Quality Models for Open, Flexible, and Online Learning

Authors

  • Ebba Ossiannilsson Swedish Association for Distance Education, International Council for Open and Distance Education, Lund, 22235, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jcsr.v2i4.2357

Abstract

This article is based on research conducted for the European Commission Education & Training 2020 working group on digital and online learning (ET2020 WG-DOL) specifically regarding policy challenges, such as the following: 1) Targeted policy guidance on innovative and open learning environments under outcome; 2) Proposal for a quality assurance model for open and innovative learning environments, its impact on specific assessment frameworks and its implication for EU recognition and transparency instruments. The article aims to define quality in open, flexible, and online learning, particularly in open education, open educational resources (OER), and massive open online courses (MOOC). Hence, quality domains, characteristics, and criteria are outlined and discussed, as well as how they contribute to quality and personal learning so that learners can orchestrate and take responsibility for their own learning pathways. An additional goal is to identify the major stakeholders directly involved in open online education and to describe their visions, communalities, and conflicts regarding quality in open, flexible, and online learning. The article also focuses on quality in periods of crisis, such as during the pandemic in 2020. Finally, the article discusses the rationale and need for a model of quality in open, flexible, and online learning based on three major criteria for quality: excellence, impact, and implementation from the learner’s perspective.

Keywords:

Covid-19; Crises; Flexible learning; Open online learning; OER MOOC; Quality models; Stakeholders; Success factors

References

[1] Ossiannilsson, E. Quality models for open online learning (OOL), open educational resources (OER) and massive open online courses (MOOC). Brussels: European Commission ET Working Group on Open and Distance Learning (ODL), 2016. (Unpublished raw data).

[2] Ossiannilsson, E., Williams, K., Camilleri, A., Brown, M. Quality models in online and open education around the globe: State of the art and recommendations. Oslo: International Council for Open and Distance Education. 2015. http://www.icde.org/en/icde_news/Global+overview+of+quality+in+online+and+open+education.b7C_wRvG43.ips

[3] UNESCO. SDG4, 2015.

[4] UNESCO. OER recommendation, 2019.

[5] UNESCO. Futures of education. 2019a. https://en.unesco.org/news/new-unesco-recommendation-will-promote-access-educational-resources-all

[6] UNESCO. Recommendation on open educational resources (OER). Ref: CL/4319, 2020. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=49556&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

[7] Commonwealth of Learning.

[8] Open Educational Consortium. Definition of open education, 2015.

[9] Inamorato dos Santos, A., Punie, Y., Castaño Muñoz, J. Opening up education: A support framework for higher education institutions. Seville: Joint Research Center, 2016. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC101436/jrc101436.pdf

[10] UNESCO. Dynamic coalition, 2020.

[11] Sala, A., Punie, Y., Garkov, V., Cabrera-Giraldez, M. LifeComp: The European framework for personal, social and learning to learn key competence. Luxembourg, 2020. DOI: http://10.2760/302967 (online). DOI: http://10.2760/922681 (print).

[12] EADTU. Definition of massive open online courses (V1.1). 2015. http://www.openuped.eu/images/docs/Definition_Massive_Open_Online_Courses.pdf

[13] Jansen, D., Rosewell, J., Kear, K. Quality frameworks for MOOC. In M. Jemni, K. Khribi, and M. Koutheair (Eds.), Open education: From OER to MOOC. Springer, 2017: 261-28.

[14] Ossiannilsson, E. Benchmarking e-learning in higher education: Lessons learned from international projects. (Doctoral dissertation, Oulu University, Finland), 2012. http://jultika.oulu.fi/Record/isbn978-952-62-0041-5

[15] Ossiannilsson, E. Opening up education: Quality matters and personalization. In M. T. Restivo, A. Cardosa, & A. M. Lopez (Eds.), Online experimentation: Emerging technologies and IoT. International Frequency Sensor Association (IFSA), 2015: 247- 260.

[16] Kahn. B. H., Ally, M. International handbook of e-learning, theoretical perspectives and research. Routledge, 2015, 1.

[17] Frydenberg, J. Quality Standards in eLearning: A matrix of analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2002, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i2.109

[18] Kahn. B. H. E-learning framework and models, 2020. http://asianvu.com/bk/framework/

[19] Kear, K., Rosewell, J., Williams, K., Ossiannilsson, E., Covadonga Rodrigo, C., (UNED), Sánchez-Elvira Paniagua, A, Santamaría Lancho, M., André Vyt, A., Harvey Mellar, H. Final Editing: Karen Kear. K., & Rosewell, J., coordinated by George Ubachs, G. (EADTU), and Lizzie Konings, L. (EADTU). Quality assessment for e-learning: A benchmarking approach (3rd ed.). Heerlen: EADTU, 2016.

[20] Contact North. Rethinking quality dimension, 2018.

[21] Ossiannilsson, E. OER and OEP for access, equity, equality, quality, inclusiveness, and empowering lifelong learning. The International Journal for Open Educational Resources, 2019, 3.

[22] Ossiannilsson, E. After Covid19, some challenges for universities. In A. Tlili, D. Burgos, and A. Tabacco (Eds.), Education in a crisis context: COVID-19 as an opportunity for global learning. Springer, LNET Series, 2020a.

[23] Ossiannilsson, E. OER: open to ideas, open to the world. Springer Briefs in Open and Distance Education. New York: Springer. (Manuscript in preparation), 2020.

[24] Ossiannilsson, E. Toward a quality framework for OER: Application of Kahn’s quality framework. In B. H. Khan, S. Affouneh, S. Salha, and Z. N. Khlaif (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for the global implementation of E-learning frameworks. Manuscript submitted for publication, 2020c.

[25] JISC. (n.d.) OER quality.

[26] Kawachi, P. Quality assurance guidelines for open educational resources: TIPS framework. CEMCA, 2024. http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/562/TIPSFramework_Version%202%5B1%5D%20Copy.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

[27] Ossiannilsson, E., Glapa-Grossklag, J., Zhang, X. Opening pathways for access, inclusion, flexibility, and quality. Paper presented at the ICDE WCOL 2019, Dublin, IE, 2019.

[28] Corbell, J. R., Kahn, B. H., Corbell, M. E. (Eds.). Microlearning in the digital age: The design and delivery of learning snippets. Routledge, 2020.

[29] Fifilan, K. Could micro-learning make employees more engaged? HR learning and development, 2019. https://www.raconteur.net/hr/micro-learning-engagement?utm_source=email&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_campaign=Weekly&utm_term=July-23&utm_content=1

[30] Ossiannilsson, E., Altinay, F., Altinay, Z. Analysis of MOOC practice from learner experiences and quality cultures. Educational Media International, 2015, 4: 272-283.

[31] Ossiannilsson, Altinay, Z., Altinay, F. Towards fostering quality in open online education through OER and MOOC practices. In M. Jemni, K. Khribi, and M. Koutheair (Eds.), Open education: From OER to MOOC. Springer, 2017: 189-204.

[32] Ossiannilsson, E., Zhang, X., Wetzler, J., Gusmão, C. M. G., Aydin, C.H., Jhangiani R. S., Glapa-Grossklag, J., Makoe, M., Harichandan, D. From open educational resources to open educational practices: Moving from the margins to the mainstream [Special issue]. From open educational resources (OER) to open educational practices (OEP): Examining re-appropriation of resources in open and distance education. DMS-DMK Distance et mediations des saviors - Distance and mediations of knowledge, 2020. (Manuscript submitted for publication)

[33] Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, Jr., D. Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, Jr., A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., Shahadu, S., Brown, M., Asino, T. I. Tumwesige, J., Ramírez Reyes, T., Barrios Ipenza, E., Ossiannilsson, E., Belhamel, K., Irvine, V., Sharma, R. C., Adam, T., Janssen, B., Sklyarova, T., Olcott, N. Ambrosino, A., Lazou, C., Mocquet, B., Mano, M., Paskevicius, M. A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 2020, 15(1): 1-128.

[34] Sala, A., Punie, Y., Garkov, V., Cabrera-Giraldez, M. LifeComp: The European framework for personal, social and learning to learn key competence. Luxembourg, 2020. DOI: http://10.2760/302967 (online). DOI: http://10.2760/922681

[35] Uhomoibhi, J., Rojão Lourenço Azevedo, A., Monteiro Lopes Azevedo, J. M., Ossiannilsson, E. Learning analytics in theory and practice: Guest editorial. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 2019, 36(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-08-2

Downloads

How to Cite

Ossiannilsson, E. (2020). Quality Models for Open, Flexible, and Online Learning. Journal of Computer Science Research, 2(4), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.30564/jcsr.v2i4.2357

Issue

Vol. 2 , Iss. 4 (October 2020)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2020 Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC