Development of Recovery and Redundancy Model for Real Time Wireless Networks

Authors

  • Boniface Kayode Alese Department of Cybersecurity, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
  • Bamidele Moses Kuboye

    Department of Information Technology, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
  • Omolara Iyabode Alabede Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/jcsr.v4i3.4915

Abstract

The growth in wireless technologies applications makes the necessity of providing a reliable communication over wireless networks become obvious. Guaranteeing real time communication in wireless medium poses a significant challenge due to its poor delivery reliability. In this study, a recovery and redundancy model based on sequential time division multiple access (S-TDMA) for wireless communication is developed. The media access control (MAC) layer of the S-TDMA determines which station should transmit at a given time slot based on channel state of the station. Simulations of the system models were carried out using MATLAB SIMULINK software. SIMULINK blocks from the signal processing and communication block sets were used to model the communication system. The S-TDMA performance is evaluated with total link reliability, system throughput, average probability of correct delivery before deadline and system latency. The evaluation results displayed in graphs when compared with instant retry and drop of frame were found to be reliable in recovering loss packets.

Keywords:

Sequential time division multiple access; (S-TDMA); Wireless; Redundancy; Packets; Media access control (MAC)

References

[1] Gleeson, M., Weber, S., 2008. Fault Recovery and Redundancy in Real-time Wireless TDMA. (Accessed on February 22, 2022).

[2] Arefi, A., Khabbazian, M., 2019. Packet Loss Recovery in Broadcast for Real-Time Applications in Dense Wireless Networks from arXiv:1911.08449v1 (Accessed on19 Nov 2019).

[3] Stankovic, J., Ramamritham, K., 1988. Hard real-time systems. Tutorial text, IEEE Computer press.

[4] Deepali, V., Satbir, J., 2011. Real Time Communication Capacity for Data Delivery in Wireless Sensor Networks.

[5] Al-Kuwaiti, M., Kyriakopoulos, N., Hussein, S., 2009. Comparative Analysis of Network Dependability,Fault-tolerance, Reliability, Security, and Survivability. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 11(2).

[6] Samant, T., Kumar, Y.S., Swayamsiddha, S., 2020. Comparison Analysis of MAC Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks. IGI Global.

[7] Pijus, K., Punyasha, C., 2014. A Survey on TDMA-based MAC Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 4(6). https://www.ijetae.com

[8] Chatterjee, P., Das, N., 2009. A Cross-Layer Distributed TDMA Scheduling for Data Gathering with Minimum Latency in Wireless Sensor Networks: IEEE Wireless, VITAE.

[9] Lee, H.J., Cerpa, A., Levis, P., 2007. Improving wireless simulation through noise modeling. IPSN' 07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks. pp. 21- 30.

[10] Ye, W., Heidemann, J., Estrin, D., 2002. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Infocom. pp. 1567-1576.

[11] Ali, I.A., Fleury, M., Ghanbari, M., 2012. Distortion-Based Slice Level Prioritization for Real-Time Video over QoS-EnabledWireless Networks. Advances in Multimedia. Article ID 319785. pp. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/319785

[12] Shih, C.H., Tou, Y.M., Shieh, C.K., et al., 2015. A Self-Regulated Redundancy Control Scheme for Wireless Video Transmission. IEEE.

[13] Bassey, A., Udofia, K.M., Uko, M.C., 2016. Mitigating the Effect of Packet Losses on Real-Time Video Streaming using Peak Signal-To-Noise Ratio (PSNR) as Video Quality Assessment Metric. European Journal of Engineering and Technology. 4(3).

[14] Wang, X., Xu, L., Zhou, S., et al., 2017. Hybrid Recovery Strategy Based on Random Terrain in Wireless Sensor Networks. Scientific Programming, Article ID 5807289, pp. 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5807289

[15] Raza, M.T., Tseng, H., Li, C., et al., 2017. Modular Redundancy for Cloud based IMS Robustness. MobiWac' 17, Miami, FL, USA.

[16] Vidyalakshmi, K., Siddappa, M., Shanmukha, B., 2019. Hybrid Cross Layer Fault Resilient Energy Efficient Data Transmission for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE). 8(12).

[17] He, J., Zhou, Y., 2019. Real-Time Data Recovery in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Spatiotemporal Correlation Based on Sparse Representation. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. Article ID 2310730, pp. 7.

[18] Lucas-Estañ, M.C., Coll-Perales, B., Gozalvez, J., 2020. Redundancy and Diversity in Wireless Networks to Support Mobile Industrial Applications in Industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 17(1), 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2979759

[19] Kim, B., Park, H., Kim, K.H., et al., 2017. A Survey on Real-Time Communications in Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. Article ID 1864847, pp. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1864847

[20] Ma, M., Yang, Y., 2007. SenCar: An Energy-Efficient Data Gathering Mechanism for Large-Scale Multihop Sensor Networks, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

Downloads

How to Cite

Alese, B. K., Kuboye, B. M., & Alabede, O. I. (2022). Development of Recovery and Redundancy Model for Real Time Wireless Networks. Journal of Computer Science Research, 4(3), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.30564/jcsr.v4i3.4915

Issue

Vol. 4 , Iss. 3 (July 2022)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2022 Author(s)

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC