Development and Psychometric Assessment of the Dyslexia Awareness Instrument in Teachers

Authors

  • Hilal Yıldırım

    Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Inonu University, Malatya, 44280, Turkey
  • Erman Yıldız

    Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Inonu University, Malatya, 44280, Turkey
  • Rukuye Aylaz

    Department of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Inonu University, Malatya, 44280, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v5i4.5770

Abstract

Dyslexia is a specific learning disability that is neurobiological in origin. It is characterized by difficulties with accurate and/or fluent word recognition and by poor spelling and decoding abilities. Teachers may not be very sure about the definition of dyslexia and generally struggle to tell the difference between dyslexic learners and slow learners. Developing the DyAwI may provide an important psychometric assessment tool in determining the awareness level of the teacher and being able to make this distinction. A descriptive, explorative design was used in this study. The study consisted of two main phases. In the first phase, in order to develop the instrument, a literature review and a pilot study on 20 primary school teachers were carried out, and in line with expert opinions, the content validity index was calculated. In the second stage, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to identify the construct validity and reliability. The study included 182 primary school teachers for the second stage. The KMO and Bartlett test values, which determine the suitability of DyAwI for factor analysis, were found to be 0.77 and 0.000, respectively. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value of DyAwI was .75. As a result of the assessment of its construct validity, the scale consisted of 2 factors and 14 items. The findings of the study show that the tool is reliable and sufficient. The instrument is easy to understand, and this tool can determine the dyslexia awareness levels of teachers. DyAwI could promote teachers’ awareness of dyslexia and support the early identification of primary school students with dyslexia. It is believed that, thanks to the data obtained from the instrument, teachers will be able to decide on an educational assessment of a student with reading difficulties more quickly.

Keywords:

Dyslexia; Learning disability; Awareness; Teachers; Psychometric assessment

References

[1] Yin, L., Joshi, R.M., Yan, H., 2020. Knowledge about dyslexia among early literacy teachers in China. Dyslexia. 26(3), 247-265.

[2] Balcı, E., 2019. Disleksi Hakkında Öğretmen Görüşleri ve Karşılaştıkları Sorunlar (Turkish) [Teachers’ Opinions About Dyslexia and the Challenges They Face]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi. 20, 162-179.

[3] van Setten, E. R. H., Hakvoort, B. E., van der Leij, A., Maurits, N. M., and Maassen, B. A. M., 2018. Predictors for grade 6 reading in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia. 68, 181-202.

[4] Shaywitz, S.E., Morris, R., Shaywitz, B.A., 2008. The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology. 59, 451-475.

[5] Kearns, D.M., Hancock, R., Hoeft, F., et al., 2019. The neurobiology of dyslexia. Teaching Exceptional Children. 51(3), 175-188.

[6] Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Fuchs, L.S., et al., 2018. Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. Guilford Publications: New York.

[7] Lyon, G.R., Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., 2003. A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia. 53, 1-14.

[8] Norton, E.S., Black, J.M., Stanley, L.M., et al., 2014. Functional neuroanatomical evidence for the double-deficit hypothesis of developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia. 61, 235-246.

[9] Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G., 2000. Naming-speed processes and developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the special issue on the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 33(4), 322-324.

[10] Ferrer, E., Shaywitz, B.A., Holahan, J.M., et al., 2015. Achievement gap in reading is present as early as first grade and persists through adolescence. The Journal of Pediatrics. 167(5), 1121-1125.

[11] Fortes, I.S., Paula, C.S., Oliveira, M.C., et al., 2016. A cross-sectional study to assess the prevalence of DSM-5 specific learning disorders in representative school samples from the second to sixth grade in Brazil. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 25, 195-207.

[12] Vlachos, F., Avramidis, E., Dedousis, G., et al., 2013. Prevalence and gender ratio of dyslexia in Greek adolescents and its association with parental history and brain injury. American Journal of Educational Research. 1(1), 22-25.

[13] American Psychiatric Association, 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.dsm5.org

[14] Alesi, M., Rappo, G., Pepi, A., 2012. Self-esteem at school and self-handicapping in childhood: Comparison of groups with learning disabilities. Psychological Reports. 111(3), 952-962.

[15] Taanila, A., Yliherva, A., Kaakinen, M., et al., 2011. An epidemiological study on Finnish school-aged children with learning difficulties and behavioural problems. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 70(1), 59-71.

[16] Lyon, G.R., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., et al., 2001. Rethinking learning disabilities. Rethinking special education for a new century. The Thomas B. Fordham Institute: Washington, D.C. pp. 259-287.

[17] Graziano, A.M., 2002. Developmental disabilities: Introduction to a diverse field. Allyn & Bacon: Boston.

[18] Queirós, F.C., Wehby, G.L., Halpern, C.T., 2015. Developmental disabilities and socioeconomic outcomes in young adulthood. Public Health Reports. 130(3), 213-221.

[19] Specific Learning Disorder [Internet]. American Psychiatric Association; 2013. Available from: https://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM-5-Specific-Learning-Disorder.pdf

[20] Emergent and Early Literacy Workshop: Current Status and Research Directions [Internet]. National Institutes of Health; 2000. Available from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/documents/EEL_workshop.pdf

[21] Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D., 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications: New York.

[22] Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., 2006. The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 29(5), 489-497.

[23] Balcı, E., 2017. Disleksi Hakkında Gerçekler: Disleksi Nedir ve Ne Değildir? (Turkish) [Facts about dyslexia: What is dyslexia and what is not?]. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 19, 1-17.

[24] Balcı, E., 2017. Disleksi: Tanımı, Sınıflandırması ve Belirtileri (Turkish) [Dyslexia: Definition, Classification and Symptoms]. SDU International Journal of Educational Studies. 4, 166-180.

[25] Doğan, B., 2013. Türkçe ve Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Okuma Güçlüğüne İlişkin Bilgileri ve Okuma Güçlüğü Olan Öğrencileri Belirleyebilme Düzeyleri (Turkish) [Determining Turkish language and elementary classroom teachers’ knowledge on dyslexia and their awareness of diagnosing students with dyslexia]. Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları. 1, 20-33.

[26] Poelmans, H., Luts, H., Vandermosten, M., et al., 2011. Reduced sensitivity to slow-rate dynamic auditory information in children with dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 32(6), 2810-2819.

[27] Soriano-Ferrer, M., Echegaray-Bengoa, J., Joshi, R.M., 2016. Knowledge and beliefs about developmental dyslexia in pre-service and in-service Spanish-speaking teachers. Annals of Dyslexia. 66, 91-110.

[28] Soriano-Ferrer, M., Echegaray-Bengoa, J.A., 2014. A scale of knowledge and beliefs about developmental dyslexia: Scale development and validation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 132, 203-208.

[29] Holmbeck, G.N., Devine, K.A., 2009. An author’s checklist for measure development and validation manuscripts. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 34(7), 691-696.

[30] Tavsancil, E., 2002. Tutumlarin olculmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara]. Ankara: Nobel Yayincilik.

[31] Wadlington, E.M., Wadlington, P.L., 2005. What educators really believe about dyslexia. Reading Improvement. 42(1), 16-33.

[32] Lopez-Escribano, C., Suro Sánchez, J., Leal Carretero, F., 2018. Prevalence of developmental dyslexia in Spanish University Students. Brain Sciences. 8(5), 82.

[33] Castillo, A., Gilger, J.W., 2018. Adult perceptions of children with dyslexia in the USA. Annals of Dyslexia. 68, 203-217.

[34] Balci, E., Cayir, A., 2018. Reading performance profile of children with dyslexia in primary and secondary school students. Journal of Education and Learning. 7(1), 80-87.

[35] Reyhan, D., 2017. Action research about development of reading and writing skills of dyslexic student. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science. 10(2), 320-334.

[36] Balcı, E., Çayır, A., 2017. Dyslexia, problems encountered and solution recommendations. Educational Research and Practice. 494-501.

[37] Salman, U., Özdemir, S., Salman, A. B., et al., 2016. Özel öğrenme güçlüğü “Disleksi”. (Turkish) [“Dyslexia”, the specific learning difficulty]. İstanbul Bilim Üniversitesi Florence Nightingale Tıp Dergisi. 2, 170-176.

[38] Asfuroğlu, B., Fidan, S., 2016. Özgül Öğrenme Güçlüğü/Spesific Learning Disorders (Turkish) [Spesific learning disorders]. Osmangazi Tıp Dergisi. 38, 49-54.

[39] Reid Lyon, G., Weiser, B., 2009. Teacher knowledge, instructional expertise, and the development of reading proficiency. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 42(5), 475-480.

[40] Lynn, M.R., 1986. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research. 35(6), 382-386.

[41] Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., 2010. Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia.

[42] Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş., 2016. Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları (Turkish) [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL practices]. Pegem Akademi.

[43] Kenny, D.A., 2014. Measuring Model Fit [Internet]. Available from: http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm

[44] Çapık, C., 2014. Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences. 17(3), 196-205.

[45] Gignac, G.E., 2009. Partial confirmatory factor analysis: Described and illustrated on the NEO-PI-R. Journal of Personality Assessment. 91(1), 40-47.

[46] Çoğaltay, N., Çetin, İ., 2020. Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Özel Öğrenme Güçlüğüne İlişkin Yeterlilikleri: Nitel Bir Araştırma (Turkish) [The Classroom Teachers’ Competencies Regarding to Special Learning Disabilities: A Qualitative Research]. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 5, 126-140.

[47] Kuruyer, H. G., Çakıroğlu, A., 2017. Sınıf öğretmenlerinin özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin eğitsel değerlendirme ve eğitimsel müdahale sürecinde görüş ve uygulamaları (Turkish) [Primary school teachers’ opinions and practices in educational evaluation and intervention in process of specific learning difficulties]. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic. 12, 539-555.

Downloads

How to Cite

Yıldırım, H., Yıldız, E., & Aylaz, R. (2023). Development and Psychometric Assessment of the Dyslexia Awareness Instrument in Teachers: Dyslexia Awareness Instrument. Journal of Psychological Research, 5(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v5i4.5770

Issue

Vol. 5 , Iss. 4 (October 2023)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2023 Hilal Yıldırım, Erman Yıldız, Rukuye Aylaz

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC