on the authority of Ibn Sukait and among others]. Dar al-Urouba Library: Cairo, Egypt, pp. 25–35.

Downloads

How to Cite

Al-Jarrah , L., Ammari, R., Farghal, T. M., & Ismael , M. (2025). The Dichotomy of Declension and Prohibition: A Phonological Investigation. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(3), 1010–1025. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8845

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 3 (March 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Lina Al-Jarrah , Raeda Ammari, Tariq Mohammed Farghal, Malak Ismael

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.