-
1968
-
1141
-
812
-
616
-
601
Critical Thinking Skills and Reading Proficiency among the English Language Students of Public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Sulu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6624Abstract
The sobering realization of the critical thinking and the difficulty in the language comprehension, specifically in English language piques the researcher's interest in learning more about the experiences of tertiary students majoring in English language studies at other public HEIs in Sulu. This study sought to investigate the significant difference in the extent of critical thinking skills and reading proficiency among the English language students. This study employed a variety of statistical techniques, including the adopted weighted mean, standard deviation, t-Test for independent samples, One-way ANOVA, and Pearson’s r test of correlation to analyze the reading comprehension and critical thinking skills among English language learners in Sulu's public HEIs throughout the 2023–2024 academic year. A surveyed has been conducted on 200 female students aged 20-21 from public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Sulu, revealing high critical thinking abilities and average reading proficiency ratings. Students' demographic profiles did not significantly influence their assessment of critical thinking or perceived reading proficiency. The study supports Anderson's Theory of Schema, which suggests that comprehension is an interactive process involving the reader's background knowledge and the text, requiring the ability to relate the material to one's own knowledge. The school administration will partner with language teachers to provide reading materials that enhance students' critical thinking skills and reading proficiency. Teachers must guide students to comprehend texts thoroughly, while parents play a crucial role in their children's future. Students will develop the ability to comprehend texts thorough through books and other reading materials provided by teachers. The objective of this study is to offer a foundation for upcoming researchers to enhance their own investigations on critical thinking abilities and reading competence within their field of study. The study will be conducted during the Academic Year 2023-2024 in Sulu province.
Keywords:
Critical thinking skills; Reading proficiency; Language; Higher education; InstitutionReferences
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., et al., 2015. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 85(2), 275–314.
Adams, M.J., Foorman, B.R., Lundberg, I., et al., 2018. Phonemic awareness in young children: Classroom curriculum. Brookes Publishing: Baltimore.
Alampay, G.P., Jocson, R.M., 2016. Reading proficiency and its predictors among Filipino children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Reading. 39(2), 131–150.
Cunningham, R.C., 2018. Effective reading strategies for increasing the reading comprehension level of third-grade students with learning disabilities. Second Language Studies. 34(1), 1–68.
Alvermann, D., Fitzgerald, J., Simpson, M.L., 2006. Research in teaching and learning in reading. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280625687_Research_in_teaching_and_learning_in_reading (cited 1 January 2024).
Bautista, A., 2015. Critical thinking in Philippine higher education. Philippine Journal of Education. 94(1), 1–19.
Bernardo, A.B.I., Abad, M.C., 2015. Reading proficiency and academic achievement among Filipino elementary students. Asia Pacific Education Review. 16(3), 383–396.
Brown, H.D., Lee, H., 2015. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Longman: New York.
Chavez, J.V., 2022. Narratives of bilingual parents on the Real-life use of english language: materials for english language teaching curriculum. Arab World English Journal. 13(3), 325–338. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.21
Chavez, J., Adalia, H., Alberto, J.P., 2023. Parental support strategies and motivation in aiding their children learn the English language. Forum for Linguistics Studies. 5(2), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i2.1541
Cadiz-Gabejan, A.M., Quirino, M.C., 2021. Students’ reading proficiency and academic performance. International Journal of English Language Studies. 3(6), 30–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2021.3.6.4
Chua, Y.P., 2018. Enhancing reading proficiency through culturally responsive approach: A case study of Filipino students. Reading Psychology. 39(1), 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i2.12
Cunningham, R.C., 2015. Needs analysis for a developmental reading, writing, and grammar course at a private language school in Cambodia. Available from: https://www.hawaii.edu/sls/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Cunningham.pdf (cited 15 March 2024).
De Gusman, A.B., De Gusman, M.R., 2019. Critical thinking skills of Filipino college students: An exploratory study. Journal of Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. 7(1), 19–32.
Dela Cruz, R.R., Magno, C., 2019. Factors influencing reading among Filipino college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(2), 165–185.
Delgadová, Elena., 2015. Reading literacy as one of the most significant academic competencies for the university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 178. 48-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.145
Duke, N.K., Pearson, P.D., 2016. Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In L.C. Moll (Ed.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 63–94). Guilford Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42748663
Ennis, R.H., 2015. Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 38(2), 129–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057_2
Estolas, R.B., 2017. Enhancing critical thinking skills through problem-based learning in the Philippines. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 7(12), 885–889.
Facione, P.A., 2015. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. 2–28. Available from: https://www.law.uh.edu/blakely/advocacy-survey/Critical%20Thinking%20Skills.pdf (cited 12 10 March).
Frankel, K., Becker, B., Rowe, M. W., et al., 2016. From "What is Reading?" to What is Literacy? Journal of Education. 196. 7–17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600303
Gabinete, A.C., Macasaet, M.M., 2016. Critical thinking disposition and skills of Filipino college students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 3(4), 19–26.
Halpern, D.F., 2015. Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 70(9), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
Hiebert, E., 2023. Thinking through research and the science of reading. Phi Delta Kappan. 105. 37-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217231205940
Jones, S., 2021. Increasing reading achievement: An applied research study on the eeffects of implementing an independent reading time at lester elementary school. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1–43.
Hoffman, J.V., Schallert, D.L., 2004. The Texts in Elementary Classrooms, 1st ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc: Mahwah. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611086
Marquez, L.P., 2017. Critical thinking in Philippine education: What we have and what we need. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies. 15(2). 272–303.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2019. Reading and reading instruction: Research-based practices. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/factsheets/reading (cited 1 March 2024).
Nyarko, K., Kugbey, N., Kofi, C.C., et al., 2018. English reading proficiency and academic performance among lower primary school children in Ghana. SAGE Open, 8(3). 215824401879701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018797019
Nikolopoulou, K., 2023. What is purposive sampling? definition & examples. Scribbr. Available from: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/purposive-sampling/ (cited 22 March 2024).
Paul, R., Elder, L., 2016. Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative thought. Journal of Development Education. 40(2), 34–35.
Penprase, B., Oakley, B., Ternes, R., et al., 2014. Do higher dispositions for empathy predispose males toward careers in nursing? A descriptive correlational design. Nursing Forum. 50(1), 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12058
Salazar, E.M., Alfonso, M.L., 2017. The relationship between reading proficiency and academic achievement among high school students. Reading and Writing Quarterly. 33(4), 327–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9905-z
Balan, S., Katenga, J., Simon, A., 2019. Reading Habits and Their Influence on Academic Achievement Among Students at Asia Pacific International University. Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference. 7(1), 1490–1516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.928
Shanahan, T., Shanahan, C., 2017. What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topic in Language Disorders. 37(3), 271–282.
Siegel, H., 1988. Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Educating-Reason%3A-Rationality%2C-Critical-Thinking-Siegel/e2a00dc20e730896eba7bacdb4014a56965b4f56 (cited 11 February 2023).
Sincero, S. M., 2024. A Questionnaire checklist - important things to check before a launch. Available from: https://explorable.com/questionnaire-checklist (cited 12 March 2024).
Sirisilla, S., Sirisilla, S., 2023. Bridging the gap: overcome these 7 flaws in descriptive research design. Enago Academy. Available from: https://www.enago.com/academy/descriptive-research-design/ (cited 1 April 2024).
Snow, C.E., Uccelli, P., 2009. The challenge of academic language. In: Dickinson, D.K., Neuman, S.B. (Eds.). Handbook of Early Literacy Research. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. pp:112–133.
Suraprajit, P., 2019. Bottom-up vs top-down model: The perception of reading strategies among Thai university students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.454.10.17507/jltr.1003.07
Torgesen, J.K., Houston, D. D., Rissman, L.M., et al., 2007. Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document from the Center on Instruction. NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction: Portsmouth. pp, 1–180.
Twardy, C.R., 2015. Argument maps improve critical thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 38(2), 213-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil200427213
Young Jeon, E., Day, R., 2016. The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language. 28(2), 246–265.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2024 Ma. Cecilia S. Caldoza, Nelson U. Julhamid, Masnona S. Asiri
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.