-
5066
-
4876
-
1950
-
1807
-
1492
The Associations between Educational Systems and Entrepreneurship in the Context of Evolving Management—The Kosovo Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8232Abstract
This article explores at the relationship between entrepreneurship with Kosovo’s educational institutions, particularly in the context of change management. Evaluating how Kosovo’s educational system may be made more innovative and adaptable by incorporating entrepreneurial ideas into its structures. Entrepreneurs often navigate cultural differences when working with international partners, clients, or customers. Kosovo, with its unique context of multilingualism and evolving entrepreneurial ecosystem. This study adopts a qualitative research methodology to explore the links between entrepreneurship, education, and change management in Kosovo. The findings highlight the importance of integrating entrepreneurial thinking, problem-solving skills, and adaptability into educational curricula to prepare students for the challenges of dynamic business environments. The integration of entrepreneurial principles into the education system has the potential to drive change and innovation. This analysis supports the following conclusions: enterprises’ capacity to operate profitably and sustain their competitiveness depends on their capacity to adapt to contemporary circumstances; transformation is a crucial and unavoidable component of everyday business administration. The importance of fostering an entrepreneurial mindset to facilitate adaptability and resilience in the face of ongoing changes. Key limitations of this research is the limited availability of comprehensive data on the specific intersection of entrepreneurship education and change management within Kosovo’s educational system. The findings of this research could serve as a guide for policymakers in Kosovo to better understand the potential of integrating entrepreneurship education into the broader educational reform strategy.
Keywords:
Entrepreneurship; Educational; Training System; Change ManagementReferences
[1] Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., Yirci, R., et al., 2022. The development and evolution of digital leadership: A bibliometric mapping approach-based study. Sustainability. 14(23), 16171.
[2] Karakose, T., Polat, H., Yirci, R., et al., 2023. Assessment of the relationships between prospective mathematics teachers' classroom management anxiety, academic self-efficacy beliefs, academic amotivation and attitudes toward the teaching profession using structural equation modelling. Mathematics. 11(2), 449.
[3] Kauffman Foundation, 2020. Entrepreneurship and Economic Development: An Assessment of the State of Knowledge and Future Directions. Kauffman Foundation: Kansas City, MO, USA.
[4] Markman, G.D., Baron, R.A., 2017. Entrepreneurship in the social context: Environmental factors influencing entrepreneurial behavior and decision making. Academy of Management Perspectives. 31(3), 316–337.
[5] Kuratko, D., 2005. FThe Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends, and Challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 29(5), 577–598.
[6] Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., et al., 2023. A bibliometric review of the knowledge base on mentoring for the professional development of school administrators. Sustainability. 15(4), 3027.
[7] Lewin, K., 1947. Frontiers in Group Dynamics. Human Relations. 1(1), 5–41.
[8] Kotter, J.P., 1996. Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press: Boston, MA, USA.
[9] Hashi, I., Krasniqi, B.A., 2011. Entrepreneurship and SME growth: evidence from advanced and laggard transition economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 17(5), 456–487.
[10] Rexhepi, B.R., Murtezaj, I.M., Xhafa, H., et al., 2024. The topic of discussion is the relationship between entrepreneurship and Kosovo's organizational structure for medium and small enterprises. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. 30(4), 6084–6095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.2342
[11] Karakose, T., Papadakis, S., Tülübaş, T., 2022. Understanding the intellectual structure and evolution of distributed leadership in schools: A science mapping-based bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 14(24), 16779.
[12] Fayol, A., 2013. Personal Views on the Future of Entrepreneurship Education. In Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 11–28.
[13] Gartner, W.B., 1985. A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon of New Venture Creation. Academy of Management Review. 10(4), 696–706.
[14] Monir, Maruf Mohammad Sirajum, and Alula Nerea Geberemeskel. 2023. Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation in the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence; Bucharest, Romania, 23–25 March 2023. Volume 17, pp. 822–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0076
[15] Drucker, P.F., 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA.
[16] Karakose, T., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., et al., 2023. Evaluating the intellectual structure of the knowledge base on transformational school leadership: a bibliometric and science mapping analysis. Education Sciences. 13(7), 708.
[17] Zhao, E.Y., Seibert, S.E., 2017. The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology. 102(1), 15–28.
[18] Aldrich, H.E., Yang, T., 2016. How do entrepreneurs find the people they need? Organizational science and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals. 10(1), 72–93.
[19] Greiner, L.E., 1998. Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow. Harvard Business Review Press: Boston, MA, USA.
[20] Jansson, N., 2013. Organizational Change as practice: a critical analysis. Organizational Change Management. 26(6), 1003–1019.
[21] Schreyo, G., Sydow, J., 2011. Organizational Path Depence: Process view. Organizational Studies. 32(3), 321–335.
[22] Battilana, J., Gilmartin, M., Sengul, M., et al., 2010. Leadership competncies for implementing planed organizational change. The leadership Quartaly. 21, 422–438.
[23] Van de Ven, A.H., Sun, K., 2011. Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change. Academy of Management Perspectives. 25, 58–74.
[24] Grant, D., Marshak, R.J., 2011. Toëard a discourse-centred understanding of organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science. 47, 204–235.
[25] Stensaker, I., Falkenberg, J., 2007. Making sense of different response to coporate change. Human Relations. 60, 137–177.
[26] Smith, W.K., Lewis, M.W., 2011. Toward the theory of paradox: a dinamic equiulibrum model of organizing. Academy of Management Review. 36, 381–403.
[27] Kuntz, J., Gomes, J., 2012. Transformational change in organizations: a self-regulation approach. Organizational Change Management. 25, 143–162.
[28] Kosovo Agency of Statistics (KAS), 2022. Available from online resource: https://ask.rks-gov.net/
[29] THE IMF AND THE WORLD BANK, 2025. Available from: https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2022/IMF-World-Bank-New. (cited 3 March 2025).
[30] Central Bank of the Republic of Kosovo. Available from: https://bqk-kos.org/?lang=en (cited 3 March 2025).
[31] OECD, 2022. SME Policy Index: Western Balkans and Turkey: 2022. Assessing the Implementation of the Small Business Act for Europe. OECD: Paris, France.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Alberta Tahiri, Osman Sejfijaj, Ermira Shehu, Fisnik Morina, Kaltrina Nikqi, Idriz Kovaçi

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.