The experimental turn in philosophy of language

Authors

  • Xiang Zhou

    College of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Maritime University
  • Ya Gao

    College of Foreign Languages, Shanghai Maritime University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18063/fls.v2i1.1201

Abstract

With the rise of experimental philosophy in the twenty-first century, the past two decades have witnessed the experimental turn in the field of philosophy of language. We delineate in this paper the experimental turn in philosophy of language before distinguishing armchair theorizing from empirical testing and highlighting the complementarity between the two approaches, and then carry out an analysis of the experimental tools and methods available for philosophical experiments with examples by classifying them into three major types, viz., the method of survey, the method of big data, and the method of cognitive neuroscience.

Keywords:

experimental philosophy, philosophy of language, experimental method

References

Cappelen H (2012) Philosophy Without Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Colaco D, Buckwalter W, Stich S, et al. (2014) Epistemic intuitions in fake-barn thought experiments. Episteme 11(2): 199–212.

Crutch SJ and Warrington EK (2004) The semantic organisation of proper nouns: The case of people and brand names. Neuropsychologia 42(5): 584–596.

Dennett DC (1980) The milk of human intentionality (commentary on Searle). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 428–430.

Deutsch M (2009) Experimental philosophy and the theory of reference. Mind and Language 24(4): 445–466.

Deutsch M (2010) Intuitions, counter-examples, and experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(3): 447–460.

Devitt M (2012) Whither experimental semantics? Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27(1): 5–36.

Devitt M (2014) Linguistic intuitions are not “the voice of competence”. In: Haug MC (ed) Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory? New York: Routledge, pp.268.

Diaz R (2019) Using fMRI in experimental philosophy: Exploring the prospects. In: Fischer E and Curtis M (eds) Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp.131.

Greene JD, Sommerville RB, Nystrom LE, et al. (2001) An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293(5537): 2105–2108.

Hacquard V and Wellwood A (2012) Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study. Semantics and Pragmatics 5(4): 1–29.

Ichikawa JJ (2004) Who needs intuitions? Two experimentalist critiques. In: Booth A and Rowbottom D (eds) Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.232–256.

Ichikawa JJ and Jarvis B (2013) The Rules of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kornblith H (2014) Is there room for armchair theorizing in epistemology? In: Haug MC (ed) Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory? New York: Routledge, pp.195.

Leonelli S (2012) Introduction: Making sense of data-driven research in the biological and biomedical sciences. Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History & Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences 43(1): 1–3.

Lindquist KA, Wager TD, Kober H, et al. (2012) The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(3): 121.

Machery E, Mallon R, Nichols S, et al. (2004) Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition 92(3): B1–B12.

Nado J (2016) Advances in Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Methodology. London: Bloomsbury.

Nichols S, Stich S and Weinberg J (2003). Metaskepticism: Meditations in ethno-epistemology. The Skeptics 227–247.

Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, et al (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108(2): 291.

Papineau D (2014) The poverty of conceptual analysis. In: Haug MC (ed) Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory? New York: Routledge, pp.166.

Pietsch W (2013) Big data–the new science of complexity. Unpublished.

Starmans C and Friedman O (2012) The folk conception of knowledge. Cognition 124(3): 272–283.

Weinberg JM, Nichols S and Stich S (2001) Normativity and epistemic intuitions. Philosophical Topics 29(1/2): 429–460.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 2 , Iss. 1 (October 2020)

Article Type

Review

License

Copyright © 2020 Xiang Zhou, Ya Gao

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.