Language Learning Barriers and Cross-Cultural Communication Strategies in Tibetan Bilingual Education Against the Background of Cultural Differences

Authors

  • Minghui Wang

    Faculty of Education and Sport Studies, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah 88400, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.8991
Received: 6 March 2025 | Revised: 1 April 2025 | Accepted: 29 April 2025 | Published Online: 16 June 2025

Abstract

This research analyses the intricate hurdles encountered by Tibetan learners trying to learn Mandarin Chinese in the context of bilingual education in the Amdo Tibetan Area of Qinghai, China. Through qualitative research approaches like semi-structured interviews with students and teachers, classroom observations, and document analysis, this research identifies linguistic and cultural barriers that impede effective language learning. It was found that Tibetan students have difficulties relating to the Mandarin language’s phonological elements, character writing, and even its abstract vocabulary when these features are devoid of their cultural contexts and environments. Urban culture curriculum centred on teaching a modern lifestyle creates a cultural gap which leads to low motivation and understanding among learners. This research aims to contribute to the literature through the description of effective cross-cultural communication techniques in the specific context of Tibetan-Mandarin bilingual education, specifically bilingual scaffolding, culturally sensitive pedagogy, and participatory teaching that effectively deal with linguistic problems without erasing cultural identity. The use of Tibetan culture, visual aids, and group work activities that encourage student participation is suggested to enhance student motivation and achievement in the language. This research contributes to bilingual educational policy and practice in China’s ethnic minority regions by proposing that flexible integration of language and culture tends to be more successful in achieving Mandarin proficiency than the more inflexible, monolingual mode of instruction. Relating this study to Chinese Literacy Teaching Theory and social constructivism allows the study to make recommendations for improving bilingual education in culturally diverse settings from a theoretical perspective.

Keywords:

Tibetan Bilingual Education; Mandarin Second Language Acquisition; Cross-cultural Communication; Language Barriers; Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

References

[1] Zhang, L., Tsung, L.T., 2019. Tibetan bilingual education in Qinghai: Government policy vs family language practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 22(3), 290–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1503226

[2] Jiang, Y., 2025. Factors Influencing Tibetan College Students' Willingness to Communicate in Their Second Language in China: A Mixed Methods Study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12689

[3] Gan, Y., Sude, S., 2021. Bilingual students' attitudes toward the Tibetan language: A structural analysis. Language Problems and Language Planning. 45(1), 1–30.

[4] Tournadre, N., 2014. The Tibetic Languages and their Classification. In: Owen-Smith, T., Hill, N. (eds.). Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Boston. pp. 105–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110310832.105

[5] Danzeng, Y., 2024. Mapping knowledge dynamics: social network analysis of English as a third language acquisition in Tibetan classrooms. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 15, 18303–18327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01879-z

[6] Liu, D., 2020. Comparative Quantitative Analysis of Tibetan and English Language and Culture in China from 1981 to 2019. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Education, Language and Inter-cultural Communication (ELIC 2020); November 2020; 21-22 2020; Zhengzhou, China. Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 54–58. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.201127.009

[7] Wang, L., Lehtomäki, E., 2022. Bilingual education and beyond: how school settings shape the Chinese Yi minority's socio-cultural attachments. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 25(6), 2256–2268.

[8] He, H., 2021. Division to Unification: Concept of the Chinese Nation Behind Bilingual Education Policies in the Sichuan Tibetan Area [PhD Thesis]. University of Washington: Seattle, WA, USA.

[9] Xue, E., Li, J., 2020. Top-down education policy on the inclusion of ethnic minority population in China: A perspective of policy analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 52(3), 227–239.

[10] Chen, L., Li, W.J., Ning, Y., 2020. Cross-cultural nursing's systematic model and its application in minority patients in China. TMR Integrative Nursing. 4(1), 9–14.

[11] Zhang, W., Kam-Kwai, W., Xu, B., et al., 2024. CultiVerse: Towards cross-cultural understanding for paintings with large language model. arXiv:2405.00435 [cs.HC], submitted. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.00435

[12] Zhao, P., Hassan, A., Burhanuddin, N.A.N., 2024. A systematic review of factors influencing English language competency for ethnic minority students: an ecological systems theory perspective. Cogent Education. 11(1), 2415730.

[13] Sherman, B., Morita-Mullaney, T., Renn, J., 2025. Speaking Up, Pushing Back, Closing the Door: Agency of Open and Covert Teacher Resistance in Dual-Language Bilingual Education. AERA Open. 11, 23328584241311818.

[14] Bialystok, E., 2018. Bilingual education for young children: review of the effects and consequences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 21(6), 666–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1203859

[15] Bai, B., Zang, X., 2025. Bilingual learning motivation and engagement among students in Chinese-English bilingual education programmes in Mainland China: competing or coexistent?. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2449071

[16] Manrique, A.M., Izquierdo, R.P.L., Becerra, D.S., et al., 2025. Policy Management in Early Childhood Development in Intercultural Bilingual Schools of Manu National Park–2024, Seeking Quality Education (SDG 4). Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review. 5(1), e03908–e03908.

[17] Jayasooriya, L.B., Vickers, E., 2025. Bilingual education and identity politics in post-war Sri Lanka. Comparative Education. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2025.2460916

[18] Hu, G., 2005. English Language Education in China: Policies, Progress, and Problems. Lang Policy. 4, 5–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-004-6561-7

[19] Jin, L., Cortazzi, M., 2006. Changing practices in Chinese cultures of learning. Language, culture and curriculum. 19(1), 5–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668751

[20] Brown, G.T.L., Wang, Z., 2013. Illustrating assessment: How Hong Kong university students conceive of the purposes of assessment. Studies in Higher Education. 38(7), 1037–1057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616955

[21] García, O., Wei, L., 2014. Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765

[22] Cummins, J., 2021. Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413597

[23] Duarte, J., 2019. Translanguaging in mainstream education: A sociocultural approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 22(2), 150–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231774

[24] Cuo, Y., Suo, L., 2024. Transition of medium of instruction in bilingual education in Aba Prefecture: Translanguaging, attitudes and local adjustment. Chinese Language and Discourse. 15(2), 244–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.24013.cuo

[25] Sun, Z., 2024. The development and reform of bilingual education in China. Journal of Social Science Humanities and Literature. 7(1), 132–143.

[26] Ying, J., 2024. Education for development: Professional commitments and practices among Tibetan teachers in northwest China. Educational Review. 76(7), 1842–1856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2170331

[27] Leibold, J., Dorjee, T., 2024. Learning to be Chinese: colonial-style boarding schools on the Tibetan plateau. Comparative Education. 60(1), 118–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2023.2250969

[28] Zhao, G., Li, W., Chang, C.H., 2024. Bilingual education in a globalized age: an ecological perspective on two Chosonjuk schools in China. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 27(4), 522–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2023.2248170

[29] Zhang, J., Pérez-Milans, M., 2018. Structures of feeling in language policy: The case of Tibetan in China. Language Policy. 18(1), 39–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9464-4

[30] Johnson, B., 2000. The politics, policies, and practices in linguistic minority education in the People's Republic of China: The case of tibet. International Journal of Educational Research. 33(6), 593–600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00036-9

[31] John, A., Levshits, A., 2024. Enhancing language and linguistic proficiency through Project-Based Learning: A Study from South India. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(5), 326–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59022/fls.2024.6.5.326

[32] John, A., 2024. Gamification in English language teaching: A pathway to fostering teacher-student rapport, teacher immediacy and students' willingness to communicate. XLinguae. 17(4), 47–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.04.04

[33] John, A., 2025. Revolutionizing STEAM Education: Harnessing the Power of AI and Digital Technology to Deliver Personalized Learning Experiences. In: Nguyen, D.S. (ed.). Integrating Personalized Learning Methods Into STEAM Education. IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA. pp. 143–168.

[34] Tong, L., 2023. Disenchantment Revisited: Schooling of Tibetan Students in Northwest China [PhD Thesis]. University of Macau: Macau, China.

[35] Yu, J., 2020. Imaginative travellers in-situ: A case study of Chinese students at a UK transnational higher education institution [PhD Thesis]. The University of Manchester: Manchester, UK.

[36] Lhagyal, D., 2024. Ethnic Diversity and State Multiculturalism: Critiquing the 'Color-Blind'Approach in China's Minzu Higher Education. Journal of Contemporary China. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2024.2427416

[37] Feng, Y., 2024. Patriotic Education in China's Ethnic Minority Areas: A Case Study of Primary School Textbooks in Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Qinghai Province. Proceedings of the 2024 9th International Conference on Modern Management, Education and Social Sciences (MMET 2024); 20th September 2024; Xiamen, China. Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 352–359.

[38] He, C., Gesang, Q., Qun, N., et al., 2024. Research on Tibetan-Chinese Machine Translation Method Based on Graphic Multimodal Fusion Alignment. Proceedings of the 2024 6th International Conference on Internet of Things, Automation and Artificial Intelligence (IoTAAI); 26–28 July 2024; Guangzhou, China. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA. pp. 714–717.

[39] Cummins, J., 2021. Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413597

[40] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[41] Stoller, F.L., 2004. Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 24, 143–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000073

[42] Ochs, E., Schieffelin, B.B., 2017. Language Socialization: An Historical Overview. In: Duff, P.A., May, S. (eds.). Language Socialization, 3rd ed. Springer: New York, NY, USA. pp. 3–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02327-4_1-2

[43] Cummins, J., 2021. Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800413597

[44] Epstein, J.L., 2018. School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools, 2nd ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494673

[45] Nieto, S., 2018. Language, culture, and teaching: Critical perspectives, 3rd ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315120041

[46] Moll, L.C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., et al., 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice. 31(2), 132–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534

[47] Shaw, S., Copland, F., Snell, J. (Eds.), 2015. Linguistic Ethnography: Interdisciplinary Explorations. Palgrave Macmillan: London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035035

Downloads

How to Cite

Wang , M. (2025). Language Learning Barriers and Cross-Cultural Communication Strategies in Tibetan Bilingual Education Against the Background of Cultural Differences. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6), 999 –. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.8991

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 6 (July 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Minghui Wang

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.