From Structuralism to Interpretation: Revisiting the Prague School’s Theoretical Legacy

Authors

  • Noble Po Kan Lo

    1. Department of Educational Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, UK ; 2. Division of Languages and Communication, College of Professional and Continuing Education, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7477
Received: 11 October 2024 | Revised: 21 October 2024 | Accepted: 29 October 2024 | Published Online: 13 December 2024

Abstract

The Prague School, established in 1926, stands as a critical intellectual development in the study of language and literature, offering a systematic framework for analyzing the structural and functional aspects of communication. Guided by the intellectual rigour of figures such as Vilém Mathesius, Roman Jakobson, Jan Mukařovský, and René Wellek, the School introduced foundational methodologies that advanced structural linguistics through the study of phonemes, markedness theory, and the functional sentence perspective. In the realm of literary theory and poetics, the School emphasised principles such as foregrounding, automatisation, and the aesthetic function, which sought to elucidate the intricate relationship between artistic form and communicative purpose. Expanding into semiotics, Mukařovský’s concept of “the aesthetic sign” redefined the understanding of artistic texts as communicative acts shaped by cultural and functional dynamics. Contemporary scholarship, including Barthes’ theoretical extensions, reveals how the Prague School’s insights resonate within new criticism, structuralism, post-structuralism, narratology, and cognitive linguistics. While formalistic tendencies in its approach have been questioned, the Prague School’s insistence on systematic analysis and the interrelation of linguistic and literary components remains a vital instrument for modern literary criticism. Its influence persists as newer generations of scholars refine, critique, and reinterpret its theories, further enriching the study of language, literature, and culture.

Keywords:

Structural Linguistics; Foregrounding; Semiotics; Markedness Theory; Aesthetic Function

References

[1] Dobrenko, E., Jonsson-Skradol, N. (Eds.), 2018. Socialist Realism in Central and Eastern European Literature under Stalin. Anthem Press: London, UK.

[2] Jauss, H.R., 2022. Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory. New Directions in Literary History. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 11–41.

[3] Wellek, R., 2018. The Attack on Literature and Other Essays. UNC Press Books: Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

[4] Bar-Itzhak, C., 2020. Intellectual Captivity: Literary Theory, World Literature, and the Ethics of Interpretation. Journal of World Literature. 5(1), 79–110.

[5] Domínguez, C., 2022. Dionýz Ďurišin and a Systemic Theory of World Literature. The Routledge Companion to World Literature. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 61–68.

[6] Váňa, J., 2020. Theorising the Social through Literary Fiction: For a New Sociology of Literature. Cultural Sociology. 14(2), 180–200.

[7] Karstens, B., 2019. The Impact of Russian Formalism on Linguistic Structuralism. Form and Formalism in Linguistics. 1, 115–136.

[8] Outes, C.C., 2024. The Three Jakobsons: Notes Towards a Historical Analysis of Roman Jakobson's Contribution to Twentieth-Century Literary Theory. Enthymema. 35, 1–15.

[9] Qu, C.L., 2018. Linguistic and Extra-Linguistic History behind Roman Jakobson's Distinctive Feature: The Perspective of European Crises and Intellectual Odyssey. Interface-Journal of European Languages and Literatures. 5, 1–20.

[10] Waugh, L.R., 2021. Roman Jakobson's Work on Semiotics and Language. Tartu Semiotics Library. 23, 15–32.

[11] Váňa, J., 2022. The Sociological Truth of Fiction: The Aesthetic Structure of a Novel and the Iconic Experience of Reading. The Cultural Sociology of Reading: The Meanings of Reading and Books Across the World. Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA. pp. 111–139.

[12] Feshchenko, V., 2023. Artistic Communication as an Object of Semiotics and Linguistic Aesthetics. Sign Systems Studies. 51(3–4), 565–603.

[13] Mrugalski, M., 2022. Structuralism and Semiotics in Poland. Central and Eastern European Literary Theory and the West. De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 670–722.

[14] Shapiro, M., 2022. Language Change. The Logic of Language: A Semiotic Study of Speech. Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA. pp. 177–272.

[15] Toutain, A.G., Ekaterina, V., 2023. Semiotics in Structural Linguistics. Bloomsbury Semiotics Volume 3: Semiotics in the Arts and Social Sciences. 3, 261–280.

[16] Bierwisch, M., 2018. Roman Jakobson. Handbook of Pragmatics: 21st Annual Instalment. 21, 159.

[17] Raq, S.R.A., Chaware, C.N., Saleh, A.J. Othman. Comparison of Mahwi's and Plato's Philosophical Texts on Theology. Journal of University of Raparin. 8(2), 24–55.

[18] Drozd, D. (Ed.), 2017. Theatre Theory Reader: Prague School Writings. Charles University in Prague. Karolinum Press: Prague, The Czech Republic.

[19] Sag Sencal, E., 2020. The Emergence and Development of Saussurean Linguistic Thought and Structural Linguistics in Turkey. Language & History. 63(2), 139–165.

[20] Zun, X.Z., 2020. History and Field Linguistics. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics. 1(2), 93–103.

[21] Repka, R., 2021. The Prague School of Linguistics and Halliday's Systemic and Functional Grammar. Philologia. 31(1), 165–177.

[22] Quammic-Wallen, P., 2020. The Prague School Theory of Drama & Theatre and SFL. Technium Social Sciences Journal. 11, 84–96.

[23] Ulicka, D., 2023. Spaces of Theory. Central and Eastern European Literary Theory and the West. De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 91–110.

[24] Zarycki, T., 2023. Maria Renata Mayenowa and the Forgotten Legacy of Polish Theory of Literature and Poetics. Slavonic and East European Review. 101(3), 401–429.

[25] Reisenauer, A. Literature Crossing Borders: The Reception of Spanish Literary Works in the United States Through Film Adaptations (1895–2018). Interfaces. Image Texte Language. 47, 1–250.

[26] Zelenka, M., 2022. The Concept of World Literature in Czech and Slovak Comparative Literary Studies. World Literature Studies. 14(2), 5–30.

[27] Gregoriou, C., 2023. The Linguistic Levels of Foregrounding in Stylistics. The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 89–102.

[28] Wadi, D.H., Samir J.I.J., 2021. Stylistic Investigation of Foregrounding in Contemporary Poetry. South Asian Research Journal of Art, Language and Literature. 3(5), 81–89.

[29] Odendahl, J., 2021. Embodied Cognition Affects and Language Comprehension: Theoretical Basis and (Literary-) Didactic Perspectives of a Physically-Emotionally Grounded Model of Understanding. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 20(3), 483–499.

[30] Kõvamees, E., 2024. Semiosis and Science. Explorations in Dynamic Semiosis. Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 53–98.

[31] Tatsenko, N.V., 2023. A Companion to Language and Linguistics. Sumy State University: Sumy, Ukraine.

[32] Näsman Olai, G., 2024. The Gittern in Literature and Records, 1270–1500: Social, Symbolic and Musical Aspects of a Medieval String Instrument [Master's thesis]. University of Uppsala: Uppsala, Sweden.

[33] Skovajsa, M., 2021. Continuity in Discontinuity: The Recurrent Motif of Cultural Autonomy in the Development of Czech Sociology of Culture. Cultural Sociology. 15(4), 463–485.

[34] Zarycki, T., 2022. Structural Reading of the Poland's Nineteenth-and Twentieth-Century History. The Polish Elite and Language Sciences: A Perspective of Global Historical Sociology. Springer International Publishing: New York, NY, USA. pp. 125–283.

[35] Vitézová, E., 2021. Teaching Literature at Slovak Secondary Schools (Text and Context in Literary Education). Journal of Language and Cultural Education. 9(3), 12–39.

[36] Apresjan, J.D., 2018. Principles and Methods in Contemporary Structural Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG: Berlin, Germany.

[37] McMahon, P., 2023. Prague Structuralism and the Poetic Function. Structuralism and Form in Literature and Biology: Critiquing Genetic Manipulation. Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 115–138.

[38] Pilščikov, I., 2019. The Prague School on a Global Scale: A Coup d'œil from the East. Slovo a slovesnost. 80(3), 215–228.

[39] Tuckerová, V., 2017. The Archaeology of Minor Literature: Towards the Concept of the Ultraminor. Journal of World Literature. 2(4), 433–453.

[40] Glanc, T., Mrugalski, M., Schahadat, S., et al., 2022. Transfer as the Key: Understanding the Intellectual History of the Relationship between Formalism and Structuralism from the Perspective of the Prague Linguistic Circle. Central and Eastern European Literary Theory and the West. De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 613–631.

[41] Harding, S.A., 2021. Narratology and Narrative Theory. The Routledge Handbook of Translation History. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 54–69.

[42] Garić-Komnenić, S., 2024. Bosnian Literary Adaptations on Stage and Screen. Springer International Publishing AG: Berlin, Germany.

[43] Jesenšek, M., 2020. The Slovenian Language, Literature and Teaching of Slovenian Language Research Project. Slavia Centralis. 13(2), 7–30.

[44] Shrawan, A., 2019. The Language of Literature and Its Meaning: A Comparative Study of Indian and Western Aesthetics. Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[45] Jacobs, A.M., Hakemulder, F., 2021. Willie van Peer, Paul Sopčák, Davide Castiglione, Olivia Fialho. Handbook of Empirical Literary Studies. De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 145–170.

[46] Stopel, B., 2018. From Mind to Text: Continuities and Breaks Between Cognitive, Aesthetic and Textualist Approaches to Literature. Taylor & Francis: London, UK.

[47] Kuruc, T.C., 2018. Cognitive Counterparts: The Literature of Eastern Europe's Volatile Political Times, 1917–2017. University of California: San Diego, CA, USA.

Downloads

How to Cite

Lo, N. P. K. (2024). From Structuralism to Interpretation: Revisiting the Prague School’s Theoretical Legacy. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7477

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 6 (December 2024)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.