Ethnolinguistics as a Tool for Studying the Cultural Heritage of the World’s Peoples

Authors

  • Yuriy Polyezhayev

    Department of Foreign Philology and Translation, Faculty of Humanities, National University Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic, Zaporizhzhia 69063, Ukraine

  • Anna Maksymova

    Department of International Relationship and Social Humanitarian Discipline, Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Innovative Education, Dnipropetrovsk University of Internal Affairs, Dnipro 49005, Ukraine

  • Olena Tytar

    Department of Theory of Culture and Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Philosophy, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine

  • Alla  Kulichenko

    Department of Foreign Languages, Zaporizhzhia State Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Zaporizhzhia 69035, Ukraine

  • Nataliya Rukolyanska

    Department of Social Sciences and Humanities and Language Training, Municipal Institution of Higher Education “Khortytsia National Educational and Rehabilitational Academy” of Zaporizhzhia Regional Council, Zaporizhzhia 69017, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6830
Received: 4 July 2024 | Revised: 14 September 2024 | Accepted: 18 September 2024 | Published Online: 8 November 2024

Abstract

The article shows that the links between linguistic and cultural phenomena, the collaboration of ethnocultural and ethnopsychological aspects in the functioning of language can be clarified by the examples of idioms in different languages. The aim is to specify a theoretical justification of ethnolinguistic manifestations in language in different countries. The methodology used for this study was a literature review, which was focused on a systematic approach to evaluate current works and studies in the arena of ethnolinguistics. The analytical-synthetic and descriptive methods, methods of comparison and analogy, and the functional approach were used to analyse and determine the relationship between language and culture on the basis of idioms from Ukrainian, English, Chinese, Turkish and German. Ethnolinguistics studies culture through the prism of historical events, national norms, customs, rituals, traditions, folk beliefs, ethical and aesthetic values, through thematic groups of borrowed vocabulary, phraseology, and paremics. The interaction of language and culture is manifested in the mastery of various texts, in language contacts, in the development of cultural attitudes, and in interpersonal communication. The essential characteristics of national culture can be studied with the aid of proverbs or idioms from various languages that reflect their respective cultures, common or different histories, ways of thinking, religious beliefs, traditions, customs, rituals, values, lifestyles, etc., according to linguistic studies of phraseological units based on the examples of the UK, USA, China, Germany, Turkey, and Ukraine. The conclusion of this study demonstrate the possibility of comparing cultures and analysing various processes that took place in several societies, and will allow scholars to conduct further research and adequately assess cultural phenomena through language.

Keywords:

Cultural Identities; Intercultural Communication; Lexical Borrowings; Phraseological Units; Language Policy; Ethnoculture; Preservation of Linguistic Diversity

References

[1] Melnyk, N.I., 2020. Ethnicity in the Context of Domestic and Foreign Ethnolinguistics. Scientific Notes of the International Humanitarian University. 32, 66–70. Available from: http://www.sci-notes.mgu.od.ua/archive/v32/18.pdf

[2] Prikhodko, G.I., 2022. Ethnolinguistic Aspect of Phraseology Research. Notes on Romance and Germanic Philology. 1(48), 93–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18524/2307-4604.2022.1(48).259990

[3] Tsariova, I.V., 2019. Vectors of Research on Ritual Phraseology in English. Bulletin of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University. Philological Sciences. 2(325), 122–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2019-2(325)-122-130

[4] Venzhynovych, N.F., 2021. Features of Translation of Phraseological Units from Ukrainian into English: A Study Guide for Students of the Faculty of Philology. Uzhhorod: Danylo S.I. p. 104. Available from: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/49230/1/Венжинович_МЕТОДИЧКА%20УКР.АНГЛ_2021_2pr.pdf

[5] Danilyan, O.G., Arbeláez-Campillo, D.F., Rojas-Bahamón, M.J., 2022. The influence of globalisation processes on the cultural sphere. Revista de Filosofia. 39(100), 143–154. Available from: https://zenodo.org/records/5979776

[6] Hrytsiv, N.M., Shyika, Y.I., 2020. Ethno-cultural component in bilingual education: introductory remarks. Herald of Alfred Nobel University. Series “Philological Sciences”. 1(19), 361–367. Available from: https://phil.duan.edu.ua/images/PDF/2020/1/37.pdf

[7] Davydchenko, I.D., 2024. Trends and prospects of linguistic and cultural studies education in Ukraine. Progress and Achievements in Science. 1(1), 415–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1254-2024-1(1)-415-424

[8] Cherska, J., Gladkoskok, L., 2020. Linguistic-cultural peculiarities of the study of language units: means of verbalisation of the concept “Rationalism”. Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Philology. 45(2), 151–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2020.45-2.37

[9] Barbaniuk, O., 2023. Linguistic and Cultural Codes of English Discourse. Philological Disciplines in Higher Education: Linguodidactic Aspects. 36–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-304-3-4

[10] Karpets, L.A., Linchenko, N.Y., 2022. Native Language as a Spiritual Force of The People. Spirituality of the Individual: Methodology, Theory and Practice. 1(103), 99–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33216/2220-6310-2022-103-1-99-108

[11] Popova, O., Golubtsov, S., Grushevskaya, E., et al., 2019. Language, Culture, Society at the Intersection of Modern Scientific Disciplines. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research: International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches. 373, 52–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.12

[12] Khaliavinskyi, I., 2023. The Language Factor in The Formation of Ukrainian Mentality in The XVII–XVIII Centuries. Actual Problems of Humanities. 70(2), 41–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/70-2-5

[13] Orhani, S., 2023. Philosophy of e-Learning vs m-Learning. Future Philosophy. 2(4), 4–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2023.12.30.01

[14] Sayed, R., 2023. Exploring Cultural Influences on Project Management Approaches in Global Business Development. Future of Social Sciences. 1(4), 38–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2023.12.20.02

[15] Shulenok, O.S., 2023. Phraseologisms with an Ornithonomous Component in the Modern Ukrainian Language: Structural-Semantic and Ethnolinguistic Features [Ph.D. Thesis]. Kyiv, UA: Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University. p. 257. Available from: https://elibrary.kubg.edu.ua/id/eprint/46489/1/Шуленок%20ОСТАТОЧНА%20УСЯ%20ДИС.pdf

[16] Mekhrangiz, A., 2023. Phraseology as a Linguocultural Phenomenon. Best Journal of Innovation in Science, Research and Development. 2(4), 275–279. Available from: http://www.bjisrd.com/index.php/bjisrd/article/view/162/145

[17] Kozlova, T.O., Polyezhayev, Y.G., 2022. Cognitive-pragmatic Study of Australian English Phraseology. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 12(1), 85–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33543/12018593

[18] Svirepchuk, I., 2022. The Origin of Phraseological Units of Modern English. Philology and Linguistics: Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference “Science and Education in Progress”; Dublin, IRE; 26–28 October 2022. Volume 130, pp. 192–194. Available from: https://archive.interconf.center/index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/1555/1584

[19] Fomenko, T., Bilotserkovets, M., Klochkova, T., et al., 2020. Overcoming Barriers in Intercultural Communication: A Case Study on Agricultural Idioms in English, Ukrainian and Chinese. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 9(6), 157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0120

[20] Polyukhovych, V.I., 2023. Semantic Features of Phraseological Units with the Somatic Component “Hand” Based on the Turkish Language: A Course Work, Kyiv: KNLU. p. 35. Available from: http://rep.knlu.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/787878787/3339/Poliukhovych%20V.I%20Птур14-20.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

[21] Berezhna, S., 2020. Linguistic Culture as a Reflection of The Linguistic World Picture. Translation Innovations: Materials of The 10th All-Ukrainian Student’s Association Scientific-Practical Conference; Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine; 20–21 March, 2020. pp. 18–19. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340135923_Ministerstvo_osviti_i_nauki_Ukraini_Sumskij_derzavnij_universitet_PEREKLADACKI_INNOVACII_MATERIALI_X_VSEUKRAINSKOI_STUDENTSKOI_NAUKOVO-PRAKTICNOI_KONFERENCII

[22] Nikolsky, E.V., Yugan, N.L., 2018. Russophilism as a Manifestation of the Carpatho-Russian National Spirit Among The Uniat Clergy of Galichina in The First Half of The XIXth Century. 54(4), 72–89. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287407679.pdf

[23] Jamallullail, S.H., Nordin, S.M., 2023. Ethnolinguistics Vitality Theory: The Last Stance for a Language Survival. Sustainable Multilingualism [online]. 22(1), 27–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sm-2023-0002

[24] Hrytsenko, P.Y., Rusnak, N.O., Rusnak, Y.M., et al., 2022. Ethnolinguistics: The Ukrainian Language: A Textbook. Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University: Chernivtsi, UA. p. 432. Available from: https://archer.chnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/4714/1/Етнолінгвістика.pdf

[25] The Oxford Dictionary of Idioms (4th ed.), 2020. Oxford University Press.

[26] Marushchenko, Y., 2020. Structural and Semantic Characteristics of Paremics with the Meaning of ‘Food’ in English. Actual Problems of Foreign Philology and Linguodidactics. 2, 280–283. Available from: https://dspace.hnpu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/5973c141-3be6-4feb-9af9-fa4d6ac16fcd/content

[27] Bedrii, M.M., 2023. Paremic Forms of Fixation of The Ukrainian People’s Legal Customs. Sociology of Law. 1–2(44–45), 17–23. Available from: http://soclaw.idpnan.kyiv.ua/archive/2023/1-2/1-2_2023.pdf

[28] Zhdaniuk, L.O., 2021. Features of Translation of English Place Names into Ukrainian (Based on the Work of James Oliver Kerwood ‘Return to the Country of God’): Qualification Work. Poltava: Poltava Institute of Economics and Law. p. 96.

[29] Miller, J., 2019. Data for: The Bottom Line: Are Idioms Used in English Academic Speech and Writing? Mendeley Data. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17632/m3sw5hg5zs.3

[30] Zaluzhna, O., Novozhylova, D., 2021. Semantic Peculiarities of Phraseological Units With The Gastronomic Component ‘Bakery Products’ in English and Ukrainian. Humanities Science Current Issues. 2(40), 78–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/40-2-13

[31] Bialyk, V., 2023. Linguistic Aspects of Intercultural Communication. Scientific Notes. Series: Philological Sciences. 193, 84–92. Available from: https://journals.cusu.in.ua/index.php/philology/article/view/45

[32] Alpatova, O.V., 2020. Phraseology and Paremiology: On the Issue of Selecting Linguistic and Local Lore Material for Classes with Foreign Students. Language and Speciality: Topical Issues of Teaching Foreigners in Higher Education: Collection of Materials of the III International Scientific and Methodological Conference (14–15 May, 2020); Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics, Lankaran State University. Kharkiv: UA, 9–15. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hanna-ganna-Anna-Onkovych/publication/342715800_VIKIDIDAKTIKA_VIKIUROK_MIZNARODNIJ_DEN_RIDNOI_MOVI_V_AUDITORII_INOZEMNIH_STUDENTIV/links/5f032c2ca6fdcc4ca44eb1b1/VIKIDIDAKTIKA-VIKIUROK-MIZNARODNIJ-DEN-RIDNOI-MOVI-V-AUDITORII-INOZEMNIH-STUDENTIV.pdf

[33] Artemenko, G.S., 2022. Good and Evil in The Ukrainian Idioms: Cognitive and Metaphorical Models. Transcarpathian Philological Studies. 24(1), 7–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/tps2663-4880/2022.24.1.1

[34] Marchenko, O.M., 2019. Ethnology of The Peoples of The World. Study Guide. Polymed-Service LLC: Kropyvnytskyi, UA. p. 381.

[35] Vorobiyov, V., Zakirova, O., Anyushenkova, O., et al., 2020. Cultural Linguistics and Language for Special Purposes: Cognitive, Ethnolinguistic And Linguocultural Approaches. Revista ESPACIOS. 41(20), 270–278.

[36] Buckingham, L., 2020. Ethnolinguistic Diversity in New Zealand: A Socioeconomic Analysis. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 2020(266), 5–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2108

[37] Ting, S.H., Berek, F.E., 2021. Marriages of Unequal Languages: The Use of Bidayuh Among Children from Chinese, Malay and Melanau Mixed Marriages. Sociolinguistic Studies. 15(2–4), 323–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.41152

[38] Wang, O., Hatoss, A., 2021. Chronotopes, Language Practices and Language Shift: An Ethnographic Study of The Blang Community in China. International Journal of Multilingualism. 20(3), 1250–1267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2021.1994979

[39] Jurayeva, B.M., Nurova, U.Y., 2022. Theoretical Study of Ethnolinguistics in World Linguistics. European Journal of Life Safety and Stability. 15, 21–26. Available from: https://uniwork.buxdu.uz/resurs/12969_1_455B11201DCF2D6EFC7BCD2822014F2BF79D39DD.pdf

[40] Davronov, D., Nurova, U.Y., 2022. Ethnolinguistics: Emergence, Development And Theoretical Research. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development. 6(6), 1531–1535. Available from: http://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd52117.pdf

Downloads

How to Cite

Polyezhayev, Y., Maksymova, A., Tytar, O., Kulichenko, A., & Rukolyanska, N. (2024). Ethnolinguistics as a Tool for Studying the Cultural Heritage of the World’s Peoples. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6830