Toxic Talk and Narrative Power in Virtual Arenas: A Pragmatic-Narrative Analysis of Impoliteness in Online Game Communication

Authors

  • Nensilanti

    Department of Language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Literature, Makassar State University, Makassar 90141, Indonesia
  • Andi Sahtiani Jahrir

    Department of Language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Literature, Makassar State University, Makassar 90141, Indonesia
  • Suarni Syam Saguni

    Department of Language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Literature, Makassar State University, Makassar 90141, Indonesia
  • Mahmudah

    Department of Language Education, Postgraduate Studies, Makassar State University, Makassar 90141, Indonesia
  • Andi Muh. Fadjrin Husain Subhan

    Department of Language and Literature, Faculty of Language and Literature, Makassar State University, Makassar 90141, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9945
Received: 10 April 2025 | Revised: 20 May 2025 | Accepted: 30 May 2025 | Published Online: 8 June 2025

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of language impoliteness in digital communication, especially in online game chat media, using the framework of the theory of impoliteness from Jonathan Culpeper in a pragmatic study. As multiplayer games evolve as complex social interaction spaces, the feature of chats between players is often an arena for speech that is not only aggressive and offensive but also strategic and meaningful. This study aims to identify the form, function, and contextual triggers of impoliteness players use in competitive and dynamic gaming environments. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with documentation techniques as the primary data collection method. Data is collected from Mobile Legends game chat logs and relevant content from popular social media such as Instagram and TikTok. Data analysis was carried out through the stages of reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions based on five strategies of impoliteness within the framework of Culpeper: bald on record, positive impoliteness, negative impoliteness, mock politeness (sarcasm), and withhold politeness. The study results show that rude speech is used not only as an emotional expression but also as a tool to build dominance, provoke opponents, and strengthen group identity. Repetitive use of rudeness forms a narrative pattern that reflects norms, conflicts, power, and alliances within the digital community. Abusive speech not only acts as face-threatening acts but also becomes part of a social storyline that builds interaction dynamics in the online gaming community. This study makes a real contribution to developing the study of digital pragmatics and narrative linguistics.

 

Keywords:

Impoliteness; Pragmatics; Online Game Chat; Digital Communication; Language Aggression

References

[1] Ismi, N., Akmal, A., 2020. The impact of online games on student behavior in the environment of SMA Negeri 1 Bayang [in Indonesian]. Journal of Civic Education. 3(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v3i1.304

[2] Idrees, F., 2020. A socio-pragmatic analysis of the impact of impoliteness and aggressive language in violent online games on the players. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. 3(1), 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.1.1

[3] Colaco, L., Vijayarajoo, A., Lin, T., 2021. The use of impoliteness strategies in online feedback relating to a general election in media. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 11(9), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/10975

[4] Ningsih, P., 2023. An analysis of the impact of Mobile Legends online game use on elementary school children [in Indonesian]. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 5(2), 1719–1734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i2.5520

[5] Dimas, A.P., Siswanti, D.N., Ansar, W., 2023. The relationship between adult attachment and emotion regulation in early adulthood [in Indonesian]. PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora. 2(6), 1133–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v2i6.2388.

[6] Azhari, G.F., Nugrahawati, E.N., Dwarawati, D., 2018. The relationship between positive emotion and online impulsive buying in students of Bandung Islamic University [in Indonesian]. Prosiding Psikologi. 6(2), 776-781.

[7] Roleh, A.R., Mandang, J.H., Kumaat, T.D., 2023. The relationship between emotional intelligence levels and aggressive behavior tendencies among online game players in Buha Village, South Tagulandang, Sitaro. Psikopedia. 4(1), 11–6. DOI: https://doi.org10.53682/pj.v4i1.6990

[8] Hanifah, R., 2023. Introducing basic emotions and anti-bullying as an effort to increase empathy awareness in society [in Indonesian]. Jurnal Pengabdian, Riset, Kreativitas, Inovasi, dan Teknologi Tepat Guna. 1(2), 225–233. DOI: https//doi.org/10.22146/parikesit.v1i2.9718

[9] Prasetya, M.R., Hidayah, N., 2023. Emotion regulation training as a strategy to improve adolescents’ ability to manage negative emotions [in Indonesian]. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan. 6(12), 10102–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i12.2432.

[10] Stojak, D., 2024. Courtesy under fire: a structural and contextual analysis of toxic language in online gaming. Social Communication. 25(1), 112–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57656/sc-2024-0011

[11] Märtens, M., Shen, S., Iosup, A., et al., 2015. Toxicity Detection in Multiplayer Online Games. In Proceedings of The 2015 International Workshop on Network and Systems Support for Games (NetGames), Zagreb, Croatia, 3–4 December 2015; pp. 1–6.

[12] Hass, J.R., Wächter, S., 2014. Impoliteness in computer-mediated communication: A cultural perspective. Revista EducaOnline. 8(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18247/1983-2664/educaonline.v8n1p1-12

[13] Graham, S.L., 2018. Impoliteness and the moral order in online gaming. impoliteness and moral order in online interactions, Internet Pragmatics. 1(2), 303–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00014.lam

[14] Khazraie, M., Talebzadeh, H., 2020. Wikipedia does NOT tolerate your babbling!”: Impoliteness-induced conflict (resolution) in a polylogal collaborative online community of practice. Journal of Pragmatics. 163, 46–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.009

[15] Jay, T., 2018. Swearing, moral order, and online communication. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 6(1), 107–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00005.jay.

[16] Nasution, M., 2017. Language impoliteness in Jakarta Lawyers Club talk show 2014. Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Manajemen. 4(2), 77–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v4i2.89

[17] Akinmusuyi, S., 2023. Stop this nonsense, Harry!”: An analysis of impoliteness strategies in cyberbullying commentary targeting Harry Maguire. Journal of Languages Linguistics and Literary Studies. 3(4), 183–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57040/jllls.v3i4.541

[18] Kavanagh, E., Litchfield, C., Osborne, J., 2019. Sporting women and social media: sexualization, misogyny, and gender-based violence in online spaces. International Journal of Sport Communication. 12(4), 552–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2019-0079

[19] Bossetta, M., 2018. The digital architectures of social media: comparing political campaigning on facebook, twitter, instagram, and snapchat in the 2016 u.s. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 95(2), 471–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307

[20] Errasti, J., Vázquez, I., Villadangos, M., 2017. Emotional uses of facebook and twitter: its relation with empathy, narcissism, and self-esteem in adolescence. Psychological Reports. 120(6), 997–1018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117713496

[21] Nuranti, B.R., 2023. The influence of website quality on online consumer emotions, perceived risk, and purchase intention [in Indonesian]. ProBank. 8(1), 37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36587/probank.v8i1.1450.

[22] Irawati, R.A., Sujatna, E.T.S., Yuliawati, S., 2023. Netizens’ sarcastic impoliteness strategies in the comment section of Ganjar Pranowo’s Instagram account [in Indonesian]. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya. 6(3), 911–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v6i3.739.

[23] Varma, T., 2020. Moral solidarity and mediated visibility: Narrative framing of marginalised voices in Indian journalism. Journalism Studies. 23(3), 315–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.2017976

[24] Lohman, J., 2015. On the edge of a digital society – Using digital storytelling to empower refugee children in Denmark. Journal of Youth Studies. 18(9), 1164–1178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1020934

[25] Vivienne, S., 2011. Mediating Identity Narratives: a case study in queer digital storytelling as everyday activism. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. 1(IR 12), 1–19. DOI: https://spir.aoir.org/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8727.

[26] Bamberg, M., 2006. Stories: Big or small—Why do we care? Narrative Inquiry. 16(1), 139–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.16.1.18bam

[27] De Fina, A., Georgakopoulou, A., 2012. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. John Benjamins Publishing Company: London, UK.

[28] Salimi, E.A., Mortazavi, S.M., 2023. “I Keep Forgetting You’re Still Alive”: Unmasking Impoliteness in the Xsphere. Language Teaching Research Quarterly. 38, 18–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.38.02

[29] Culpeper, J., 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics. 25(3), 349–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3

[30] Culpeper, J., 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA. USA.

[31] Terkourafi, M., 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In: Bousfield, D., Locher, M.A., (eds.). Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, vol. 3. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 45–74.

[32] Graham, S.L., Hardaker, C., 2017. Im)politeness in digital communication. In: Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., Kádár, D.Z., (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp.. 785–814.

[33] Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., 2018. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. SAGE: Los Angeles, LA, USA.

[34] Moleong, L.J., 2018. Qualitative Research Methodology [in Indonesian]. PT Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung, Indonesia.

[35] Azungah, T., 2018. Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal. 18(4), 383–400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035

[36] Androutsopoulos, J., 2016. Networked multilingualism: Digital communication and the mixing of languages. In: Georgakopoulou, A., Spilioti, T., (eds.). The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 255–270.

[37] Graham, S.L., 2008. A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in online gaming. In: Bousfield, D., Locher, M.A., (eds.). Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, vol. 4. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 281–304.

[38] Ghosh, S., 2021. Investigating online toxicity through a sociopragmatic lens. Language and Communication. 80, 31–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.06.002

[39] Steltenpohl, C.N., 2018. GG EZ”: Communicative practices of incivility in competitive gaming. Games and Culture. 13(8), 779–798. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412017720065

[40] Kristina, A., Achsan, D., 2024. The role of community identity in changing online gamers’ behavior. Digital Theory, Culture & Society. 2(1), 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61126/dtcs.v2i1.34.

[41] Bousfield, D., Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P., 2021. Impoliteness in the digital age. Journal of Pragmatics. 181, 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.001

[42] Gandolfi, E., Ferdig, R.E., Immel, Z., 2021. Gaming as literacy: Developing digital literacies through digital games. TechTrends. 65, 98–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00560-w

[43] Stephan, S., Bülow, L., 2017. On the Pragmatics of “In-Game” Chat Communication. Alkalmazott Nyelvtudomány: Hungarian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 17(2), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18460/ANY.2017.2.002.

Downloads

How to Cite

Nensilanti, Jahrir, A. S., Saguni, S. S., Mahmudah, & Husain Subhan, A. M. F. (2025). Toxic Talk and Narrative Power in Virtual Arenas: A Pragmatic-Narrative Analysis of Impoliteness in Online Game Communication. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9945

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 6 (July 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Nensilanti, Andi Sahtiani Jahrir, Suarni Syam Saguni, Mahmudah, Andi Muh. Fadjrin Husain Subhan

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.