Exploring Perceptions of the Case-Based Learning Model for Enhancing Extensive Reading Skills in a Hybrid Learning Environment

Authors

  • Hijril Ismail

    English Education Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram 83127, Indonesia
  • Suranto

    English Language and Culture Département, Darma Persada University, Jakarta 13450, Indonesia
  • Lukman

    English Education Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram 83127, Indonesia
  • Arif Rahman

    English Language Education, Mandalika University of Education, Mataram 83127, Indonesia
  • Ilham

    English Education Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram 83127, Indonesia
  • Etika Ariyani

    English Education Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram 83127, Indonesia
  • Asbah

    English Education Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram 83127, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8988
Received: 6 March 2025 | Revised: 7 April 2025 | Accepted: 11 April 2025 | Published Online: 14 April 2025

Abstract

Extensive reading is a pedagogical approach that emphasizes reading for pleasure, allowing learners to choose texts that align with their interests and target language proficiency. However, two significant challenges hinder its effectiveness: the complexity of texts, which often limits comprehension, and vocabulary constraints, which impede students’ engagement with reading materials. This study explores students’ perceptions of integrating case-based learning within a hybrid learning framework to enhance extensive reading instruction in an English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context. Data were gathered through a structured questionnaire encompassing 10 dimensions and 50 statements. The research was conducted in the English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Indonesia, involving 88 English Education students enrolled in an extensive reading course. The findings reveal that students generally held favourable perceptions of case-based hybrid learning, particularly regarding 10 critical dimensions: conceptual understanding of case-based learning, extensive reading skill development, interaction and collaboration, learner engagement, hybrid learning effectiveness, problem-solving through case studies, real-life applicability, challenges in hybrid learning, satisfaction with the instructional model, and recommendations for improvement. Overall, case-based hybrid learning was found to foster engagement, enhance comprehension, and develop students’ problem-solving abilities in EFL extensive reading instruction.

Keywords:

Case-Based Learning; Extensive Reading; Hybrid Learning; Perception

References

[1] Renandya, W.A., 2017. Should you be Teaching Reading Intensively or Extensively?. Proceedings of The KOTESOL 2016: Shaping the Future: With 21st Century Skills; October 15–16, 2017; Seoul, Republic of Korea. pp 31–39.

[2] Ro, E., Kim, H., 2021. The effects of extensive reading on young Korean students' construction development. English Language and Literature. 1(2), 1–25.

[3] Hartshorn, K.J., Evans, N., Egbert, J., et al., 2017. Discipline-specific reading expectation and challenges for ESL learners in US universities. Reading in a Foreign Language. 29(1), 36–60.

[4] Muñoz, C., Valenzuela, J., 2020. Demotivation in academic reading during teacher training. Jounal of Research in Reading. 43(1), 41–56.

[5] Liang, W., Fung, D., 2021. Fostering critical thinking in English-as-a-second-language classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Think Ski Creat. 39, 100769.

[6] Dewi, C.A., Rahayu, S., Dasna, I.W., 2022. Case-Based Learning (CBL) in Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Review. Journal of Research in Science Education. 8(4), 1926–1936.

[7] Ripert, R.C., 2021. The Implications of Case-based Learning (CBL) on Biochemistry Education: An Integrative Literature Review [Honors undergraduate thesis]. University of Central Florida: Orlando, FL, USA.

[8] Dong, H., Guo, C., Zhou, L., et al., 2022. Effectiveness of case­based learning in Chinese dental education: A systematic analysis review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 12(2) 1–10.

[9] Sapeni, M.A.-A.R., Said, S., 2020. The effectiveness of case-based learning in increasing critical thinking of nursing students: A literature review. Enfermería Clínica. 30, 182–185.

[10] Lestari, Syafril, S., Latifah, S., et al., 2021. Hybrid learning on problem-solving abiities in physics learning: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1796, 012021.

[11] Ismail, H., Edi, E., 2022. Students' perceptions of implementing problem-based learning with blended learning in Efl academic reading. English Review: Journal of English Education. 10(3), 929–936.

[12] Eka, K., Janah, N., Mustofa, A., 2022. Digital extensive reading in indonesia: A critical review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics. 7(3), 513–528.

[13] Sistermans, I.J., 2020. Integrating competency-based education with a case-based or problem-based learning approach in online health sciences. Asia Pacific Education Review. 21(4), 683–696.

[14] Bozkurt, A., 2022. A retro perspective on blended / hybrid learning: Systematic review, mapping and visualization of the scholarly landscape. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2022(1), 1–15.

[15] Helsa, Y., Marasabessy, R., Juandi, D., 2023. Penerapan hybrid learning di Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia: Literatur review. Journal Cendekia: Jurnal of Pendidikan Matematika. 07(1), 139–162.

[16] Wandansari, S.A., 2021. A Hybrid Learning for Building Academic Resilience in Student with Disabilities During Pandemic. Proceedings of The 5th International Conference on Islamic Studies; November 1718, 2021; IAIN Madura, Indonesia. pp. 119–136.

[17] Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S, Bélisle, M., 2021. An examination of teachers' strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 18(25), 1–25.

[18] Castro-gil, R., Correa, D., 2021. Transparency in previous literature reviews about blended learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. 3399–3426.

[19] Liu, X., 2021. Primary Scinence curriculum student accptance of blended learning: Structural equation modeling and visual analytics. Jounalof Computers in Education. 9, 351–377.

[20] Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R., 2019. Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments : A Conceptual Framework. The Internet and Higher Education. 23(2), 145–178.

[21] Manwaring, K.C., Larsen, R., Graham, C., et al., 2017. Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. The Internet and Higher Education. 35, 21–33.

[22] López-pellisa, T., Rotger, N., Rodríguez-Gallego, F., 2020. Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies. 26, 1293–1310.

[23] Sultana, T.S., Gite, R.M., Tawde, D.A., et al., 2024. Advancing Healthcare Education: A Comprehensive Review of Case-based Learning.Indian Journal of Continuing Nursing Education. 25(1), 36–41.

[24] Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L.R., 2024. The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students' motivation: A meta-analysis. Educatnal Psychological Review. 36, 29.

[25] Tan, K.H., Rajendran, A., Muslim, N., et al., 2022. The potential of TikTok's key features as a pedagogical strategy for ESL classrooms. Sustainability. 14(24), 1–22.

[26] Kılınç, S., 2023. Embracing the future of distance science education: Opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT integration. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 18(1), 205–237. Available from: http://www.asianjde.com/

[27] Yu, L., Zin, Z.M., 2023. The critical thinking-oriented adaptations of problem-based learning models: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education. 8, 1–13.

[28] Shehata, B., Tlili, A., Huang, R., et al., 2024. How are we doing with student-centered learning facilitated by educational technologies? A systematic review of literature reviews. Education and Information Technologies. 29, 7813–7854.

[29] Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., et al., 2023. A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments. 10(1), 61.

[30] Che Mat, N., Jamaludin, K.A., 2024. Effectiveness of practices and applications of student-centered teaching and learning in primary schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 13(3), 1025–1044.

[31] Lau, I., Sun, Z., 2022. The role of 3D printed heart models in immediate and long-term knowledge acquisition in medical education. Reviews in Cardiovasculalr Medicine. 23(1), 1–9.

[32] Owen, K.L., Hughes, J.C., Watkins, R.C., 2022. From evidence‐informed to evidence‐based: An evidence building framework for education. Review of Education. 10(1), pp. 1–25.

[33] Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., et al., 2020. Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(8), e16504.

[34] Senyah, A.O., 2024. An Integrative Review of K-12 Teachers' Strategies and Challenges in Adapting Problem-Based Learning [PhD thesis]. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, VA, USA.

[35] Preshaw, P.M., Ramseier, C.A., Loos, B.G., et al., 2024. Contemporary educational methods in periodontology. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 51(March), 117–192.

[36] White, R.L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., et al., 2021. Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teachig and Teacher Education. 99, 103247.

[37] Guay, F., 2022. Applying self-determination theory to education: Regulations types, psychological needs, and autonomy supporting behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 37(1), 75–92.

[38] Sukackė, V., Guerra, A.O.P.d.C., Ellinger, D., et al., 2022. Towards active evidence-based learning in engineering education: A systematic literature review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability. 14(21), 13955.

[39] Martins, S., Vairinhos, M., 2023. Ludic and narrative immersion in virtual reality exposure therapy to animal phobias: A systematic literature review. Virtual Worlds. 2(4), 303–325.

[40] Singh, A.K., Alshammari, S.R., 2024. Storytelling (Hakawati) as a pedagogical tool: A literature review of theoretical insights and practical applications. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology. 14(2), 145–166.

[41] Aceto, G., Persico, V., Pescapé, A., 2024. The role of Information and Communication Technologies in healthcare: Taxonomies, perspectives, and challenges. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 107(April), 125–154.

[42] Ngandu, M.R., Risinamhodzi, D., Dzvapatsva, G.P., et al., 2023. Capturing student interest in software engineering through gamification: A systematic literature review. Discover Education. 2(1), 47.

[43] Kexin, D., Buang, N.A., 2024. Integrating innovative teaching strategies: Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classrooms, blended learning, and task-oriented methods in enhancing academic performance in vocational IT education. Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM). 3(05), 94–108.

[44] Doolittle, P., Wojdak, K., Walters, A., 2023. Defining active learning: A restricted systematic review. Teaching & Learning Inquiry. 11, 1–24.

[45] Goodwin, J.R., 2024. What's the difference? A comparison of student-centered teaching methods. Education Sciences. 14(7), 736.

[46] de Ruig, N.J., de Jong, P.F., Zee, M., 2023. Stimulating elementary school students' self-regulated learning through high-quality interactions and relationships: A narrative review. Educational Psychology Review. 35(3), 1–34.

[47] Pramesworo, I.S., Fathurrochman, I., Sembing, D., et al., 2023. Relevance between blended learning and students' independent learning curriculum: An overview of digital age education, student and teacher engagement, technological resources. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran. 9(3), 858.

[48] Yang, W., Wei, Y., Wei, H., et al., 2023. Survey on explainable AI: From approaches, limitations and applications aspects. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems. 3(3), 161–188.

[49] Yan, A., Cheng, Z., 2024. A review of the development and future challenges of case-based reasoning. Applied Sciences. 14(16), 7130.

[50] Johnson, J.L., Adkins, D., Chauvin, S., 2020. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 84(1), 138–146.

[51] Çeken, B., Taşkın, N., 2022. Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments. 9(1), 19.

[52] Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., et al., 2023. Virtual reality in education: A review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. Electronis. 12(13), 1–21.

[53] Lee, S.M., 2022. A systematic review of context-aware technology use in foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 35(3), 294–318.

[54] Jiang, S., Sun, Q., Lin, X., 2024. Exploring Chinese international students' critical thinking skills: A systematic literature review. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 2024(182–183), 125–141.

[55] Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., et al., 2021. The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology. 42(3), 214–240.

[56] Ali, Z., Palpanadan, S.T., Asad, M.M., et al., 2022. Reading approaches practiced in EFL classrooms: A narrative review and research agenda. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 7(1), 28.

[57] Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., Luck, J., 2021. Learning management systems: A review of the research methodology literature in Australia and China. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 44(2), 164–178.

[58] van Nooijen, C.C.A., de Koning, B.B., Bramer, W.M., et al., 2024. A cognitive load theory approach to understanding expert scaffolding of visual problem-solving tasks: A scoping review. Educational Psychology Review. 36, 12.

[59] Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., Guzzo, T., 2020. Online learning and emergency remote teaching: Opportunities and challenges in emergency situations. Societies. 10(4), 1–18.

[60] Celestino, E.H., Noronha, A.B., 2021. Blended learning: A systematic review of advantages and disadvantages in students' perceptions and impacts on higher education institutes. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa. 22(1), 31–63.

[61] Fries, L., Son, J.Y., Givvin, K.B., et al., 2021. Practicing connections: A framework to guide instructional design for developing understanding in complex domains. Educational Psychology Review. 33(2), 739–762.

Downloads

How to Cite

Ismail, H., Suranto, Lukman, Rahman, A., Ilham, Ariyani, E., & Asbah. (2025). Exploring Perceptions of the Case-Based Learning Model for Enhancing Extensive Reading Skills in a Hybrid Learning Environment. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 729–750. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8988

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 4 (April 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Hijril Ismail, Suranto, Lukman, Arif Rahman, Ilham, Etika Ariyani, Asbah

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.